Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coopting Article V Convention and the resultant sabotage
11/13/2015 | vanity

Posted on 11/13/2015 2:57:32 AM PST by Fhios

I read earlier today that part of the Campus million student march and one of their "demands" is a change in the constitution to benefit black people.

Two years ago I thought the Article V process was going too slow. Now I'm thinking that unless the Scope of the Article V convention is specific I.E changes to the 17th amendment regarding the election of Senators for Congress, then I rather not go forward at all.

What happens if say NY passes the Article V but includes demands for revisions to say the 2nd amendment, or VA or IL demanding changes to the 1st amendment?

If all the states are not on the same page and targeted within scope, then I just as soon as pass on the Article V.

In no way shape or form do I want even the potential for a full blown constitutional convention, not with our current party apparatus. We'll just get bulldozed over by the progressive and media. Are any of the Candidates specifically on board?

However with more individual States having conservative governors and conservative locks on their bicameral house's, an Article V can be done and can be limited? I think Kentucky is the only unicameral state.

If the Article V is limited in scope, it will be in a protective shell. It cannot be influenced from outside, and the scope cannot be changed from within, even by unanimous consent. I want the conventioneers, and their source legislatures, whoever they may be to sign off on that. Hell, even that doesn't sound safe at this point in time.

My question is: Is the Article V proposals coming from the States being limited in Scope? Or are conservatives going in 'at risk' to being coopted and sabotaged from outside and within?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: articlev; blacklivesmatter; conventionofstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last
To: Fhios

You need a 3/4 super-majority of states for crying out loud. If that many states want to destroy freedom, then we’re all lost anyway.


61 posted on 11/27/2015 7:50:25 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (The DNC's 2012 Convention actually 'booed' God three times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Co-opt and sabotage doesn’t mean they actually pass something. It means they make it impossible to come to any type of 3/4 agreement.

Anyway, I give up on the Article V. All I hear is jump! jump! jump! .... while I see a perfectly good set of stairs to get down.

Please remove me from ARticle V ping list.


62 posted on 11/27/2015 1:48:28 PM PST by Fhios (Anti-depressents aren't a good replacement for a good economy and national pride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Fhios

“Please remove me from ARticle V ping list.”

That’s not my list. You asked the wrong one.


63 posted on 12/05/2015 7:42:41 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (The DNC's 2012 Convention actually 'booed' God three times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson