Posted on 12/23/2015 2:07:06 PM PST by Altura Ct.
For 500 years, they've exploited their fellow man and plundered the planet. It's time they reign themselves in
The future of life on the planet depends on bringing the 500-year rampage of the white man to a halt. For five centuries his ever more destructive weaponry has become far too common. His widespread and better systems of exploiting other humans and nature dominate the globe. The time for replacing white supremacy with new values is now. And just as some whites played a part in ending slavery, colonialism, Jim Crow segregation, and South African apartheid, there is surely a role whites can play in restraining other whites in this era. Beneath the sound and fury generated by GOP presidential candidates, Fox News, website trolls, police unions and others, white people are becoming aware as never before of past and present racism.
Admittedly, this encouraging development is hardly the dominant view. To the contrary, given the possibility that Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson or one of their ilk might become president, white supremacist ideology seems to be digging in harder than ever.
I donât take this lightly. Once upon a time I foolishly thought that there was no way that Ronald Reagan could get elected president. Lesson learned. Now is the time to start contingency planning for intensified resistance to mass deportations of immigrants, atrocities against Muslims and extreme danger to African Americans.
That said, it would be a mistake to focus only on the negative. Recently theNew York Times ran Gordon Davisâ op-ed What Woodrow Wilson Cost My Grandfather. It is still generating debate. (Gordon Davis and I are both âalumniâ of the Northern Student Movement, a 1960s civil rights group.) Davis was writing in the context of the student-led protest at Princeton University over the veneration of its former president, Woodrow Wilson. The controversy stems from Wilsonâs viciously racist speech and behavior particularly when he was president of the United States.
A subsequent Truthout article by Harvey Wasserman, âPrinceton Students Are Right, Woodrow Wilson Was Way Worse Than You Think,â complements the critique. Most of the 776 comments on theNY Times article (as well as 1,600 more on a followup Times editorial) were the predictably negative responses usually heard regarding white racism. Many said some version of, âthat was a long time ago when values were different.â Others took the tack that ânobody is perfect and the good things Woodrow Wilson did outweigh the bad of his racism, so let it rest.â
But there was also a substantial undercurrent voiced by those who were open-minded enough to learn.
Following are NY Times comments on the article:
Jim K. New York, NY 2 days ago
As a former Princeton professor, I applaud the students for raising this issue. Itâs not about erasing history, but confronting it honestly. This beautiful column makes clear how Wilsonâs policies, based on his deeply racist and white-supremacist views, destroyed the lives of thousands of black families. Why should we publicly venerate this person? Why should elitist Northern universities get to insist that we overlook this manâs systematic, consequential racism, while every Southern municipality and retail store is expected to rid itself of monuments and souvenirs of their racist politicians and soldiers. Letâs indeed, every American community, take stock of the deeply embedded racism that has been a part of our history (North and South), recognizing that a thoroughgoing accounting will involve reconfiguring our public and institutional spaces in many ways. Because that has yet to be done, and the younger generation of Black militants will, rightly, not be content until it is.
JPBarnett Santa Barbara 1 day ago
Itâs sad that after having been through 12 years of grade school in CA and graduating from a UC, I just learned this about Wilson. Itâs silly that Iâm surprised I didnât learn of his racism I suppose, but Iâm glad I do now. My opinion is forever changed.
Many commenters were startled to learn about a long known but rarely taught side of Woodrow Wilson. White people have a lot to be surprised about. The very nature of white supremacy requires sanitized teaching about slavery, the genocide of indigenous people, the reach of U.S. militarism and many other topics.
Fortunately, gains from past struggles give African Americans increased opportunities to expose what was previously deliberately obscured. Ta-Nehisi Coates is the best known of a new generation of black, indigenous, Hispanic and white writers, scholars and activists revealing ugly realities hidden from most of us.
Even the New York Times conservative columnist David Brooks has acknowledged this development. âSo much of the national conversation this year has concerned how to think about past racism and oppression, and the power of that past to shape present realities: the Confederate flag, Woodrow Wilson, the unmarked sights of the lynching grounds. Fortunately, many people have found the courage to tell the ugly truths about slavery, Jim Crow and current racism that were repressed by the wider culture.â
Admittedly, new information does not necessarily translate into social change. Cherished and deeply rooted beliefs are not easily surrendered. I often think of how long it took for the arguments of Copernicus and Galileo that the earth revolved around the sun, not the other way around, to be accepted. Ideas and habits are stubborn. Systems resist change. Powerful institutions have vested interests in preserving the status quo.
By way of example, a recurring concern of those responding to the Timesâ Woodrow Wilson op-ed was, âWhere will it all end? Will we have to destroy Mount Rushmore?â some asked. Maybe we should. Not just because it honors slave owners Jefferson and Washington, Mount Rushmore is also a powerful symbol of brutality and racism toward indigenous people.
As idigenous scholar Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz points out in her book, An Indigenous Peoplesâ History of the United States, âThe most prominent struggle has been the Lakota Siouxâs attempt to restore the Paha Sapa, or Black Hills, where the odious Mount Rushmore carvings have scarred the sacred site. Called the âShrine of Democracyâ by the federal government, it is anything but that; rather it is a shrine of in-your-face illegal occupation and colonization.â
White racism distorts how we think about virtually everything, including history itself. No one will dismiss Bill OâReillyâs goofy books about Jesus or Lincoln or Patton or Reagan as irrelevant because, âoh, that was a long time ago, itâs got nothing to do with me now.â As a general proposition people appreciate that we can discover in the present important things we didnât previously know about the past.
Not so when it comes to race in the USA. Not for some people anyway.
This matters a great deal. In many years of anti-racist work, I have discovered that whites who deny any connection to the racism of the past will also generally deny any connection to the racism of the present. âPlease donât tell me,â cry deniers of systemic white racism. One step removed is the view that we should âacceptâ the history but must take the good with the bad. This is sometimes known as the âwarts and allâ theory of history. A variation is the convenient idea that slavery was the âoriginal sin.â Sin, of course, in the Western Christian point of view is inevitable and immutable.
This takes an especially pernicious twist when white racism deniers argue that there has always been slavery as though that itself somehow makes it justified. Itâs not true that every society over all time has enslaved people. But even if it were true, the kind of slavery on which the U.S. was built is unlike any other that preceded it. It co-evolved with capitalism and it conflated slavery with âraceââplantation capitalism as the Rev. James Lawson calls it. CSU Fresno scholars Blain Roberts and Ethan J. Kytle put it this way recently in theNew York Times: âNew research has gone further, exposing how American capitalism and democracy â once thought to be antithetical to slavery â emerged hand-in-hand with it.â
Hard as it may be for propaganda-conditioned whites to grasp, global race-based capitalism is not a system of the past with lingering effects. It is a living, breathing organism of the present. It is a unitary thing. It is therefore not a good thing with warts. It is one thing. The âgoodâ things always comes packaged with the âbadâ thing. The mechanics of how it often works has a name: grand bargains.
The mother of all grand bargains is the U.S. Constitution which accommodated slavery in several ways, including the notorious three-fifths clause. While the Constitution was by no means the first grand bargain, it solidified a pattern that continues to this day. The New Deal, as Ira Katznelson demonstrates in his book Fear Itself, was another grand bargain that combined âprogressiveâ achievements such as union rights and Social Security with reaffirming the power of Dixiecrats and the institutions of Jim Crow.
Katznelson is white. So am I. So are many others now writing and speaking honestly and openly about the enduring power of white racism. That is valuable because it strengthens the idea that whites can come to terms with reality, past and present, as opposed to the myths we are encouraged to believe. As we do so, another world does become possible.
Of course white people canât âsaveâ the world. That mindset is the problem not the solution. But we can help. As Vietnam antiwar leader Rennie Davis points out, it is when we stop being invisible to each other that we start to become a movement.
Again, a lot of the accounts of atrocities were from a single source. I tend to distrust historical accounts by people with an agenda.
Who is this idiot? Another self-hating white. Ah.
When are we to learn about black genocide in Africa? Asian genocide in Asia?
Anyone who doesn’t see the end game is the extermination of Whites,Christians,Jews and Conservatives to build the socialist utopia needs to read the history of the October Revolution or Mao’s China. Save the revolution! Kill the Kulaks! Smash all class enemies!
I thought leftists believed in natural selection. If the white man has been on top for 500 years there is a reason for it ...we all started from the same place.
You are welcome. It is a dirty rotten shame on our education system that so few people have even heard of Norman Borlag, one of the greatest men in history, IMHO.
And much of Asia, the Indian sub-continent and Africa are civilized thanks to the British colonialist.
The recipients may resent it, but they live better lives today because of their benefactors.
Where do you get that Cruz is “half-white”?
People that are of real Hispanic ethnicity (we’re not talking border jumping wets) are white.
How so many can be so dumb to believe this vomit is the question.
I think that if they truly believed that white men are so terrible, that they would stop using anything that was invented or produced by one. Then they could show just how well a person could live without supporting the white man and his ideas. It would show real devotion to the cause. Wonder if they could do it?
My ex-wife is a study in the political schizophrenia that is modern liberalism. She is the child of Christian converts from Islam from Pakistan. They had the benefit of European education and being immersed in the Christian missonary community. Her parents came to the US to escape the persecution they faced, even though it meant a major drop in status and income. But all the kids went through college and some got advanced degrees. But even as she as an immigration lawyer tells immigrants to learn to think like white men, she also has lost her family’s historical memory of what Islam can do. She apologizes to Islam when Islam should be apologizing to her. Strange. She went down this path when we came to Pennsylvania. I didn’t. I guess that’s a reason we are no longer married.
Indeed, 500 appears to be a magic number for these mendacious nitwits.
No group of people is perfect, but better than 90% of the world's contributions concerning science, medicine, and technology was made by white Europeans.
The great, overwhelming pct. of non-Europeans killed or harshly treated in the history of the world was by other non-Europeans. The great slaughters of the 20th century were not only Europeans killing other Europeans, it was also Asians killing other Asians. This article is another reason why I despise leftists.
Just another front in Satan’s war against God and His people.
The war on white people heats up.
Sure, if not for white men, we wouldn’t have a civilization at all. What was it like in Africa, Asia, Middle East in the 1700’s? Well, the Middle East was pretty much the same, stuck in the 600’s.
This biography is posted at the Michigan Council for Human Rights
.
Frank Joyce has been a political activist since the civil rights movement. He worked with the Northern Student Movement (NSM), helped to found People Against Racism (PAR) in the late 1960âs and has been involved in many labor, anti-racist, human rights and anti-war campaigns since. Frank has worked in factories, retail establishments and a number of media organizations, including WDET and WTVS. He has won journalism awards in print, radio and television. Frank was a member of the UAW International Union staff for eighteen years, including twelve years as Director of the Public Relations Department. Currently, he is a Communications Consultant to labor and community organizations.Frank is President of the board of The Working Group (TWG), a California based non-profit media production company that supports the anti-hate movement âNot In Our Town (NIOT)â. His writing has been published at AlterNet (www.alternet.org) and elsewhere. Every Sunday afternoon, Frank contributes during the last hour of Dave Marshâs âLand of Hopes and Dreamsâ radio program, which airs on SiriusXM Radio channel 127 from 1-4 PM Eastern time. He and his wife, Mary Anne Barnett, have 3 adult sons and three grandchildren. They live in Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan.
He is interviewed at length here: Interview with Frank Joyce on Detroit.
Also, here is some information about his involvement with Communists in the 1970s, he was apparently a boyhood friend of Tom Hayden and worked with his defense on the Chicago 7 trial. Here is a excerpt from a book, via Google books Detroit: I do mind dying
I know, heritage from Spain, I get it. Ask someone from Cuba if they are white or not. Not arguing with you. I am curious what answer may come out oh their mouths. Could be an interesting exercise
What if they're black?
Penned by a racist misandrist.
Intolerance of achievement, intolerance of religion, intolerance of inventiveness, striving, struggling, competetivness, succcess, application, charity, democracy... A deep misunderstanding of what constitutes social justice.
This fool advocates Harrison Bergeron’s hell...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.