Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary server had remote-control gateways wide open
Hot Air ^ | October 13, 2015 | Ed Morrisey

Posted on 10/13/2015 8:50:51 AM PDT by lbryce

The only item missing from the secret e-mail server run by Hillary Clinton appears to be the welcome mat for hackers. According to the Associated Press, the Clintons set up remote-control operations of its server without ever bothering to build in the normal security that would accompany those functions in a professional setting — if one could even find a professional setting that would allow those functions to operate at all:

Clinton’s server, which handled her personal and State Department correspondence, appeared to allow users to connect openly over the Internet to control it remotely, according to detailed records compiled in 2012. Experts said the Microsoft remote desktop service wasn’t intended for such use without additional protective measures, and was the subject of U.S. government and industry warnings at the time over attacks from even low-skilled intruders. Just in case any hackers missed the “Open House” sign on the unlocked front door, the Clintons left two back doors unlocked, too:

Records show that Clinton additionally operated two more devices on her home network in Chappaqua, New York, that also were directly accessible from the Internet. One contained similar remote-control software that also has suffered from security vulnerabilities, known as Virtual Network Computing, and the other appeared to be configured to run websites.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: backdoor; bckdooraction; clinton; emailgate; hillaryclinton; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemailserver; hillarysbackdoor; remotecontrol; sloppyandopen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: PLMerite

Perhaps more along the lines of when your priorities are evading the law, you can’t really go to top-line firms. They would laugh in your face and report you to the FBI.

************************************************

Even a Platte River employee recognized “shaddy (sp) sh!t” when they saw it. They didn’t go to the FBI, but the email has since been exposed .... just shows that they knew reducing the backups & deleting info was wrong. It’s obstruction of justice at best .... but it only matters if DOJ charges her with it. Of course, she was using “Clinton Executive Services” for all her contracts .... another layer of ‘insulation’ for the Queen of Corruption & Slick Willy.


21 posted on 10/13/2015 9:12:57 AM PDT by Qiviut (Stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of the cross; lift high his royal banner, it must not loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pietro
"one of the reasons that her IT knowledge was so horribly inept is that she only listens to women"

I sure would not want to be you if that comment gets noticed by the Freeper ladies here. But I think you are on to something

22 posted on 10/13/2015 9:13:26 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

What difference does it make now?

She already gave away all our national secrets....

The last two ... scratch that three... Democrat administrations have been a bonanza for our enemies.


23 posted on 10/13/2015 9:14:16 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Restore Liberty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

This would explain a whole lot of things.
The Russians, Chinese and other countries intel people have the goods on Obozo and Hillarious. They have ALL the emails and will hold them as a Sword of Damocles above their heads for the foreseeable future. They want Hillary to win POTUS so they can blackmail her for 8 years...................................


24 posted on 10/13/2015 9:16:28 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Breasts or other parts?

If both, then CNN.


25 posted on 10/13/2015 9:17:33 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Restore Liberty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

At this point, I think it would be hard to blackmail her.

Maybe videos with her and Huma, but even that is being forced to be acceptable.

btw, I think the huge push the last few years to make it acceptable is that Barry is being blackmailed. Videos? Pictures?

He is at the mercy of the homomafi.


26 posted on 10/13/2015 9:20:07 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (Restore Liberty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

27 posted on 10/13/2015 9:28:57 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; All

Everyone who thinks that this will be brought up in the debate tonight, raise your hand. Didn’t think so


28 posted on 10/13/2015 9:29:54 AM PDT by Din Maker (GOP Gov. Susana Martinez of NM for VP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This was done on PURPOSE!! The foreign countries give the Clinton Crime Family SLUSH FUND MILLIONS, she openly gives them favors from the State Dept PLUS she probably e-mailed them a THANK YOU note with her NON GOV email address quite clear!

It's called PLAUSIBLE DENIALIBILITY!!!

29 posted on 10/13/2015 9:29:55 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Hillary server had remote-control gateways wide open

I seriously doubt Hillary has ever had her gateways wide open. And that's probably a good thing.

30 posted on 10/13/2015 9:30:42 AM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

BINGO!!! It was MEANT to be sloppy and OPEN!!


31 posted on 10/13/2015 9:31:00 AM PDT by Ann Archy (ABORTION....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pietro

Obviously, you’ve never met Chloe O’Brian. ;)


32 posted on 10/13/2015 9:32:26 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Why hasn’t she been stuffed into the backseat of a squad car yet? Oh I know, but still.


33 posted on 10/13/2015 9:32:26 AM PDT by rdl6989
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
At this point, I think it would be hard to blackmail her.

Not if the issues are of international import, say double dealing with our enemies or corruption in office for monetary gain. Personal faux pas in today's world are not worth the effort........................

34 posted on 10/13/2015 9:35:00 AM PDT by Red Badger (READ MY LIPS: NO MORE BUSHES!...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
I am a smart guy. But I was never called the Smartest Lawyer in the US. The people doing this must really be naive idiots. (Calling Captain Obvious.)

You're smart, but you're not evil enough to really see what is obvious. The people who did this are not naive - they meant to do it this way precisely BECAUSE it WOULD be hacked. Clearly, that was Hillary's goal, her "workaround" to espionage laws. Just make it all available to enemy hacking, and let our enemies do their thing.

It's the SIZE of it all that nobody can grasp. She didn't sell this bit of info or that piece of a secret - she GAVE it ALL away - ALL our secrets, from level of a cabinet position.

It is, by far, the largest and most devastating security breach in American history, and not by accident - it was MEANT to be EXACTLY that.

35 posted on 10/13/2015 9:47:30 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

More proof that Hillary is incompetent and dishonest.


36 posted on 10/13/2015 9:53:34 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

SOURCE: Politico story: "A Cancer on the Clinton Candidacy)

MORE AT http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-2016-emails-213241

37 posted on 10/13/2015 9:53:51 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Most transparent and open administration in history.


38 posted on 10/13/2015 9:55:06 AM PDT by frithguild (The warmth and goodness of Gaia is a nuclear reactor in the Earth's core that burns Thorium)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

When Hillary got the job she was supposedly “trained” in the ins and outs of protecting classified ntl security data.

AS FREEPER SERKIT POSTED: Attention investigators:

<><> Who transported Hillary’s server from NY to NJ? Did the Secret Service (who Hillary insists had been guarding it since it was really Bill’s Library/Foundation asset) accompany and supervise the transport of the server?

<><> Per the interview with Platte River Networks, did they just take it, lock it up, not power it up, connect it to the internet, or not have it functioning as an active email server?

<><> Was there continuity of server activity between May 2013 to August 2015, or did the server go off-line starting in June 2013?

<><> Who received actual server in NJ - the name of the Platte River Networks employee/technician? What WAS it - make/model/form factor, etc.?

<><> Did the Clinton Foundation (or issuer of the RFP on Hillary’s behalf) indicate that the company that would provide data services qualified to handle national-security-level data?

<><> In various interviews and reports, Platte River Networks repeatedly stated they were to “upgrade, manage, and secure” the server. What - specifically - does that mean?

<><> What did Hillary’s RFP/contract order the data center to do specifically?

<><> Does Platte River Networks have sufficient security clearance to handle this type of contract?

<><> What were the firewall protocols in place at the time?

<><> Who - by name - had access to the server, and the administrative authorization to wipe and cleanse the server? When was that done?

<><> Does “upgrade, manage, and secure” the server mean that they PRN was given the task to remove all data from the server when it received it in June 2013?

<><> Was malware or antivirus also on the server?

<><> Was the inherent firewall, virus protection, or operating system “upgraded, managed, and secured”?

<><> Any incidents reported such as DOS attack, hacking, etc.? What were they? How were they resolved?

<><> Other than arranging for the server to be moved from NY to NJ, what was the Denver company contracted to do in relation to maintaining the server?

<><> What tangible evidence is there that the server arrived in functioning condition, was being used as an email server, was “upgraded, managed, and secured”, then wiped just prior to seizure by the FBI?

<><> Were normal and regular backup procedures executed on the server, and where would the back ups be kept?

<><> If no backups were taken, was there a disaster recovery location?

<><> Where was that? If no backups and no disaster recovery, what was the plan if the equipment failed or found to have been wiped of any functionality?

<><> Were any foreign nationals employed at Platte River Networks, or at Datto, that had access to the Clinton server?


39 posted on 10/13/2015 9:56:28 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut
Even a Platte River employee recognized “shaddy (sp) sh!t” when they saw it. They didn’t go to the FBI, but the email has since been exposed .... just shows that they knew reducing the backups & deleting info was wrong. It’s obstruction of justice at best .... but it only matters if DOJ charges her with it.

Of course, she was using “Clinton Executive Services” for all her contracts .... another layer of ‘insulation’ for the Queen of Corruption & Slick Willy.

Insightful...

40 posted on 10/13/2015 11:20:03 AM PDT by GOPJ (Democrats want gun legislation? Fine. Pass a Bill outlawing 'gun free' zones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson