Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I wanted to see what Russian press was saying about the Syria operation. I linked to the google translation of an article today in Argumenty i Fakty (Arguments and Facts), one of the more widely read Russian papers. I was not surprised how they reported on the Syrian operation (going well), but it was interesting how openly dismissive and negative it is about the US, and basically says the Cold War is back on. This is a link to the original article in Russian, and above is an excerpt of some comments about the US, bold added for emphasis.

Obama's cluelessness has reignited the Cold War, and it is getting warm.

here is a little more from the article:

You know what the problem is Americans? They do not offer a positive agenda. They say: "We are against Assad. We are against Hussein. We are against Mubarak, and so on. " And for whom do you then? States do not offer a positive solution. Our position is stronger, it is morally justified. With proper positioning of the information it produces sympathy. That's scary for some states. We must conduct counter-propaganda must clarify our position, nothing wrong with that, on the contrary - it reinforces the image of our country: to show who we are, who we are and what we offer. And we propose concrete steps.

In Syria, acts and so-called anti-terrorist coalition led by the United States. Can we expect a revitalization of its actions?

It's already happened: the Americans immediately began to report on the new blow to the IG. But it was not without irony. They reported the destruction of two excavators, one motorcycle. Of course, it looks a little funny. I do not exclude that now from the coalition will begin a serious blow to the "Islamic state", because they have to show that they are also doing something. But it is nice if the militants are constantly subjected to military pressure. From the standpoint of the history of international relations, Syria has now developed a unique situation in one country two forces led military campaign against the same opponent in parallel. This has never happened before. This is the uniqueness of the current "cold war". Of course, in some areas it will be very different from the previous one, will not be such a hard division into two camps. It is no longer bipolar "Cold War" - it is multipolar.


1 posted on 10/05/2015 9:38:30 PM PDT by Wayne07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MrShoop
… but we have a de facto live in a “cold war” with the United States. Not with Europe, and it is with America. …
Molotov-Ribbentrop redux? and if so, what is Europe up to?
2 posted on 10/05/2015 9:43:35 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrShoop

Jogged my memory to some info I need to follow on about Mineral riches in Afghanistan that are amazing...

Would not take much of a concerted effort to gain control, the current residents are not rocket scientists..

Water resources in Libya Far beyond what has been reported, part of the reason Big Q was forced out..

More value than the oil...

And multiple times more...

Lots of intrigues out there


3 posted on 10/05/2015 9:49:52 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrShoop

There are those writing opinion pieces that have no idea that Syria has been in Russia’s orbit for decades. This is, completely, the Russians’ show.


5 posted on 10/05/2015 9:56:36 PM PDT by JennysCool (My hypocrisy goes only so far)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrShoop

ISIS says, “al-Putin Akhbar”. Those who aren’t bombed to dust, that is.


8 posted on 10/05/2015 10:11:17 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Congress will have blood on their hands if anything happens because of the Iran appeasement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrShoop
Then there's this from Pravda.
9 posted on 10/05/2015 10:26:49 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrShoop
Yikes! This one's even better.
12 posted on 10/05/2015 10:31:01 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrShoop
In the ranks of the militants started to panic. An expert on the operation in Syria

I have a serious problem with foreign language commentators reporting in English.

There is serious ambiguity in ever using the word "militants" when referring to physical conflict. It could mean anything from ISIS/ISIL, to the Southern Poverty Law Center, and the New Black Panthers...

13 posted on 10/05/2015 11:09:08 PM PDT by publius911 (Pissed?? You have NO idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MrShoop

Lavrov basically embarrassed and ridiculed John Kerry at the UN last week, making him wait well over an hour to meet, and giving a lengthy presser before a very short meeting with Kerry, that he left ANGRY.

The whole situation made Kerry look like an ass.

AS USUAL, this involves a Democrat, though, and the US Press wouldn’t DARE to even mention it.

(just IMAGINE the coverage had the Russians done this to Condaleesa Rice!) But the rest of the world’s media has.


14 posted on 10/05/2015 11:48:01 PM PDT by tcrlaf (They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson