[grania]

As president, he will appoint people who can assure that construction jobs are done correctly. As far as not knowing "nuclear triad"? If I had to answer that, I'd be guessing. It's not a common term. Why don't we just give them all a current events test and determine how many would pass a "gotcha questions" test?

CW, I just don't get it why you don't see the need for a strong leader who can win and make excellent appointments. Is Trump perfect? No. Who is? But, mygosh, look how much he's shaken things up in this election already.

PS: I still want a time machine. Think how different the world would be today if we'd gotten Quayle/Forbes instead of GWB's cronies buying that nomination before anyone was ready to stop them.

[fieldmarshaldj]

Quayle’s political judgment was not the best. He took Nixon’s advice and moved to Arizona where he completely faded away. He needed to run for Governor of Indiana in 1996 to prove his leadership mettle. Marilyn Quayle should’ve run for Senator against Evan Bayh in 1998.

As for Forbes, he should’ve run for Governor of New Jersey in 2001 and spared the state the McGreevey-Corzine horror.

[Cincinatus' Wife]

My problem with Trump isn’t that he can’t appoint people to do what he wants, it’s what he wants that bothers me.

His history (which is long and runs to today) is liberal.

He TALKS and then he walks it back.

I cannot trust this man.

Ah, Forbes - imagine (but Freepers said he talked funny and his religion wasn’t good enough). His flat-tax looks pretty good, doesn’t it?