Posted on 11/02/2015 5:53:03 PM PST by amorphous
Bomb? Onboard fire?
I will patiently await the investigation results because it is fruitless to speculate, but I am confused about one thing - did’nt the pilot radio in right before the crash about technical difficulties?
Unless they consulted ClockBoy.
ML/NJ
I am convinced that hillary/obama supplied anti aircraft missiles to Al Qaeda affiliates to deny the skies to Qaddafi because the French would not allow a no”fly zone” in the crappy UN. . After they killed him they tried and failed to BUY THEM BACK in Benghazi with 31 cia weapons experts on the ground to transport them in C130s that flew in with Stevens for the “BUY”!!. When it blew up,they panicked with the LIE that is now so well known.
I now believe that one of hillary’s missiles was use on the innocents 31,000 feet over the Sinai!! “Oh what tangled webs we weave”!!
My question also. Not too many facts to put into a timeline.
did not the pilot radio in right before the crash about technical difficulties?
Could it be that he was having trouble getting the plane to Mach 2 in order to outrun the missile?
No. That was false reporting.
“but I am confused about one thing - did’nt the pilot radio in right before the crash about technical difficulties?:
No. That report turned out to be false. Nothing from the plane indicating trouble. Flying one instant and disintegrating and falling to the ground the next.
Maybe my tinfoil is not tight enough, or perhaps too tight.
I do not believe much if anything from a ‘government spokesman’.
Those pesky center fuel tanks again.
Maybe it was the center fuel tank exploding.
If it was a missile, it was given to them by Obama.
The video I watched, if valid, appeared to be a chase plane within less than a mile.
Remote detonation seems plausible...
...unless they used an Ahmed clock to coordinate their video in chase of the detonation.../s
Thanks. Another example of why you can’t trust early reporting on incidents like this one.
A bomb is certainly a possibility and any hull rupture at that altitude and speed would certainly cause the plane to break up.
Sad for the loss of life and hope they get to the bottom of it.
Apparently this never happened. As usual there are a lot of rumors and errors in statements made too soon after an air disaster.
Sounds like an on-board bomb to me.The Russian part is just too coincidental.
My first impression was bomb loaded onto plane by Islamic ground crew.
You can be certain that forensic examination of the wreckage and a thorough review of the flight voice and data recorders will reveal the cause of the crash.
Also, contrary to the often slanderous comments made about covering up the causes of air disasters, the Russians do in fact have a pretty good track record for following the evidence - the Ukrainian MH shoot-down being the one huge example to the contrary.
This case does not have the geopolitical aspects of the MH disaster, however. I think we can be very confident that we will learn what happened. I think it may turn out to be a bojinka type exploit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.