Skip to comments.
Obama to meet Netanyahu in November
The Hill ^
| 9/16/15
| Jordan Fabian
Posted on 09/17/2015 4:18:38 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will hold a highly anticipated meeting with President Obama on November 9, the White House announced Wednesday.
Obama and Netanyahu are expected to discuss the Iran nuclear agreement and a new security assistance deal, among other issues.
“Prime Minister Netanyahu's visit is a demonstration of the deep and enduring bonds between the United States and Israel as well as the unprecedented security cooperation, including our close consultations to further enhance Israel's security,” Press Secretary Josh Earnest said in a statement.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bibi; contrast; manchild
A man will go to DC and meet a pro-terrorist occupant of the Oval Office.
I hope that during the sit down, Israel wipes out Iran's nuclear facilities.
To: SoFloFreeper
Just another opportunity to leave Netanyahu downstairs at our White House while he goes upstairs by himself to have “dinner” with the family.
2
posted on
09/17/2015 4:21:25 AM PDT
by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: SoFloFreeper
The only place Obama is likely to use nation-killing lethal force is against Israel. I suspect that has been the only threat holding Israel back from dealing with Iran. Somehow Israel must hold on until January 20, 2017. Iran knows that’s the limit of their safety.
To: SoFloFreeper
Obama the Muslim snake will try and further compromise Netanyahu and prepare Israel for the fimal Islamic solution. Anything Obama does will be to help Iran and hurt Israel.
4
posted on
09/17/2015 4:24:53 AM PDT
by
Truth29
To: SoFloFreeper
None of the candidates brought up the most galling feature of our Muslim president’s deal with Iran. The USA pledges that it will defend Iran if it is attacked by Israel!!! That is simply insane and every Democrat should have to answer for Obama’s treason in this matter.
5
posted on
09/17/2015 4:27:40 AM PDT
by
txrefugee
To: Truth29
Obama: Nah-nah-ne-nah-nah! Take that Bibi!
Bibi: Mr. President, you just increased the likely hood that Iran will develop ICBMs to hit the US mainland sometime in 2017...
Obama: ...Nah...what? I thought they were developing those bombs for you! Ha!
Bibi: No, Sir, I am afraid these are our most recent OFEK-7 satellite images and the Iranians have assembled long range ICBMs with Nuclear warheads all pointing at New York and Washington...
Obama: What!? Are you nuts again? They told me the missiles were for Israel only!
Bibi: Look at the pictures Mr. President, look! Why did you give them this capability?
Obama: Oh, whatever! I am out of this office in a few months, What Me Worry?
Bibi: Isn't that question straight out of MAD magazines’ Alfred E. Newman?
Obama: Why yes it is Bibi, good for you, now you know who I really am!! Psssst, please don't publicize that, ok?
6
posted on
09/17/2015 4:31:37 AM PDT
by
Netz
To: SoFloFreeper
Aug 2015...
========================================================================
Trump: Iran Deal Requires U.S. Protecting Iran in Event of Israeli Strike
by Jacob Kornbluh
Sept 2, 2015
In a phone interview with CNN Tuesday evening, Trump claimed that there’s “something in the Iran deal” that “people don’t understand” saying if someone attacks Iran, “we have to come to their defense.”
“Does that include Israel?” Trump asked. “And most people say yes, they don’t have an exclusion for Israel. So if Israel attacks Iran, according to that deal, I believe, the way it reads, unless they have a codicil or they have something to it, that we have to fight with Iran against Israel.” ..."
Trump was most probably referring to language highlighted by the opponents of the deal. On page 142, the deal includes a clause that states, “Co-operation through training and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to protect against, and respond to nuclear security threats, including sabotage, as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems.”
Washington-based Center for Security Policy asserted that Annex III appears “to commit the United States and other world powers to the defense of Iran’s nuclear program.”
http://jpupdates.com/2015/09/02/trump-iran-deal-requires-u-s-protecting-iran-in-event-of-israeli-strike/
7
posted on
09/17/2015 4:39:52 AM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: SoFloFreeper
Why would Bibi go to DC to see our terrorist supporting president? He wouldn’t go sit down with Iran, why Obama?
8
posted on
09/17/2015 5:05:29 AM PDT
by
ThePatriotsFlag
( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
To: SoFloFreeper
It’ll be refreshing for Obama; he hasn’t f***ed anyone up the butt since law school.
To: SoFloFreeper
Fifteen rounds, no TKO’s?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson