Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Described as "left to far left" in the Wikipedia article on Israel's newspapers. It's a daily newspaper, English language, with a circulation of about 50,000.

*****

In the spirit of Andrew Brietbart, whose last work was "Vetting Obama" for the 2012 election, after pointing out how poorly he had been vetted in 2008, I am initiating the "Vetting Bernie" project.

There is a increasing likelihood that Bernie will squeeze past the badly damaged Hillary campaign to become the nominee. To date FR has focused little effort on debunking and defining Bernie. It seems patently obvious to most here that anyone self-describing as a "democratic socialist" is clearly disqualified from being POTUS. But, as the Obama election shows, in present day America's degraded state this is sadly not true.

Thus, the importance of deliving into Bernie's past and investigating his bio.

The first area I am interested in is his time after college. We are told that Bernie "applied for" conscientious objector status, and was a "pacifist" at the time of the Vietnam war. We are also told that his application was denied, but that by then "time was up" and he did not have to serve.

Was Bernie's trip to Israel a way to avoid the draft? What dates were Bernie's applications made for CO status, and were deferments granted for his supposed Kibbutz service?

1 posted on 09/30/2015 11:08:28 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black

Story not available to non HAARETZ subscribers.


2 posted on 09/30/2015 11:12:16 AM PDT by golux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Time to kibbitz about his kibbutz?


3 posted on 09/30/2015 11:12:37 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Good question.

Even Haaretz is stumped.

The kibbutz used to exemplify Israeli socialism and produced the elite of Israeli society but it fell on hard times.

Most have had to go the capitalist route to survive.


4 posted on 09/30/2015 11:12:41 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Ugh, paywall.

Everyone in my family who spent time on a kibbutz wound up to be either a socialist loon Obama supporter, or a hardcore capitalist.


5 posted on 09/30/2015 11:13:23 AM PDT by Read Write Repeat (Not one convinced me they want the job yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Hillary had famously lied about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary, until someone noticed that he didn’t achieve his Everest fame until she was about four years old.

Maybe Sanders will claim that his parents were huge Yankees’ fans and so they named little Bernie after Bernie Williams.


6 posted on 09/30/2015 11:20:22 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Today's Civil Rights movement: Black Lives Matter--unless they are cops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
"Most have had to go the capitalist route to survive."

I think that the jewish people have done very well within the capitalist system. The American pilgrims dabbled in communism early on and almost starved to death. They also learned that communism goes against the very fabric of human nature.

8 posted on 09/30/2015 11:21:01 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
Inetersting that a second Israeli writer also set out to find which Kibbutz Bernie Sanders volunteered at, and also was unable to solve the mystery.

My Quixotic Hunt for Bernie Sanders Kibbutz

The name of Sanders’s kibbutz might seem like a minor detail, but it’s important. Among other things, it could build on our understanding of his formative years before he became a populist firebrand filling stadiums across America as Hillary Rodham Clinton’s main challenger in the Democratic primary race. Was it one of the hard-left kibbutzim of that era affiliated with the Marxist political party Mapam? Or was it one of the more moderate socialist communities affiliated with the ruling Mapai party?

Given what we might learn it is not that surprising the Sanders is hiding information on this topic.

One clear goal of the Vetting Bernie project is to raise awareness of the many unanswered questions regarding his past, and move the Overton Window on how Bernie is portrayed in the Media.

He's had a nice long run of "everyone's favorite lefty uncle", without much in the way of actual research being done. This is strikingly similar to the kid-glove treatment that Obama received. It's obviously critical for us to disrupt this narrative, as quickly as possible, and continuing throughout the election cycle.

The American People need and deserve to know the true facts of the personal history of any and all candidates for the office of President. It's quite amazing, for instance, that today, in a comment on an article on an obscure web-site was the first time I have ever seen the topic of Bernie's Vietnam era draft dodging even mentioned. (Compare with the microscopic coverage given to every minute of W's service.)

9 posted on 09/30/2015 11:22:33 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Disarmament of a targeted group is one of the surest early warning signs of future genocide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

I know squat about Bernie Sanders except that he is socialist. Now I see he is a Jew. Has any Jew come into the mainstream candidates for President before? Not that I believe he is a practicing Jew or even respects Judaism.


12 posted on 09/30/2015 11:27:43 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

13 posted on 09/30/2015 11:28:45 AM PDT by South40 (Trump on Kim Davis: I hate to see her being sent to jail but the law is the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
In the spirit of Andrew Brietbart, whose last work was "Vetting Obama" for the 2012 election, ..., I am initiating the "Vetting Bernie" project.

In the demise of Andrew Brietbart, whose last work was vetting a Leftist presidential candidate, I suggest you get substantially more life insurance.

15 posted on 09/30/2015 11:36:17 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Please put me on your ping list. Thanks.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/03/26/exclusive-bernie-sanders-wife-may-have-defrauded-state-agency-bank/

Daily Caller News Foundation

EXCLUSIVE: Bernie Sanders’ Wife May Have Defrauded State Agency, Bank
10:17 PM 03/26/2015

Blake Neff and Peter Fricke

Documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation indicate that the wife of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders may have been able to use her clout to get away with loan fraud, nearly bankrupting the small college she was president of and collecting a sizable severance package in the process.

These revelations come amid growing speculation that Sen. Sanders, a self-described socialist who has blasted the U.S. government asan oligarchy run by billionaires and railed against the golden parachutes received by top corporate executives, will contend for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Jane Sanders was the president of tiny Burlington College in Burlington, Vermont for seven years, from 2004 until 2011. During her tenure, Sanders masterminded an ambitious expansion plan that would have more than doubled the size of the school. To do so, she had the college take on $10 million in debt to finance the purchase of a new, far more expansive campus. The move backfired massively, leading to Sanders’ departure from the college and the near-collapse of the institution.

According to Jonna Spilbor, an attorney who reviewed the documents for TheDCNF, “the college APPEARS to have committed a pretty sophisticated crime” by exaggerating donor commitments in order to secure financing for the deal.

Sanders’ role in bringing Burlington College to the brink of the abyss has been known for years. Research by TheDCNF, however, indicates that Sanders may not just be guilty of bad judgment, but potentially criminal activity enabled by Vermont officials willing to implicitly trust the wife of a sitting senator.

How A College’s Big Dream Turned Into Its Big Nightmare

Burlington College in Burlington, Vermont is a small school by any measure. Founded in 1972 in a person’s living room, the school has consistently had fewer than 300 students. Accordingly, for most of its history it has lacked much of a campus. The school also caters to a relatively niche market interested in programs such as its relatively rare study-abroad program in Cuba.

Jane Sanders hoped to change that through an extremely ambitious expansion effort. A new prime property came onto the Burlington market in 2010: A 32-acre plot on the shores of Lake Champlain owned by the Catholic Diocese of Burlington, which was being sold off to help pay for a $17 million settlement of several sex-abuse lawsuits. The property included one large building– a three-story structure that once served as an orphanage.

Sanders hoped that the former orphanage could be converted into the main structure of a new, expanded campus, which could then provide the space needed for a huge expansion of the college from less than 200 full-time equivalent (FTE) students to over 400.

Such a prime property, though, had a high cost: Over $10 million. That was a great deal of money for a school with essentially no endowment and an annual budget of about $4 million.

In order to finance the purchase, Burlington College presented its case to the Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Finance Agency (VEHBFA), a state agency that issues tax-exempt state bonds for the benefit of non-profit institutions like schools or hospitals.

People’s Bank agreed to purchase the bonds, though in an analysis of the deal commissioned by VEHBFA, consulting firm PFM Group noted that, “The bank’s willingness to fund the loan is contingent upon … the minimum commitment of $2.27 million of grants and donations prior to closing.”

The college dutifully complied, producing a spreadsheet listing 31 confirmed donors who were scheduled to give the school over $2.6 million in donations between 2011 and 2016, including a $1 million commitment scheduled to pay out over five years.

And that was only the bottom limit, Sanders suggested, as there were millions more in verbal pledges or other donations that, while likely, were not set in stone. With those pledges, Burlington’s five-year fundraising projections reach just over $5 million.

Won over by the college’s case, VEHBFA approved its financing, granting the school $6.5 million in tax-exempt bonds.

But in fact, even the smaller figure supplied by Sanders appears to have been anything but “confirmed.” According to audits obtained by TheDCNF, the school listed $1,303,785 in short- and long-term commitments for the year ending June 30, 2011, the same year that the college received the financing.

An accountant that spoke with TheDCNF explained that when non-profit organizations account for donations, future commitments are documented in the present as long as they are legally-binding, no matter when they are due to be collected.

Indeed, the school’s 2011 audit report confirms the use of this procedure, saying, “Contributions, including unconditional promises to give, are recognized as revenue in the period the contribution or promise is received.”

In other words, if Burlington College genuinely had the $2.6 million in confirmed commitments that they claimed on their application for VEHBFA financing, then the full amount should have showed up on their FY 2011 audit.

A little more than $1.3 million of the total claimed by the college, though, seems to have simply disappeared like vapor.

That’s not the only red flag from the school’s 2011 audit. Of the $1.3 million in listed contributions, by far the largest is a “binding estate gift” of $1 million that the college says it expects to collect more than five years in the future. This $1 million gift also appears on the school’s 2012 and 2013 audits, and continues to be listed as more than five years from realization.

This is radically different from the million dollar donation the college said it had already confirmed in its VEHBFA application. There, the college described the million dollar gift as being paid in annual installments of $150,000, plus a final one of $100,000.

Christine Plunkett, Sanders’ successor as Burlington College president, explained this shift last summer, when she told a local TV station that after becoming president she was surprised to find that a million dollar “donation” was actually a bequest (Plunkett did not respond to TheDCNF’s interview request).

The accountant who spoke with TheDCNF said such a mistake was egregious, because bequests are far less legally binding (wills can be changed or invalidated). Such bequests shouldn’t be counted as confirmed contributions, he said.

Spilbor said that if Sanders or anybody else had knowingly garnished their confirmed donation figures, it would be “a pretty clear cut case” of fraud committed against the state.

“One way in which fraud occurs, is when a borrower (in this case, the college) acquires ownership of real property under false pretenses— such as misrepresented income and asset information on a loan application,” she explained.

TheDCNF raised the matter in a phone call with Sanders, who denied any obfuscation, saying, “We gave the entire VEHBFA board very clear indications of what money was in hand; what money was expected; what money was absolutely not able to be revoked; so I don’t know what to tell you.”

“I do know that everything was very straightforward,” Sanders continued, noting that the plan “was approved by our board of trustees, by the Republican governor of Vermont, by the VEHBFA board, and by the bank’s board, so it was not some pie in the sky.”

Moreover, she said, “There was an outside nonprofit organization that looked at everything we did for VEHBFA,” a reference to the PFM Group analysis (PFM is not itself a nonprofit, but conducts analyses exclusively for government and nonprofit groups).

Spilbor noted that part of the blame also belongs with People’s Bank, saying, “if you elect to hold a note for a buyer/borrower, you’d better do your due diligence.”

Even so, she said, “the college APPEARS to have committed a pretty sophisticated crime. Whether prosecutors will do anything about it, is a whole other story.”

Early Warnings

So why didn’t the professionals at VEHBFA and People’s Bank notice anything amiss at the time?

Tom Pelham was one of the people who voted on Burlington College’s proposal, and one of the handful who voted no. Pelham was not an official member of VEHBFA’s board, but he attended meetings and voted in the place of Vermont’s state secretary of administration, an ex officio member who coordinated his vote with Pelham.

Most votes at VEHBFA were a straightforward affair; often, individual votes weren’t even logged. Pelham told TheDCNF that the Burlington College case so appalled him that he demanded that his objections be recorded. He said the deal was exceptional in how flawed it appeared from the outset, and also described it as rushed, with a “fire sale” environment he didn’t see in other schools that approached VEHBFA with financing plans.

“I thought it was bad for the church and the city, and I thought it was highly risky, and that the only ones who would benefit would be the bank and some future developer who would buy the bank out.”

Pelham said that, from his memory, Burlington College’s proposal was based on a dramatic, unprecedented surge in donations to the college:

”I recall that the promised level of fundraising was a huge leap from their track record, and that the fundraising associated with this was not on an established trend line for Burlington College. They could have had a couple million dollars in absolutely secured commitments, and that would not have changed my mind.”

Ultimately, Pelham said, the fact that the proposal was being pushed by the wife of a U.S. senator and former mayor of Burlington likely played a big role, explaining that, “People get star-struck by high-level politicians.”

“My guess is that if someone other than Jane Sanders had been president of Burlington College, there might have been a different outcome,” he said.

Greg Guma, who covered Burlington’s growing financial difficulties as a reporter for the Vermont Digger and recently ran an unsuccessful campaign for mayor of Burlington, told TheDCNF that the deal was plagued by excessive optimism from the beginning, thanks to the involvement of influential figures including Jane Sanders and Tony Pomerleau, a real estate developer who provided a $500,000 bridge loan to facilitate the transaction.

“Jane was president, Pomerleau was the broker of the sale who convinced Jane it was something she should do, and the reason everybody felt it was safe to do this is because with Bernie and the connections he has, and with Tony and the connections he has, how could it fail?”

“Pomerleau is known as the ‘godfather of retail shopping centers’ in Vermont,” Guma noted, “and that was probably enough for the bank.”

“Banks go on the strength of confidence; banks have confidence in certain people and not in others,” he pointed out.

When TheDCNF mentioned those speculations to Sanders, however, she replied that, “That’s not how business is done in Vermont; nobody gets preferential treatment, and I never asked for it. I know it’s an easy shot, but it wasn’t the case.”

Vermont has a “D+” on their “Corruption Risk Report Card,” according to The State Integrity organization, a project of the Center for Public Integrity. The ranking, which puts the Green Mountain State 26th out of 50 states, includes an “F” for “ethics enforcement agencies.”

On Sep. 26, 2011, less than a year after orchestrating the property purchase and with two years remaining in her contract, Jane Sanders abruptly resigned as president of Burlington College.

Her future with the college had already been in doubt for several weeks, according to the Vermont Digger, after “negotiations over a new contract stalled as doubts emerged about her plans and fundraising.”

Few expected her resignation, though, until about a week before Sanders stepped down, when reporters learned of a special meeting of Burlington’s Board of Trustees to discuss her removal. Possibly hastened by the leak, Sanders’ lawyers and the college reached a settlement several days later under which Sanders collected a roughly $200,000 severance package.

The school gave no reason for her departure, and the Digger reported at the time that, “her decision to leave is the result of differences with the trustees over the college’s direction and future.”

Sanders, who describes herself as “very open and honest with the press,” declined to elaborate for TheDCNF, saying simply that she and the board “had differences in terms of what the future of the college should be like, and I decided that it was best for me to leave and let them do what they wanted.”

Guma, on the other hand, told The DCNF that Sanders’ departure had everything to do with the school’s dire financial straits.

“The specific reason [Sanders resigned] is that she did not raise the money, and she took credit for raising money that other people had actually raised,” Guma said. “I know that for a fact because I’m friends with a member of the board who was on the board at the time.”

A College In Ruins

Matters failed to improve under Sanders’ successor, her former vice president, Christine Plunkett, who was unable to increase either enrollment or contributions during her three-year tenure.

The college also abandoned a multi-year capital campaign intended to help finance the property purchase during Plunkett’s administration, Sanders said, explaining that, “They decided to go in a different direction than we had articulated or put out in our development plan, and some donors chose not to participate anymore.”

“I really am not in a position, nor do I want to be in a position, to judge what people did after I left,” she said, but added, “I have no doubt that if [my plan] would have been implemented as set forth, the college would be in great shape.”

After taking over for Sanders, the Burlington Free Press reports that Plunkett presided over a continuing deterioration of the school’s finances, culminating in the college being placed on probationary status by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges, a regional accreditation agency, in July 2014.

The news prompted concern at VEHBFA, internal emails obtained by TheDCNF reveal. On July 24, VEHBFA board member Cathy Hilgendorf wrote to the agency’s executive director, Robert Giroux, saying, “I am concerned as a VEHBFA board member: will there be bad press for the Financing Agency, could we have seen this coming, and would we have denied the bond application?”

Giroux responded the same day that, “Making the decision using hindsight, I am guessing the Board would not have approved the financing,” but that the decision “seems sound based on what we knew then.”

The very next day, Giroux contacted Plunkett, saying he had “noticed that the Agency was not sent copies of Burlington College’s FY’11, FY’12, and FY’13 financial audits as required by our loan agreement,” indicating that the agency had not been monitoring the agreement since it was finalized.

Several months after Plunkett’s resignation in August, Burlington College was able to retire a portion of its outstanding debt from the property purchase by selling about 26 acres of undeveloped land to real estate developer Eric Farrell for about $7 million, though it remains unclear whether the deal will be enough to restore the school to solvency.

Whether or not Burlington College ultimately survives, the episode will surely remain an ignominious one in the school’s history, and could become a larger issue for voters if Sen. Sanders decides to run for president.

Follow Peter Fricke on Twitter

Follow Peter Fricke on Twitter


20 posted on 09/30/2015 11:54:42 AM PDT by COUNTrecount (Race Baiting...... "It's What's For Breakfast")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

It makes you wonder when a person does not want to reveal that information. It should take 10 minutes— you just call the campaign.


24 posted on 09/30/2015 1:35:04 PM PDT by freespirit2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Sanders has a “memory which is
seared — seared — in” him.


25 posted on 09/30/2015 1:42:31 PM PDT by pluvmantelo (My hope for America died 11-06-12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
Traveling to Israel would have been a non event relative to the draft. Unless he became an Israeli citizen, he didn't, in which case he'd not only be subject to our leaky draft, but service in the IDF, which is less leaky.

You pose an interesting question though, and the timeline would be interesting.

Born in 1941, pre lottery the draft covered individuals to 29. Graduated college and was married in 1964. No biggie. Sure he had a college deferment, which is fine. I had one, so did lots of people.

Having served with married individuals I took a look at the deferment rules. Only from internet sources, he was married in 1964. The marriage exemption didn't disappear till late 1965, and I think it was grandfathered. So Bernie was OK.

Maybe. In 1966 he divorced his wife of two years. My draft board would have noticed that.

I assume that's when the CO appeal kicked in. How long could that take?

When the lottery came in in 1969 , the birth years began at 1944, passing him by.

So somehow Bernie skated from 1966 to 1969, with a deferment of some sort.

Could it take 3 years to resolve a CO application? Maybe for a University of Chicago grad, but I assume you'd probably need connections.

29 posted on 09/30/2015 7:18:05 PM PDT by SJackson (Everybody has a plan until they get hit. Mike Tyson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson