Those of you who take the time to glance at this article may enjoy one very slick touch employed by Mr. Wright that I hope catches on and starts being used by political pundits everywhere. He has taken the ingrained practice of following a politician's name with a parenthesized party designation and added a colorful link to Conservative Review complete with the person's Liberty Score.
NICE TOUCH! I really hope this becomes a widespread practice.
ping
From his words to God’s ear.
It is interesting here that the author distinguishes between the donors and consultants. We at FR tend to lump them together, but if the former start ignoring the latter, that is good news indeed.
Another very happy turn of events for me has been the apparent wising-up of the “evangelical” leaders. As one who would self-identify as an evangelical, it has always pained me how foolish some of these guys have been in giving support to losers like Huckabee and Santorum. Whether you support Trump or Cruz this time around, you have to be glad that they have decided to be more intelligent in their endorsements.
Thank you, Baynative and Merry Christmas to you. Hit them long and straight, but not too often.
From a related thread . . .
Regardless that Speaker Ryan has heard his RINO colleagues read the Constitution out loud at the beginnings of the last three legislative sessions, he seems to have ”inadvertently overlooked” the following about his Omnibus spending bill. A previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress is prohibited from laying taxes in the name of state power issues, essentially any issue that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers. This is evidenced by the excerpt below.
”Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” - Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
In fact, based on the Courts statement above, here is a rough approximation of how much taxpayers should be paying Congress annually to perform its Section 8-limited power duties.
Given that the plurality of clauses in Section 8 deal with defense, and given that the Department of Defense budget for 2015 was $500+ billion, I will generously round up the $500+ billion figure to $1 trillion (but probably much less) as the annual price tag of the federal government to the taxpayers.
In other words, the corrupt media, including Obama guard dog Fx News, should not be reporting multi-trillion dollar annual federal budgets without mentioning the Supreme Courts clarification of Congresss limited power to appropriate taxes in budget discussions.
Remember in November!
When patriots elect Trump, or whatever conservative they elect, they need to also elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its Section 8-limited powers to support the new president.
Also consider that such a Congress would probably be more willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
I love an optimist, but the court is still very much out on whether we’re deconstructing the Establishment or merely adding new members to it. By their works, not their words, we will know them.
Bflr