no Hillary? thank goodness.
Sounds like there’s some real money to be made, since there is no way Mrs. Clinton is going to be elected dog catcher. The only reason she’s running is to keep the Justice Department looking the other way.
Doesn’t even matter. After the current Preezy was “elected” I said we would never have another Republican as Preezy. I hope I am wrong.
The Trump brand is undervalued and the Bush brand is overvalued.
Investors are hedging their bets and they think the current love affair with Trump will fade by early next year.
That and September polls historically are a poor predictor of the eventual GOP nominee.
I think they’ll do a subtle take-down of Trump.
Folks aren’t going to be happy about it, and it will cause him to reach 35 to 40% plus commonly in the polls.
There are questions you can ask, to make it look you’re trying to sound intellectual, like Hewitt tried to do, that will cause the public to see exactly what he was up to.
Folks aren’t in any mood to watch Trump get gamed with questions that don’t pertain to this policies, or information that he doesn’t have to know at this point.
The little groups of pseudo native Americans with their hatchets out here looking for pundit scalps, should put the fear of god into the usual suspects.
Yes, there are more than enough voters in our cemeteries to guarantee a victory for Hillary in 2016.
“The Donald is ranked 3rd in the betting (after Rubio) ....”
Well that tells you right there you that this ranking can’t have any reliable accuracy, since Rubio has a better chance that his hairline will spontaneously stop receding than he does of winning the nomination.
I honestly can’t see Bush getting it. I think Trump is unlikely because he’s not a conservative, something that will emerge more with the debates, and Carson is a conservative but will probably not be considered tough enough.
Walker and Cruz just don’t come across well in the media for some reason. I’ve never seen either of them in person, although I’d be more inclined to vote for Walker than for Cruz simply because Walker has actually been able to accomplish things but Cruz can’t seem to get enough support to actually achieve his goals.
I like Fiorina, who does have conservative positions and is firm and an engaging speaker, but I’m not sure Republicans would vote for a woman.
So I’m not sure who will come out on top, but it will probably be a compromise candidate like Kasich. That is, Bush positions but not Bush.
As for Hillary, Obama and his gang hate her almost as much as they hate her husband, and I have never thought - even leaving aside her lack of ability and gifts - that she’d be the candidate. I think it’s going to be Biden for the Dems.
looks like some easy money to be made here by betting NO on certain candidates. betting yes is riskier because of the risk of assassination.