1 posted on
11/21/2015 7:05:26 PM PST by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: Kaslin
Andy has a case of the vapors.
L
2 posted on
11/21/2015 7:07:36 PM PST by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: Kaslin
Is it safe to assume that there is already a register of all legal immigrants and refugees entering the U.S.A. If not, why not?
To: Kaslin
Why waste all of this ink on a reportedly statement. Reportedly from conservative haters, liars, and dishonest knuckleheads.
5 posted on
11/21/2015 7:10:05 PM PST by
doosee
(Captain, we are approaching a new level of Hell.)
To: Kaslin
The Uniparty is on a mission, destroy Trump. FUUP, go Trump!
6 posted on
11/21/2015 7:12:01 PM PST by
jpsb
(Believe nothing until it has been officially denied, Otto Von Bismarck)
To: Kaslin
I don’t want Muslim immigrants to be registered into a database based on their religion.
I want ALL immigrants to be registered into a database.
Just like all AMERICANS are registered into a database.
8 posted on
11/21/2015 7:13:25 PM PST by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: Kaslin
He never said it. Get over it Andrew, I would like to think you can hear correctly.
9 posted on
11/21/2015 7:13:58 PM PST by
Fungi
To: Kaslin
Islam falls out of that protection (or should) because it’s text AND interpreters unambiguously encourage the killing, persecution and enslavement of non-believers.
Until those passages are renounced and removed by the ideologies major leaders they can not be trusted and can not fall under Constitutional protections.
12 posted on
11/21/2015 7:15:14 PM PST by
Axenolith
(Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
To: Kaslin; dforest; Fungi; All
13 posted on
11/21/2015 7:16:28 PM PST by
Jane Long
(Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
To: Kaslin
A national-security investigation may "not [be] conducted solely upon the basis of activities protected by the first amendment to the Constitution." That clause, and others similar to it, are found throughout the Patriot Act and other provisions of federal law. They protect Americans from being subjected to surveillance based on nothing except their religious beliefs. Isn't this in direct conflict with immigration law that was posted this week? Did I miss something?
14 posted on
11/21/2015 7:16:29 PM PST by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: Kaslin
Wow. Even
Slate understands Trump's comments were nefariously edited, but
National Review pretends otherwise.
Buckley must be spinning in his grave.
FUNR!
15 posted on
11/21/2015 7:16:44 PM PST by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: Kaslin
Nope. No Trump blunder. He wins again!
To: Kaslin
21 posted on
11/21/2015 7:21:17 PM PST by
Rockitz
(This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
To: Kaslin
Wow. 2001 really was a different era. To think that a law passed as recently as 2001 could assert that "the concept of individual responsibility for wrongdoing is sacrosanct in American society."
For the last seven years everything has been based on collective guilt. Non-Muslims are guilty of disrespecting Islam. White Americans are guilty of benefiting from white privilege and are complicit in the oppression of African Americans, as well as being cowards. White policemen are murderers guilty of brutality against people of color. White-run universities are guilty of failing to root out their racist past and obliterate any traces of it.
Individual responsibility...what a quaint concept. Probably invented by some dead white male.
To: Kaslin
Andy needs to go back and listen to the encounter Trump had with the drive-by. It’s obvious he didn’t hear the question. His response addresses issues like border security, visa tracking, etc., not a database of American Muslims, which would be illegal for the reasons Andy expertly outlines.
23 posted on
11/21/2015 7:22:23 PM PST by
cynwoody
To: Kaslin
A Prezzy no longer has to follow the law.
25 posted on
11/21/2015 7:24:16 PM PST by
Paladin2
(my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
To: Kaslin
28 posted on
11/21/2015 7:26:31 PM PST by
Eddie01
To: Kaslin
29 posted on
11/21/2015 7:26:36 PM PST by
BobL
(Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
To: Kaslin
The ONLY PROBLEM for McCarthy is that MOST REPUBLICANS agree with Trump, and Trump is running in the REPUBLICAN Primary.
Score another for Trump...
31 posted on
11/21/2015 7:27:47 PM PST by
BobL
(Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
To: Kaslin
After all, millions of Muslims believe in the religious tenets but do not want sharia imposed on civic life. For them, Islam is a religion, not a religious veneer on subversion. No.
That's the big lie. Muslims want sharia. Muslims want the Koran. THEY'RE MUSLIMS! They WANT to be Muslims.
If the West actually does die, it will be because of denial, which is cowardice. Comfy Westerners - BILLIONS of them, cannot comprehend people WANTING the savagery of Islam. So, they deny it. They water it down in their minds. They convert it to metaphor. They indulge their fantasies. They seek to appease the savage, animalistic, feral, snarling beast of Islam.
And all Islam sees is food.
33 posted on
11/21/2015 7:29:16 PM PST by
Talisker
(One who commands, must obey.)
To: Kaslin
This shows that even a smart guy like MvCarthy just doesn,t understand what is happening. We want to kick ass and take names and Trump is the guy who will do it for us. Blunder! Please Andy!
34 posted on
11/21/2015 7:31:01 PM PST by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson