Posted on 10/25/2015 5:45:01 AM PDT by Kaslin
After watching Hillarys Oscar winning performance last Thursday before The House Select Committee On Benghazi, Im now completely convinced that Hillary could stand naked on the smoldering carcass of Chris Stevens while smoking a fat Bob Marley-sized joint, as she screamed aloud the contents of Mein Kampf, and the Left would hail her a Warrior Poet. Shes the new Lizard King she can do anything.
Matter of fact, if I were Satan, Id start sweating my crimson butt off because The Hildebeest made the Serpent of Old look like a clunky, overly honest used-car salesmen. Our Faust is female, yall.
Not one person and not one question rattled Hillary. As in no one. As in nada, nothing, zilch, zero, zippo got under her wrinkled, Bill-averse flesh. Bow and kiss the ring, peeps, and meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Hillarys flawless and skillful execution wasn't because she was telling the truth -- because she wasnt. She knew she was peddling lies and everyone and their iguana knew that she was stretching the truth through her Frito Pie-hole. But it didnt/doesnt matter because she did it with such amazing precision. And thats all that matters in our unfortunate day; namely, an adept ability to con abecedarian Americans.
The only weird moment Hillary had came via that coughing fit, which was completely understandable because one can only spout so much bullcrap until it triggers mucus to drain down the back of one's throat, causing one to cough.
Yep, folks, I obviously thought she was good and that she took blowing bollocks to an Olympic level that Obama could only dream of. In comparison to and in contrast with Obamas attempts at regaling us with his gobbledygook, please note that she didnt have all the uhs and and ums that accompany the president when hes slinging hash. It was deception perfection on steroids, ladies and gents.
That said, I predict salesmen, shady evangelists, journalists, members of Congress, psychopaths, mean girls and Facebook stalkers, in days to come, will study her subtleties because what she wielded was some world-class wiles.
For stage purposes, Hillary looked completely presidential during her Benghazi cross. Completely comfortable. Nearly too comfortable.
I dont believe any of the GOPers couldve even come close to doing what Hillary did in deceiving The United States of Duh. Especially, Marco Rubio. Rubio wouldve never been able to pull off that sleight-of-hand. Marco sweats when he tells the truth. He perspires more that a 15-year-old boy at a Beyoncé concert. He's a rookie. Hillary's a pro.
And thats what our presidency has come down to, folks; namely, the ability to adeptly deceive, blame-shift and bamboozle a daft, distracted and dilatory electorate. And if one has, like Hillary has, a demonic ability to spin, coupled with an adoring media thatll run interference for you, then boom! Youre our next president.
Finally, and hopefully, God willing, I'm wrong. But if you under-estimate this old chick and the nefarious forces behind her, then you do it to our nation's detriment.
I hope I'm wrong but agree with the author. I have said myself if she ever gets the nomination she would win because the only way the dems would allow her the nomination would be if the election were fixed to the extent that she could not lose.
I believe this is exactly what happened with Obamas second term. It is still believed even by conservatives that four to five million republicans stayed home and sat out the election. Yet there is no valid proof that this happened and stacks of evidence that show Republicans in fact showed out in record numbers.
I witnessed this first hand myself. I have been voting since Reagan and never stood in line more than five to ten minutes yet for Obamas second term I stood in line nearly TWO HOURS. This was true at polling places all over the country yet somehow Obama won.
You see the dems have figured out they don't need trunk loads of pre marked ballots when we have electronic voting machines. Simply load software that cancels and or changes votes for Republicans to Democrats. I believe this is the explanation for so many small precincts going 100 percent Obama. The software loaded was not sophisticated enough to compensate for very small voter blocks and wiped out all the Republic votes.
So yes I think she will win because she can't lose.
Electronic Voting machines as made today are spelling the end of any legitimacy of our elections.
“Faust made a deal with the devil, but was not the devil himself.”
I believe you’ve hit on something. Hillary must have long ago made her pact with Satan, which is the only logical explanation for her reptilian survivability.
Nothing touches Hillary, nothing sticks to Hillary; she goes where she pleases and strikes where she pleases.
And Vince Foster is still dead.
Bill Clinton was the President. Removing a sitting President from office could be traumatic.
Hillary Clinton has lots of paid helpers in the media, but putting her behind bars is only traumatic to her.”
That's what's been forgotten when people state, “Obama should have lost in 2012 but the people re reelected him.
Let's revisit that time.
Romney was a poor candidate who couldn't excite the base.
BHO actually lost votes from 2008. Just those lost votes didn't go to Romney.
A sitting president is very hard to remove. Even as bad as things were in the late 1970’s Reagan had to work very hard to convince people to remove Carter and even the polling didn't favor him till near the end.
Speaking of polling, one unexscapable fact remains. The public finds her dishonest. If the electorate decides you're a liar and everything you say is a lie, that is impossible to shake. Trust in the news is at an all time low. Lopsided right/wrong direction. The economy remains soft and alot of the ObamaCare difficulties that were hidden in 2012 are coming to pass now. A majority sees government corruption as the biggest problem facing the country. Whereas Bill was popular amongst the general electorate and had a big likability factor to get him out of messes, she doesn't.
She can win. But it isn't a foregone conclusion
Giles is simply writing about the Faustian deal with THE Devil Hillary has made - and the Spirit of Delusion and blindness that everyone seems to have around her.
Her mentor is Satan himself - the Father of Lies. He’s not exactly throwing up his hands - he’s for Trump or Cruz - the ONLY ones who can stop The Beast.
I don’t think Trump intends to lie down and take it like Romney did. He plays to win and I’m sure he has a plan to combat fraud.
I tptally agree that what we saw after the hearing was all a show by both the left wing media and of course Hillary. I think that the revelation of her email to her daughter that she knew it was terrorists will come back to haunt her and she knows it. Catherine Herridge said that you could see Hillary visibly slump when that came out. Other than that she kept up a good front. And, how happy are Obama, VJ, Susan Rice that this info came out? Hillary brought this on all of them.
Linda Tripp, who practically sat next to Hillary in the Clinton WH, came out recently and reiterated that H should not ever be POTUS and that what we see is nothing but show.
I do believe the only one who can break through this is Trump. But also, Hillary still is very unlikable no matter how hard she tries and lies.
“”Fact is, there is a good segment of society that will vote for her no matter what.””
Anyone who thinks otherwise didn’t watch the debate in Las Vegas and see the outpouring of support at every word, twitch, move, giggle, head nod that woman made....Truly disgusting and sickening.
She also had her supporters in the hearing room on Capitol Hill on Thursday and 5 of them on the committee not even pretending they were unbiased.
If Trump debates hillary, the ratings will be through the roof of the ADNOC headquarters in Dubai. That is when he should tell the public exactly how she lied about Benghazi.
I bet she was on some powerful meds and gallons of Botox.
She probably laughed through all the released videos. I can even see her celebrating like she did after the hearing.
Simple.
The tokenism of a black President exceeded the tokenism of a woman President, especially when that woman was Hillary.
Now, it's "been there, done that, got the T-shirt". The next "milestone" is a woman in the Oval Office. And there are millions of people that will vote for Hillary for no other reason than "it's a woman's turn".
I think the technology is there that she had a minute or implanted earpiece and gets fed response info
That question was answered by Joe Biden last week.
When you allow any idiot over eighteen to vote even if said idiot is totally dependent on the actions of others to keep said idiot alive you should not expect wise decisions. Our wise founders left us a republic and we have turned it into a defacto democracy with the expected result. Cater to the weakest of voters and you will inevitably produce not only a weak nation but a failed nation.
I actually think this is our best chance in quite some time. A little like after the Carter years. A good number of disaffected (and often low-info) voters, AKA Reagan Democrat types, are ripe for the pickin’s—and Trump is a great candidate for them.
People don’t want another Bush or Clinton either, and with Hillary now lined up for the Democrat nomination, the GOP could benefit. The biggest risk I see is a GOPe that would rather keep Trump out of office than win with Trump.
No doubt.
That is exactly what the conventional wisdom and Dick Morris are saying. But consider this:
Obama holds Hillary's fate in his hands in any number of ways; Indict or not indict, Special prosecutor or no special prosecutor. He knows what he is going to do, and Joe Biden probably does as well. We all know the Obamas hate the Clintons and the feeling is mutual between them.
If at some point in time (Nov./Dec.) Obama is going to give the go ahead to go after Hillary (through the DOJ), why would Biden enter the race now?
The smarter move would be to not go against Hillary and create a divisiveness in the ranks but to wait. When Hillary withdraws, Jumpin' Joe could step in to play the role of a unit-er.
Excellent reply
Oh, okay
I am aware that the American Press is being paid to protect Hillary.
The American Press is not the FBI.
You have to examine the thinking of the American Press.
They cover for Hillary because they think that there are only benefits for them to do so.
They are getting paid to do it.
They are covering up for someone who they think has the same ideology as them.
What’s the worst that could happen to them (the American Press)? They lose a few readers?
Intentionally misleading the American public to coverup espionage committed by Hillary and Obama is aiding and abetting espionage against the United States.
This isn’t some crosstown high school football game with the Press just supporting their team. This isn’t just getting paid by the Democrats.
This is the real deal.
Life or death.
Men screaming in agony.
Little girls lying on their bed crying for a week because Daddy isn’t coming home.
It doesn’t get any more serious than this.
I believe that more and more Americans are starting to understand this.
Don't forget the ignorant or idiot, err I mean uninformed voters
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.