To: Enlightened1
Sounds like someone is throwing a temper tantrum because Apple won’t give them unfettered access to customer’s data.
To: Enlightened1
The DOJ should use 0bama’s back door.
3 posted on
10/26/2015 6:19:32 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
To: Enlightened1
The DOJ needs to shut its felonious piehole.
7 posted on
10/26/2015 6:36:40 PM PDT by
kiryandil
(Maya: "Liberalism Is What Smart Looks Like to Stupid People")
To: Enlightened1
Drip, drip, drip... bit by bit we lose our freedom and constitutional rights as the bureaucrats in government demand to know every aspect of our lives. How far our nation has fallen since the beginning. We are becoming serfs under an evil empire that does not respect our privacy.
9 posted on
10/26/2015 6:37:46 PM PDT by
roadcat
To: Enlightened1
Remember back when our government kept it quiet that they were spying on everyone ?
12 posted on
10/26/2015 6:41:04 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: Enlightened1
Can’t believe Obama-nation’s admin is going after another homosexual.
13 posted on
10/26/2015 6:41:14 PM PDT by
NetAddicted
(Just looking)
To: Swordmaker; Enlightened1
Hey Swordmaker,
Rehash of an earlier thread topic, figured you might want to ping your list anyway.
-- Dayglored
17 posted on
10/26/2015 6:49:47 PM PDT by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: Enlightened1
That demand is as absurd as trying to compel Phil Zimmermann to decrypt someone’s PGP encrypted data.
To: Enlightened1
“we’ve used these orders before to force Apple to unlock phones. Why should this one be any different?”
Because forcing people to do things against their will and rights motivates them to find a solution. In this case, make it impossible to comply.
20 posted on
10/26/2015 7:36:36 PM PDT by
ctdonath2
(Everyone entering NRA offices come out alive. Not so Planned Parenthood.)
To: Enlightened1
More reasons for:
1. Any purchasers outside of the US (never mind inside of the US) would be out of their minds to buy US-made equipment.
2. If any high-tech companies are still actually legally headquartered in the US and/or do development here, they should leave, immediately, for Europe or Asia.
Wasn’t it not too long ago when we were accusing the Chinese of putting in “secret functionality” in chips and code (which I don’t believe has ever been proven)? Some nerve.
23 posted on
10/26/2015 8:02:38 PM PDT by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
To: Enlightened1
All of fedgov - ALL OF IT - needs complete dismantling and restructuring on a much much smaller and constitutionally-limited foundation.
Would help also to bar most of the current employees from ever holding positions in the rebuilt one, as most have develped bad habits we do not want resurfacing again.
24 posted on
10/26/2015 8:26:07 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Enlightened1
So XYZ Safe and Vault should give the government the combination to every safe they manufacture because XYZ Safe and Vault holds the patent on their combination lock????
I don't think so.
To: Enlightened1
So you rent a house and therefore have no rights under the Constitution?
26 posted on
10/26/2015 10:30:18 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: Enlightened1
The filing also challenges Apple's assertions about the burdensomeness of the request. The government says Apple makes $100 million per day in profit. How can the unlocking of one phone -- no matter how many man hours might go towards testimony and cross-examination -- even begin to make a dent in this pile of money?DOJ obviously missing the Constitutional point - expecting free stuff from a company in order to do their dirty business.
Apple ought to tell them that since a day's wage came up, perhaps a bill for $100 million per device unlocked should be considered....
27 posted on
10/27/2015 4:24:22 AM PDT by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: Enlightened1; dayglored; ShadowAce; ThunderSleeps; ~Kim4VRWC's~; 1234; Abundy; Action-America; ...
Another article on the DOJ arguing that Apple should be forced to unlock iOS devices, claiming that the reason is that Apple owns the operating system, not the customer, who only licenses it. While that is true, that's akin to saying because the Leasing owns the your leased Car, that company should have the power to open your trunk and let the cops search it, and then open the locked briefcase they find in the trunk, merely because they are the owners of the vehicle lease. Apple may own the operating system, they do not own the data that is on the iOS device, or the iPhone on which it exists. PING! Ping to dayglored, Shadow Ace, and ThunderSleeps for their lists also, as this issue spills over into all devices.
![](http://i62.tinypic.com/6gfvon.jpg)
Apple Customer Privacy
Ping!
The Latest Apple/Mac/iOS Pings can be found by searching Keyword ApplePingList on Freerepublics Search.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
28 posted on
10/27/2015 11:27:53 AM PDT by
Swordmaker
( This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue...)
To: Enlightened1
iOS is apple’s. The hardware is mine, and the data it contains is most definitely mine.
To: Enlightened1
If Apple owns it, its theirs. The government has no right to it.
31 posted on
10/27/2015 5:31:46 PM PDT by
Delta 21
(Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson