Global Warming on Free Republic here, here and here
Posted on 10/12/2015 3:31:51 PM PDT by RightGeek
Lesson for today:
1. The % of CO2 In the atmosphere due to man is just 0.0037% of the atmosphere
2. 0.0037% of the atmosphere can not possibly capture enough escaping heat, and back radiate a fraction of it to warm the earth- it’s impossible
3. Temperatures always rise first, then hundreds of years later CO2 amounts rise. IF CO2 ‘causes climate change’ How come it doesn’t rise until AFTER temperatures rise?
4. There has been no rise in temperatures in 2 decades, DESPITE the fact that CO2 has steadily risen. IF CO2 ‘causes global warming” How come temperatures haven’t risen?
Study Question: How can just 0.0037% of our atmosphere possibly capture and back radiate a fraction of that heat to cause global climate change?
Study Question 2: How come CO2 only rises AFTERR temperatures rise IF Co2 causes global warming?
So now politicians and judges are in charge of deciding scientific fact!
Sic semper tyrannis...
Point one us incorrect! That is the current CO2 level in the atm.
The amount due to man is s much smaller amount.
The way I figure it, ad I’m no math wizard, so I’m probably wrong, is 3.4% of 0.04% = 0.0037%
The TOTAL amount of CO2 in atmosphere is 0.04%- Man’s contribution is just 3.4% of that 0.04%, which equals 0.0037%
Yes, but only if they don white wigs, and clear their throats a lot
Global Warming on Free Republic here, here and here
[[Point one us incorrect!]]
Every article I’ve seen states that the current amount, the TOTAL amount of CO2 in atmosphere is 0.04%
supposedly the total amount of CO2 is reaching 400 ppm- the atmosphere weighs 6 quadrillion tons, there is a certain tonnage of CO2 I nthe atmosphere- which I believe works out to 0.04%- No?
This kind of thinking by liberals is medieval in nature. Spanish inquisition material. If you don't believe what we tell you to believe, then we will throw you in prison, or worse, execute you for questioning or "denying" our scam. Talk about desperate.
This approach will help them pick up a whole lot of new supporters, I'm sure. And I am sure that the earth will speed up its healing from all the carbon that humans are spewing into the atmosphere. This approach will help a lot. /sarcasm alert/
Heck, all you need to understand that is to fly out West (California) during the day and have a window seat. There’s a whole lot of nothing in large parts of Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada and Utah, just to pick some states.
**** “Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?” *****
Just for this thread but I am sure it would work on others as well... They could offer the Black Robed specks violently removed still beating hearts up as Sacrifice to the Sun?
(ya have to go to the beginning of the thread to fully appreciate just how perfect this plan is)
I believe the earth is millions of years old.
I believe the earth has had hundreds or thousands of cycles of climate change.
I believe climate change has happened repeatedly in the past. It will happen in the future. It could be happening now.
I believe mankind did not start climate change and mankind cannot stop it.
There. I’m a climate change denier. Go ahead and slap the cuffs on me.
Study Question 2: As the sun increases Earth’s temperature, due to fluctuations in its fusion energy, melting ice releases methane and CO2.
Or, “And yet, CO2 sinks.”
Excellent! May I print this? I want to share it at work.
[[And why does the progressive Left think that judges legislate laws?]]
Because they do now, thanks to a spineless GOP who didn’t raise a royal stink and sue to overturn EVERY law legislated from the bench! Or to defund said illegal laws, or to band together and ignore those laws I ntheir states, threatening to arrest ANYONE from the government who came in and tried to enforce such illegal laws
Abcily, My figures may be a bit off- (But I’m very close to what it should be I believe) I think my figures are off a bit because I would hav e to subtract the 3.4% fro m the 0.04% before I figure out what % man is responsible for by multiplying 3.4% by whatever the new total amount of CO2 In atmosphere would be (probably around 0.03 or so)
I don’t mind you using these figures though as the figures of 3.4% and 0.04% are well established figures-
The problem is that people just see the 3.4% that man produces nd think that man has caused 3.4% of the atmosphere to have CO2 in it, and think CO2 is just accumulating to ‘dangerous levels’ (not that 3.4% would be dangerous, but they think it is because of what they are beign taught)- but they forget that the 3.4% is 3.4% of 0.04% and that = 0.0037%
[[Study Question 2: As the sun increases Earth’s temperature, due to fluctuations in its fusion energy, melting ice releases methane and CO2.]]
True, but this takes nearly 1000 years according to the ice core samples that show temps rise first, then 1000 or so years later CO2 rises
Judges and colleges, you never know what they’re going to say or do next.
Totalitarians default to violence when they can’t get their way by lying. Guess we’ve moved to ‘stage 2’...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.