Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The fall of America signals the rise of the new world order
Personal Liberty ^ | 12/1/2015 | Brandon Smith

Posted on 12/01/2015 5:05:06 AM PST by HomerBohn

"The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another." -- Henry Kissinger, "Henry Kissinger On The Assembly Of A New World Order"

"[P]art of people's concern is just the sense that around the world the old order isn't holding and we're not quite yet to where we need to be in terms of a new order that's based on a different set of principles, that's based on a sense of common humanity, that's based on economies that work for all people." -- Barack Obama

"We reiterate our strong commitment to the United Nations (UN) as the foremost multilateral forum entrusted with bringing about hope, peace, order and sustainable development to the world. The UN enjoys universal membership and is at the center of global governance and multilateralism." -- Fifth BRICS Summit Declaration

"We support the reform and improvement of the international monetary system, with a broad-based international reserve currency system providing stability and certainty. We welcome the discussion about the role of the SDR in the existing international monetary system including the composition of SDR's basket of currencies. We support the IMF to make its surveillance framework more integrated and even-handed." -- Fifth BRICS Summit Declaration

Here is where many political and economic analysts go terribly wrong in their examination of current global paradigms: They tend to blindly believe the mainstream narrative rather than taking into account conflicting actions and statements by political and financial leaders. Even in the liberty movement, composed of some of the most skeptical and media savvy people on planet Earth, the cancers of assumption and bias often take hold.

Some liberty proponents are more than happy to believe in particular mainstream dynamics. They are happy to believe, for example, that the growing "conflict" between the East and West is legitimate rather than engineered.

You can list off quotation after quotation and policy action after policy action proving that Eastern governments, including China and Russia, work hand in hand with globalist institutions like the International Monetary Fund, the Bank of International Settlements, the World Bank and the U.N. toward the goal of global governance and global economic centralization. But these people simply will not listen. They must believe that the U.S. is the crowning villain, and that the East is in heroic opposition. They are so desperate for a taste of hope they are ready to consume the poison of false dichotomies.

The liberty movement is infatuated with the presumption that the U.S. government and the banking elites surrounding it are at the "top" of the new world order pyramid and are "clamoring for survival" as the U.S. economy crumbles under the facade of false government and central banking statistics. How many times have we heard over the past year alone that the Federal Reserve has "backed itself into a corner" or policy directed itself "between a rock and a hard place?"

I have to laugh at the absurdity of such a viewpoint because central bankers and internationalists have always used economic instability as a means to gain political and social advantage. The consolidation of world banking power alone after the Great Depression is a testament to this fact. And even former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has admitted (at least in certain respects) that the Federal Reserve was responsible for that terrible implosion, an implosion that conveniently served the interests of international cartel banks like JPMorgan.

But the Federal Reserve is no more than an appendage of a greater system; it is not the brains of the operation.

In his book "Tragedy And Hope," Carroll Quigley, Council on Foreign Relations member and mentor to Bill Clinton, stated:

It must not be felt that these heads of the world's chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down. The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called "international" or "merchant" bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.

In "Ruling the world of money," Harper's Magazine established what Quigley admitted in "Tragedy And Hope" -- that the control of the global economic policy and, by extension, political policy is dominated by a select few elites, namely through the unaccountable institutional framework of the BIS.

The U.S. and the Federal Reserve are mere tentacles of the great vampire squid that is the new world order. And being a tentacle makes one, to a certain extent, expendable, if the trade will result in even greater centralization of power.

The delusion that some people within the liberty movement are under is that the fall of America will result in the fall of the new world order. In reality, the fall of America is a necessary step towards the rise of the new world order. The Rothschild-owned financial magazine The Economist reaffirmed this trend of economic "harmonization" in its 1988 article "Get ready for a world currency by 2018," which described the creation of a global currency called the "Phoenix" over three decades:

The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate -- and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate -- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case.

...

The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.

We are now on the cusp of the "prediction" set forth by the economist 27 years ago. The BRICS nations, including Vladimir Putin's Russia, have all consistently called for the formation of a global reserve currency system under the direct control of the IMF and predicated on the basket methodology of the SDR. This new global system, as The Economist suggested, requires the marginalization of existing power structures and the end of sovereign economic control. Governments around the world including the U.S. would be at the fiscal mercy of the new financial high priests through the use of new debt based incentives given or withheld at the whim of the IMF.

China is set to be inducted into the SDR basket in 2015, with specific economic changes to be made by September, a development I have been warning about for years. A final vote is to commence this week, though the decision is largely expected to pass after the IMF already gave its approval, with head Christine Lagarde signing off. The addition of China to the SDR, I believe, is the next trigger event for the continuing removal of the dollar as the world reserve currency. The monetary shift may explode with speed if Saudi Arabia follows through with a plan to depeg from the dollar, effectively ending the petrodollar status the U.S. has enjoyed for decades.

This is, of course, the same IMF-controlled SDR system that Putin and the Kremlin have called for, despite the running fantasy that Putin is somehow an opponent of the globalists.

Putin continues to press the "U.S. as bumbling villain" narrative, while at the same time supporting globalist institutions and the internationalization of economic and political governance. While many people were overly focused on his "calling out" of the U.S. and its involvement in the creation of ISIS in his recent speech at the U.N., they seemed to have completely overlooked his adoration of the United Nations and the development of a global governing body. Putin often speaks at cross purposes just as Barack Obama does -- one minute supporting sovereignty and freedom, the next minute calling for global centralization:

Russia is ready to work together with its partners to develop the UN further on the basis of a broad consensus, but we consider any attempts to undermine the legitimacy of the United Nations as extremely dangerous. They may result in the collapse of the entire architecture of international relations, and then indeed there will be no rules left except for the rule of force.

...

Dear colleagues, ensuring peace and global and regional stability remains a key task for the international community guided by the United Nations. We believe this means creating an equal and indivisible security environment that would not serve a privileged few, but everyone.

Indeed, it has been Putin's intention all along to support and defend the internationalist framework while at the same time participating in the theatrical East versus West false paradigm:

In the BRICS case we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests.

First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank's decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this.

It is rather interesting how the desires of the BRICS seem to directly coincide with the designs of international bankers. This Hegelian dialectic is perhaps the most elaborate public distraction of all time, with the ultimate solution to the artificially engineered problem being a single "multilateral" but centrally dictated world economic system and world government, i.e., the new world order.

Again, the globalists at the BIS and the IMF require a diminished U.S. dollar, greatly reduced U.S. living standards and a much smaller U.S. geopolitical footprint before they can establish and finalize a single global elitist oligarchy.

If you cannot understand why it seems that the Federal Reserve and U.S. government appear hell-bent on self-destruction, then perhaps you should consider the facts at hand. Then, you'll realize it is their job to destroy America, not save America. When you are finally willing to accept this fact, every disastrous development since the inception of the Fed a century ago, as well as all that is about to happen in the next few years, makes perfect sense.

This is not to say that the ultimate endgame of the new world order will result in victory. But the cold, hard, concrete evidence shows that internationalists do have a plan; they are implementing that plan systematically; and all major governments around the world are participating in that plan. This plan involves the inevitable collapse and reformation of America into a Third World enclave, a goal that is nearly complete, as I will outline in my next article.

As the U.S. destabilizes, we are not escaping the clutches of the Federal Reserve system, only trading out one totalitarian management model for another. It is absolutely vital that the liberty movement in particular finally and fully embrace this reality. If we do not, then there will truly be no obstacle to such a plan's success and no end to the tyrannies of the old world or the new world.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nwo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: HomerBohn
All Well and good but I can't say I believe any of this crap. Can someone explain how the Federal Reserve is my biggest problem and enemy? While I think it should be abolished, I don't see the Fed as the source of the problem.

The source of the problem is government confiscation of wealth through direct and indirect taxes.

The Government is taxing away more than fifty percent of my earnings. THAT IS THE PROBLEM.

When individuals have the ability to accumulate wealth ALL these other problems will go away including the "Fed".

Poor people are controlled people, it's that simple. I will repeat a rhetorical question that I have always asked over the years to illustrate my point. The question is.

What do rich people do?

The answer is "anything they want" and thus the key to solving all these problems is the accumulation of individual wealth.

Get the government out of our pockets and we won't have to worry about any of these corrupt central banks because we will own them.

21 posted on 12/01/2015 7:01:53 AM PST by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
Americans still have too much to lose. No one wants to miss their kids lives sitting in a 6x9 cell.

One day though, Americans will have had enough of this treason. People in this country putting the interest of foreigners before Americans, continually robbing the treasury and shifting wealth covertly, when that day comes and Americans feel destitute, with little hope, bankrupt monetarily...fill in the blank.

22 posted on 12/01/2015 7:12:10 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03

Folks think they can fight this, but it’s been written about and has had God’s stamp of approval on it since eternity’s past. He won’t change it.

Like Noah and Lot, God will once again step into our realm and remove those SAVED by Him to impart judgement on an evil world.

Folks can mock this all they want, they are unwittingly fulfilling Biblical Prophecy by doing so (2 Peter 3:3-7).


23 posted on 12/01/2015 7:43:30 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sport

Then there’s the whole Agenda 2030 deal. Which is literally the headstamp of a OWG/NWO.

Somebody with Biblical foresight suggested this looking back at the Olivet Discourse where Jesus discussed the future last kingdom on earth and Israel’s “generation” that would see these things.

Knowing in some Biblical context that 70 years (or 80) is a generation. Jerusalem was captured in 1967.

You must have a 7 year Tribulation Period. 2030 + 7 is 2037.

I’m not a “date-setter”, but it’s fun to speculate.


24 posted on 12/01/2015 7:50:27 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

America is no longer considered by anyone to be the leader of the Free World, or anything/anywhere else, and the cause is, quite simply, the feckless and utterly gormless Barack Obama and his benighted stewardship.


25 posted on 12/01/2015 8:13:17 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

LOL with your sense of humor you can live to 120, if God allows. :)


26 posted on 12/01/2015 8:28:54 AM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

Only as long as you choose to remain in that state.


27 posted on 12/01/2015 8:30:40 AM PST by COBOL2Java (I'll vote for Jeb when Terri Schiavo endorses him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

It’s not the fed per se, “It must not be felt that these heads of the world’s chief central banks were themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were not. Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were perfectly capable of throwing them down.”

So while we all get mad at the transparent Soros, there are many more who do exactly what he does but behind the curtain. “The substantive financial powers of the world were in the hands of these investment bankers (also called “international” or “merchant” bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international cooperation and national dominance which was more private, more powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks.”


28 posted on 12/01/2015 8:34:50 AM PST by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

And once this turd (Barack Hussein Obama) leaves office and the $hit hits the fan, whom ever is up next with be saddled with the blame. See how it works.


29 posted on 12/01/2015 8:41:44 AM PST by CodeJockey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15
It is these people along with others such as those right here on FR who think Obama is better in the WH than a Republican who doesn't check off every box on their Conservative "must have" list who will bear all the responsibility even though we all will pay equally.

But you're not mad at the GOPe who shoved a lousy, weak, loser candidate down the voter's throats, are you? You remember, the guy who let Candy Crowley walk all over him in the second debate, and couldn't inspire people to vote for him? You don't lay any blame on the GOPe power brokers at all for that loss, eh? No of course, it's all the fault of the conservatives...

Check out that smug look on Obama's face. He new Romney was pwned. He also knew the GOPe candidate wouldn't fight back. That's the moment when the race was lost.

30 posted on 12/01/2015 8:43:02 AM PST by COBOL2Java (I'll vote for Jeb when Terri Schiavo endorses him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

It would really help if the establishment pick didn’t stump for the other party’s candidate:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1076999/McCain-appears-concede-lose-telling-voters-We-fear-Barack-Obama-White-House.html


31 posted on 12/01/2015 8:47:24 AM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

VERY good post. I get so tired of those who keep wanting to shovel blame on those who refused to participate in the Uniparty’s (GOPe) ‘clever’ little illusion that they were offering a choice, when in fact it was lost in the primary. After the primary it was just 2 sides of the same coin. The Uniparty absolutely positively rigs it that way to give the illusion that people still have some say in the matter. That is why they despise Trump, and to a *slightly* lesser degree, Cruz. Neither has agreed to be a face on the Uniparty’s coin, wheras Mitt had been raised by his daddy, and groomed while governor to be a face on the Uniparty coin. It really didn’t matter at that point if it was Barry or Mitt. At that point either will march to the Uniparty drum, dragging the country along with them, differing only in pace. Trump and (hopefully) Cruz reject that paradigm, which upsets the Uniparty apple cart, bringing it to a halt for four years, as well as giving opportunity for the Uniparty apples to rot.


32 posted on 12/01/2015 9:10:07 AM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn; SaveFerris; metmom; MHGinTN; pastorbillrandles; xzins; cuban leaf

Come quickly Lord Jesus.


33 posted on 12/01/2015 9:11:21 AM PST by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_Wing_Madman

The cards will collapse by the fall of 2017. That is the time Israel signs up for peace by the antichrist rule. [See the prophecies for Jerusalem, from Judah ben Samuel, 1217]


34 posted on 12/01/2015 11:00:07 AM PST by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03

correct


35 posted on 12/01/2015 11:13:25 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GnuThere

Yep. Virtually-pointless to talk to many of them. I count among them some former friends or ones that I haven’t been close to lately. Sure, they pay a bit higher prices for some food items and they hear things, but for them time marches on and not that much has changed. Or so they think.


36 posted on 12/01/2015 11:17:40 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

amen


37 posted on 12/01/2015 11:18:08 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java; PROCON; Gamecock; Larry Lucido; FredZarguna

She has man hands! At least we know the Uniparty pays her well enough to eat.


38 posted on 12/01/2015 11:20:15 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CodeJockey

Been saying that, too. This charade cannot continue. 1/2 of America is in complete denial of the past 7 years. I personally think it’s part of the end-times deception starting. I’m shocked by masses of people who cannot figure out obvious lies, tricks and deception. Guess I shouldn’t be.


39 posted on 12/01/2015 11:22:32 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Roman_War_Criminal

[You must have a 7 year Tribulation Period]

correct


40 posted on 12/01/2015 11:24:47 AM PST by SaveFerris (Be a blessing to a stranger today for some have entertained angels unaware)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson