Posted on 10/20/2015 6:13:47 PM PDT by mbj
“Judicial Watch has confirmed the existence of draft indictments of Hillary Clinton for her lies and obstruction in the Whitewater bank-fraud investigation,” the group’s president Tom Fitton wrote in the statement.
“The Obama administration is refusing to release these records out of concern for Hillary Clinton’s privacy. Hillary Clinton’s privacy cannot be allowed to trump the public’s interest in knowing more about whether she obstructed justice and lied to a federal grand jury.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Obama thinks the public needs to know...
...next to nothing about him.
This about Hillary.
Our media should be shamed out of the nation.
Not quite accurate. The lies and unethical behavior, yes. Getting kicked off the committee, no.
Hitlery was not fired. The Judiciary Committee's impeachment inquiry staff was disbanded Nixon's resignation rendered it moot.
Cordially
Thanks. I’m just trying to point out her long list of negatives which SHOULD render her UNFIT for office.
If she ever needs another one that gets real results, Liberty Counsel is excellent.
Hasn’t Whitewater gone beyond its “use by” date?
Its time to Move On, dontcha know.
Past practices.
Obama used it to hide his BC and college records and has used it to cover the behinds of many of his comrades.
I shudda read further. We had the same thoughts, you beat me to it.
More importantly, who’s side is obummer on? crazy joe or hitlery?
Isn’t there a 5 year Statute of Limitations on non-capital crimes?
No surprise. The MSM sucks as does the RINO media.
“Hasn’t Whitewater gone beyond its “use by” date?
Its time to Move On, dontcha know.”
Have you ever heard “pattern of behavior” used in criminal trials?
That GIF is a little crude for Free Republic I think.
STRUGGLING TAX-PAYING AMERICANS NEED TO GO THIS ROUTE to nail govt officials like Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Loretta Lynch labeling Americans terrorists, Lois Lerner, John Koskinen, targeting conservatives, criminal members of Congress, and other govt-paid factotums, using public monies to rewrite laws arbitrarily for their own self-serving political agendas and other criminal purposes.
BACKSTORY The 1980 Georgia General Assembly was concerned about “the increasing sophistication of various criminal elements on the public payroll”. The GA Assembly then adopted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), patterned after a similar federal law.
(RICO is routinely used to try to prove that a legal business was being used for illegal means, and, in at its inception, RICO was used to prosecute drug traffickers or organized crime members).
In recent years prosecutors have applied RICO to crooked government officials: (1) those accused of using their public offices for personal gain, and, (2) officials of govt agencies using public monies to flout the law.
To bring a case under Georgia’s RICO law, there must be at least two underlying felonies — such as fraud, bribery, witness tampering (among other felonies).
RICO allows prosecutors to include multiple defendants charged with various crimes in the blanket indictment, and to charge that govt employees, publicy-funded and publicly-sanctioned entities were allegedly part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
EXAMPLE A govt official commits two felonies by (1) accepting, and, (2) filing falsified documents.
NOTE GA's RICO law recently put 26 corrupt teachers in jail for taking bribes (bonuses) to falsify official documents. And if proof is established that RICO'ed criminal public officials impaired the commercial and economic viability of the region, that could also be prosecutable under the Hobbs Act.
Not quite accurate. The lies and unethical behavior, yes. Getting kicked off the committee, no.
Hitlery was not fired. The Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry staff was disbanded Nixon’s resignation rendered it moot. “””
Everything I remember says that Hillary was removed from the legal counsel group due to her lies & bias & manipulating evidence. BEFORE the disbanding of the committee.
That’s pretty funny! :-)
I donated after seeing that article, too. :-)
Please don’t forget the Freepathon...
Maybe so.
But I think the public still has a right to know, whether she is prosecuted or not. Her running for office puts things in a different perspective, to some extent - and just because she’s not prosecuted for a crime does not mean that the public shouldn’t know about her past decisions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.