Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

I’d rather see Cruz on the SCOTUS. He’d do a lot more good for a lot longer.


5 posted on 10/23/2015 8:15:41 AM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Exsurge, Domine, et judica causam tuam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Or, as advisor to someone like Trump.


8 posted on 10/23/2015 8:17:22 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

I’d rather see him as president or vice. You would have to wait, probably until hell freezes over, for a liberal seat to open on the SC. In addition, if he is on the court and there is not a clear conservative majority then again he will accomplish little. We have a couple of justices right now who are constitutionalists but they usually end up as dissenting opinions. We need him in a position of power immediately, where he can make an immediate difference. Could he be appointed later when the conditions are right, even while VP? Of course.


15 posted on 10/23/2015 8:23:18 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd
I’d rather see Cruz on the SCOTUS. He’d do a lot more good for a lot longer.

Elect him now for eight years and then follow Taft's example and serve as Chief Justice.

25 posted on 10/23/2015 8:32:12 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (The 1st amendment is the voice and the 2nd is the teeth of freedom. Obama wants to knock out both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Seriously? There would need to be 100 GOP senators for Cruz to have a chance at confirmation. And even then he would probably lose. They know he’s the real deal.


40 posted on 10/23/2015 8:50:15 AM PDT by alstewartfan (Even when I cannot see him I can feel it in my bones That he's still there. Trespasser by Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

I’d rather see him be president first and pick a few SCOTUS. No one would be able to pick real conservatives like him.


47 posted on 10/23/2015 8:56:19 AM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

You are probably right, but imagine how the Left would howl over a Cruz SCOTUS nomination. Instead of a SCOTUS nominee being “Borked”, we would probably have to come up with a whole new word!!!!


59 posted on 10/23/2015 9:10:35 AM PDT by RatRipper (The biggest threat to US national security is our government and those in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

There is nothing preventing the appointment of a former president to the Supreme Court. Which would do good for the country even longer.


61 posted on 10/23/2015 9:11:32 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Newly fledged NRA Life Member (after many years as an "annual renewal" sort))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

I’d rather see Cruz on the SCOTUS. >>


Nope, he is too young to be shoved off as one vote on the SC, deep in the caverns of the Supreme Court building.

He is a political evangelist with energy and needs to be returned to the Senate where he can expound against corruption and totalitarianism.

Who else’s voice in the crap senate do we have, but his? Otherwise, we roll over without even a whimper.


67 posted on 10/23/2015 9:19:56 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Yes he would!


80 posted on 10/23/2015 9:41:13 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

or make the next court appointments as CIC........


108 posted on 10/23/2015 10:17:39 AM PDT by MomMcGraff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Agree to a point - he’ll help a little over 10%. We need more than 50% of the Supreme Court to do what they take the oath to do.

Because we can’t reasonably expect that, given the current culture, we also need to introduce periodic approvals of justices by the people to prevent them from *legislating*... as Ted has said.


123 posted on 10/23/2015 11:34:14 AM PDT by plsjr (<>< Mankind "knows" by trial and error; Only the CREATOR really knows His creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson