Posted on 12/23/2015 2:07:06 PM PST by Altura Ct.
For 500 years, they've exploited their fellow man and plundered the planet. It's time they reign themselves in
The future of life on the planet depends on bringing the 500-year rampage of the white man to a halt. For five centuries his ever more destructive weaponry has become far too common. His widespread and better systems of exploiting other humans and nature dominate the globe. The time for replacing white supremacy with new values is now. And just as some whites played a part in ending slavery, colonialism, Jim Crow segregation, and South African apartheid, there is surely a role whites can play in restraining other whites in this era. Beneath the sound and fury generated by GOP presidential candidates, Fox News, website trolls, police unions and others, white people are becoming aware as never before of past and present racism.
Admittedly, this encouraging development is hardly the dominant view. To the contrary, given the possibility that Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Ben Carson or one of their ilk might become president, white supremacist ideology seems to be digging in harder than ever.
I donât take this lightly. Once upon a time I foolishly thought that there was no way that Ronald Reagan could get elected president. Lesson learned. Now is the time to start contingency planning for intensified resistance to mass deportations of immigrants, atrocities against Muslims and extreme danger to African Americans.
That said, it would be a mistake to focus only on the negative. Recently theNew York Times ran Gordon Davisâ op-ed What Woodrow Wilson Cost My Grandfather. It is still generating debate. (Gordon Davis and I are both âalumniâ of the Northern Student Movement, a 1960s civil rights group.) Davis was writing in the context of the student-led protest at Princeton University over the veneration of its former president, Woodrow Wilson. The controversy stems from Wilsonâs viciously racist speech and behavior particularly when he was president of the United States.
A subsequent Truthout article by Harvey Wasserman, âPrinceton Students Are Right, Woodrow Wilson Was Way Worse Than You Think,â complements the critique. Most of the 776 comments on theNY Times article (as well as 1,600 more on a followup Times editorial) were the predictably negative responses usually heard regarding white racism. Many said some version of, âthat was a long time ago when values were different.â Others took the tack that ânobody is perfect and the good things Woodrow Wilson did outweigh the bad of his racism, so let it rest.â
But there was also a substantial undercurrent voiced by those who were open-minded enough to learn.
Following are NY Times comments on the article:
Jim K. New York, NY 2 days ago
As a former Princeton professor, I applaud the students for raising this issue. Itâs not about erasing history, but confronting it honestly. This beautiful column makes clear how Wilsonâs policies, based on his deeply racist and white-supremacist views, destroyed the lives of thousands of black families. Why should we publicly venerate this person? Why should elitist Northern universities get to insist that we overlook this manâs systematic, consequential racism, while every Southern municipality and retail store is expected to rid itself of monuments and souvenirs of their racist politicians and soldiers. Letâs indeed, every American community, take stock of the deeply embedded racism that has been a part of our history (North and South), recognizing that a thoroughgoing accounting will involve reconfiguring our public and institutional spaces in many ways. Because that has yet to be done, and the younger generation of Black militants will, rightly, not be content until it is.
JPBarnett Santa Barbara 1 day ago
Itâs sad that after having been through 12 years of grade school in CA and graduating from a UC, I just learned this about Wilson. Itâs silly that Iâm surprised I didnât learn of his racism I suppose, but Iâm glad I do now. My opinion is forever changed.
Many commenters were startled to learn about a long known but rarely taught side of Woodrow Wilson. White people have a lot to be surprised about. The very nature of white supremacy requires sanitized teaching about slavery, the genocide of indigenous people, the reach of U.S. militarism and many other topics.
Fortunately, gains from past struggles give African Americans increased opportunities to expose what was previously deliberately obscured. Ta-Nehisi Coates is the best known of a new generation of black, indigenous, Hispanic and white writers, scholars and activists revealing ugly realities hidden from most of us.
Even the New York Times conservative columnist David Brooks has acknowledged this development. âSo much of the national conversation this year has concerned how to think about past racism and oppression, and the power of that past to shape present realities: the Confederate flag, Woodrow Wilson, the unmarked sights of the lynching grounds. Fortunately, many people have found the courage to tell the ugly truths about slavery, Jim Crow and current racism that were repressed by the wider culture.â
Admittedly, new information does not necessarily translate into social change. Cherished and deeply rooted beliefs are not easily surrendered. I often think of how long it took for the arguments of Copernicus and Galileo that the earth revolved around the sun, not the other way around, to be accepted. Ideas and habits are stubborn. Systems resist change. Powerful institutions have vested interests in preserving the status quo.
By way of example, a recurring concern of those responding to the Timesâ Woodrow Wilson op-ed was, âWhere will it all end? Will we have to destroy Mount Rushmore?â some asked. Maybe we should. Not just because it honors slave owners Jefferson and Washington, Mount Rushmore is also a powerful symbol of brutality and racism toward indigenous people.
As idigenous scholar Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz points out in her book, An Indigenous Peoplesâ History of the United States, âThe most prominent struggle has been the Lakota Siouxâs attempt to restore the Paha Sapa, or Black Hills, where the odious Mount Rushmore carvings have scarred the sacred site. Called the âShrine of Democracyâ by the federal government, it is anything but that; rather it is a shrine of in-your-face illegal occupation and colonization.â
White racism distorts how we think about virtually everything, including history itself. No one will dismiss Bill OâReillyâs goofy books about Jesus or Lincoln or Patton or Reagan as irrelevant because, âoh, that was a long time ago, itâs got nothing to do with me now.â As a general proposition people appreciate that we can discover in the present important things we didnât previously know about the past.
Not so when it comes to race in the USA. Not for some people anyway.
This matters a great deal. In many years of anti-racist work, I have discovered that whites who deny any connection to the racism of the past will also generally deny any connection to the racism of the present. âPlease donât tell me,â cry deniers of systemic white racism. One step removed is the view that we should âacceptâ the history but must take the good with the bad. This is sometimes known as the âwarts and allâ theory of history. A variation is the convenient idea that slavery was the âoriginal sin.â Sin, of course, in the Western Christian point of view is inevitable and immutable.
This takes an especially pernicious twist when white racism deniers argue that there has always been slavery as though that itself somehow makes it justified. Itâs not true that every society over all time has enslaved people. But even if it were true, the kind of slavery on which the U.S. was built is unlike any other that preceded it. It co-evolved with capitalism and it conflated slavery with âraceââplantation capitalism as the Rev. James Lawson calls it. CSU Fresno scholars Blain Roberts and Ethan J. Kytle put it this way recently in theNew York Times: âNew research has gone further, exposing how American capitalism and democracy â once thought to be antithetical to slavery â emerged hand-in-hand with it.â
Hard as it may be for propaganda-conditioned whites to grasp, global race-based capitalism is not a system of the past with lingering effects. It is a living, breathing organism of the present. It is a unitary thing. It is therefore not a good thing with warts. It is one thing. The âgoodâ things always comes packaged with the âbadâ thing. The mechanics of how it often works has a name: grand bargains.
The mother of all grand bargains is the U.S. Constitution which accommodated slavery in several ways, including the notorious three-fifths clause. While the Constitution was by no means the first grand bargain, it solidified a pattern that continues to this day. The New Deal, as Ira Katznelson demonstrates in his book Fear Itself, was another grand bargain that combined âprogressiveâ achievements such as union rights and Social Security with reaffirming the power of Dixiecrats and the institutions of Jim Crow.
Katznelson is white. So am I. So are many others now writing and speaking honestly and openly about the enduring power of white racism. That is valuable because it strengthens the idea that whites can come to terms with reality, past and present, as opposed to the myths we are encouraged to believe. As we do so, another world does become possible.
Of course white people canât âsaveâ the world. That mindset is the problem not the solution. But we can help. As Vietnam antiwar leader Rennie Davis points out, it is when we stop being invisible to each other that we start to become a movement.
White is the new n*****.
It might help to understand what this writer defines as “white”. I have seen blacks who are white, “white Hispanics”, and historically Italians, Jews, and Irish were not white. Are Spaniards white? What about Russians west of the Urals? Can any Muslim be considered white? Mostly what he means are any people who are practicing what used to be known as “Western Civilization”. More to the point his problem is with the dominance of western thought and religions.
Has the writer even SEEN Ben Carson?
Do these âstudentsâ wish to revert back to about the 7th century???
But, of course, there will also be a Liberal Elite of White people who hold the reins of power & skim from the wealth transfer bonanza while simultaneously apologizing for their own existence.
Bring it.
That is why they say White MEN. Hillary, of course, is a White Woman—that doesn’t count.
Sorry.
We've decided that after taking the last 70 years off, it's time we got off our assess and take the trash out.
Folks, there's a reason why the world fears the White man.
Good for us for taking up the burden of Civilization.
Really going scorched earth on the white man this last year.
The author apparently thinks it is cool to be racist.
Wow, well, thanks for the hot Latina all the same, fellah...
Guess what? Moreno kids, young adults now, raised to love America!
Acclimation level: CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN AMERICANS! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
To hear eloquent reiteration of this theme go to YouTube and search for Khalid al Mansour’s lectures. There were close to one hundred a few years ago. He was Percy Sutton’s and Vernon Jarrett’s friend who solicited help for Barry’s admission to Harvard Law, according to Percy Sutton. Sutton’s 2008 description of Al Mansour’s request for help from Percy remains, amazingly enough with all the scrubbing of YouTube and Google archives we have seen. Sutton, a remarkable Texas-born attorney, who flew for the Army Air Corp’s black battalion, was formerly the President of the Manhattan Borough, attorney to Malcolm X, Louis Farrakhan, Muslim Brotherhood, Charles Rangel, and many other powerful black figures.
Mansour used to lecture on the need to kill white men regularly on his weekly radio program from Oakland California during his sojourn as a law student at U.C.’s Boalt Hall. He seemed even more concerned of the need to kill white women and their babies because they were the source of the future solders of the white devils. Al Mansour was simply expressing, entirely consistent with the Quran, of the need to convert or kill infidels; most white people are infidels. At the time al Mansour was also helping to found the Black Panthers, and was known by his birth name, Don Warden. After law school he opened his first law office in San Francisco under his Wahhabi name, Khalid al Mansour with his partner, Alwaleed bin-Talal, who was not a lawyer, but had attended Menlo College, a small private college in tony Atherton California at the time Warden was attending Boalt.
Bin-Talal now controls over 95% of Saudi Investments, including the largest external (not Murdoch family) block of News Corp, which owns Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, many other publishing interests. He also has major investments is Cisco, Citibank, Twitter, GE, etc. etc. (Why else would those, including many Republican politicians, discourage domestic development, including Keystone, and pump fictional replacements such as solar and wind power?
These are simply facts, easily confirmed by listening to Warden/al Mansour’s YouTube lectures spanning at least 30 years, and to Percy’s interview on New York public service television. By searching a bit you can read Vernon Jarrett (yes, Valarie’s father-in-law) writing in the Chicago Tribune about al-Mansour’s venture to spend twenty million dollars each year to “educate” minority U.S. citizens. This article was first published in 1979, just as Barry was beginning at Occidental.
The first 20 million dollar contribution from Bin-Talal was made in about 1985, not too far from Barry’s application to Harvard Law. The acknowledgement of the donation was on the Harvard web site until about 2009. It didn’t, that this author recalls, cite Harvard Law as the recipient, but the AL Waleed bin-Talal Center for Islamic Study became the most prominent division of Harvard Divinity School for several years before it was quietly depreciated. Bin Talal has since opened similar operations at Georgetown, American University, Cambridge, and probably more. These donations and centers are not illegal, but they are clearly to buy influence. Decide for yourselves if Muslim Brotherhood-influenced education will make us a better Judeo-Christian society?
Al-Mansour has been one of Alwaleed’s principal legal tools for over 40 years, and converted to Wahhabi Islam in the 1950s (much earlier than our CIA Director, John Brennan, who converted in the late 90s, according to retired Commander of the Pacific Fleet, Admiral James Lyons). This suggests that Barry has been a project since his talents were recognized by Frank Marshall Davis, Jarrett’s one time publishing partner of the Communist paper from Chicago, and before Jarrett ended up at the Chicago Tribune. The media are just now discovering the Black Nationalist movement of “Reverend” Wright, Jarrett, Marshall Davis, and skillfully inspired, if not instigated, by the KGB. Marshal Davis who was a card carrying communist like many among the black intelligentsia.
Yeah, the Democrats are just putting up three white males. What hypocrites.
A bit narrow in the frontral lobes.
;)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.