Skip to comments.
Nuclear fusion just got a boost with the arrival of this stellarator
Fox News ^
| 11/2/2015
| Michael Casey
Posted on 11/03/2015 9:31:14 AM PST by Borges
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
11/03/2015 9:31:14 AM PST
by
Borges
To: Borges
I guess it’ll do until we get dilithium crystals.
2
posted on
11/03/2015 9:32:42 AM PST
by
MUDDOG
To: Borges
3
posted on
11/03/2015 9:33:26 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: Borges
Perfect target for the new Muslim guests.
4
posted on
11/03/2015 9:33:46 AM PST
by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
Yep - somehow, it will be offensive to whatsizname.
5
posted on
11/03/2015 9:42:02 AM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: Borges
First they played with forces they didn’t understand and pushed us into a parallel universe where America spies on it’s own citizens and Russia lectures us on Christian values.
Now with this “Stellerator” they are likely to make us all “Fabulous”.
6
posted on
11/03/2015 9:42:24 AM PST
by
DannyTN
7
posted on
11/03/2015 9:49:47 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...
8
posted on
11/03/2015 9:50:16 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
To: Borges
Back in the heady days of the atomic age, farm implement manufacturer Allis-Chalmers built one of the first stellarators.
9
posted on
11/03/2015 9:51:03 AM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
To: Borges
As I understand it, the Stellarator won't reach full capacity until the Stanlyrator is installed next to it.
A that point it will be ready to blow off a full head of steam. The Stanlyrator will blow off even more, helping to reach the full potential needed for fusion.
- we return your television sets to their normal programming -
Stelaaaaaa.....
10
posted on
11/03/2015 9:52:20 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
To: Red Badger
< img src="xxxxxx.jpg" height=350 >
Try that. You'll like it. = :^)
11
posted on
11/03/2015 9:57:30 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
To: Borges
They'll probably just boil water with it.
Technically we are still in the steam age.
12
posted on
11/03/2015 9:59:32 AM PST
by
rawcatslyentist
(Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
To: Borges
I want my Mr. Fusion...NOW!
13
posted on
11/03/2015 10:03:37 AM PST
by
Paladin2
(my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
14
posted on
11/03/2015 10:19:06 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
To: Borges
Inertial electrostatic confinement.
The concept came about in the 1920’s as a part of vacuum tube development.
The concept is currently used as a compact, non nuclear reactor source of fast neutrons.
The technology is close to a century old, and has been researched by some of the best engineers and scientists in American history, yet nobody has really expanded on all of that research since the 1960’s, outside of a few researchers.
Put it this way, with equipment that I can scavenge and assemble in my garage, I can produce a contained fusion reaction that can acheive a 10^14 neutron output for less than 1KW input power.
The trick is energy gain, and direct conversion from reaction to electrical output. Anything less is just a waste. You would need a net energy gain of 200 (input/output) to be economically feasile. And, once the reaction is started, the system needs to be self sustaining, meaning 200 energy gain PLUS energy required for balance of plant operation.
15
posted on
11/03/2015 10:19:36 AM PST
by
factoryrat
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
16
posted on
11/03/2015 10:19:37 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
To: MUDDOG
What the saucers run on sure isn’t going to turn out to be fossil fuel, so we have discoveries yet to be made, fer shur.
17
posted on
11/03/2015 10:22:19 AM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
To: Borges
Thanks to this advance, practical fusion energy is probably just 10 to 15 years away . . . which is the same delay time we’ve assumed for several decades now.
18
posted on
11/03/2015 10:30:44 AM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: DoughtyOne
19
posted on
11/03/2015 10:32:23 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
To: Red Badger
No ofense intended. Just showing an html method to match up different sized photos.
< img src=”xxxxxx.jpg” height=350 >
20
posted on
11/03/2015 10:34:48 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson