Posted on 09/15/2015 3:43:16 AM PDT by nikos1121
In a country with more than 300 million people, it is remarkable how obsessed the media have become with just one Donald Trump. What is even more remarkable is that, after six years of repeated disasters, both domestically and internationally, under a glib egomaniac in the White House, so many potential voters are turning to another glib egomaniac to be his successor.
No doubt much of the stampede of Republican voters toward Mr. Trump is based on their disgust with the Republican establishment. The fact that the next two biggest vote-getters in the polls are also complete outsiders Dr. Ben Carson and Ms. Carly Fiorina reinforces the idea that this is a protest. It is easy to understand why there would be pent-up resentments among Republican voters. But are elections held for the purpose of venting emotions? No national leader ever aroused more fervent emotions than Adolf Hitler did in the 1930s. Watch some old newsreels of German crowds delirious with joy at the sight of him. The only things at all comparable in more recent times were the ecstatic crowds that greeted Barack Obama when he burst upon the political scene in 2008. Elections, however, have far more lasting, and far more serious or even grim consequences than emotional venting. The actual track record of crowd-pleasers, whether Juan Peron in Argentina, Obama in America, or Hitler in Germany, is very sobering, if not painfully depressing.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/424008/donald-trump-voters-election-egomaniac
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
He doesn't hold a candle to the damage the professional political class has done.
There are other candidates than Bush, you realize?
This is false, but it can be made true with a single insert: "Now Is No Time to Be Voting for President Based solely on Emotion"
We SHOULD be emotional about the existential threat to our nation posed by an open Southern border. We SHOULD be emotional about our unemployed brothers and sisters, and their children being cheated out of a future.
Those emotions can lead to poor choices, but they can also lead to meaningful, positive change.
The Trump movement IS very emotional. But that's not all it is.
Did he feel this way back in 2008? Because thats exactly what the voting public did and how we ended up with the debacle we have now.
A Dallas area political reporter summed up the Trump campaign last night after his report on the Trump rally. He called it Hope and Change 2.0 Basically, an empty slogan with not many ideas discussed.
I am sure that Sowell recognized the Obama hysteria for what it was.
This projection of our deepest wishes upon the promise of one man is no way to actually obtain your goals.
Exactly. He remains an empty vessel into which desperate conservatives can pour their hopes and dreams. They will vote for whom they imagine him to be, no matter that it bears no relation to reality.
With your seeming revelation that we all MUST vote for any “real candidate” other than Trump, implying the Democrat candidate - whoever he/she is, is much worse, I submit that Jeb Bush as a nominee isn't any different.
I've said this many times here in the last year or so. My main purpose in life here in what I say and do is to stop the candidacy of Jeb Bush in any way possible. It is my imperative, my raison d’être.
To the point that Trump facilitates that, I am satisfied, mainly because without him (Jeb) gone from the contest there is simply no chance of any of one of those other candidates you might think of as “real” to rise above Jeb's machine.
Without Trump, Bush and the PACs and the RNC would run roughshod right over all the other candidates. Freeze them out, drown them with attacks (with willing Dem MSM help, I'd add).
Additionally, Trump's position has forced some of our lesser knowns in the contest to take a stand (or not) - e.g., Walker with his "I'll decide later on amnesty after we close the border" and his latest "I'll bust up the Unions", or Carson's popularity (why, I'll never know - he's a gun grabber and an amnesty shill), or even some of the others. They'd all be flailing in the wind against Bush, and with NO coverage at all. Right now, the coverage they do get is when it's anti-Trump. The smart ones on the slate are the ones keeping their mouths shut about Trump.
Meanwhile, Jebito is off speaking Spanish somewhere and glad handing with big business donors ready, willing and able to sell our sovereignty and jobs down the river to make a buck.
There are other candidates than Bush, you realize?
I’m done talking with you.
Wow...way to project and infer things that were patently not said. I blame Obama, I blame disgusting Democrats and would love to bitch slap everyone one of them on their way to prison. I blame feckless, linguini spined Republicans who pretend to be conservative. And in a few years if this train wreck actually fools enough of you to get elected, I will blame all of you who are worshiping at the cult of personality...who project all of your desires upon a man with ZERO demonstrable conservative principles (prior to 4 months ago), EXACTLY The way the Libs did 7 yrs ago.
If you’re gonna drink the koolaid, at least man up and admit you’re drinking the koolaid, instead of trying to convince us that the man is a conservative savior. He is a pompous narcissist who has done NOTHING in his entire life to prove he is a conservative. But hey, he talks a good game doesn’t he?
There are enough entrenched anti-American and anti-Constitutional forces between the Rats and Rinos that the country needs someone they would deem a bomb thrower. Many people now realize this. But when the targets are embedded within the people a Curtis LeMay style bombing campaign will do a lot of collateral damage, potentially enough to turn our new allies back to the dark side. What we need is a “smart bomb” thrower who can identify the targets, know the policies (well known here) needed to precisely target them AND have the willpower to actually release them. Trump is using the Norden bombsight with WWII era munitions. His supporters fervently believe his results will be as accurate as those remaining heroes still swear they achieved with dumb bombs and that bombsight. Alas I know post war analysis long ago proved them wrong. They made a huge mess, but did not nearly as much good as they thought. I want Mitch, Hillary and friends to feel like that unluckiest driver in Iraq. Trump is over the target, taking flack, but does he have the Right weapon load for the task?
No they don’t realize it....in their minds, because they’ve been blinded by their very justified hatred of the GOPe, it’s the incredibly flawed and downright awful Trump or Bush. Meanwhile the conservative candidates who’ve actually walked the walk are left languishing...
Yet another election where we shoot ourselves in the a$$ and after the fact say, “well golly he SAID he was conservative!”
“Yes, Mr. Sowell, we are emotional.”
The argument that “your candidate’s supporters are emotional” is so stupid, stupid, stupid.
ALL partisans have emotional reasons for supporting their candidate- and the leading candidate, by definition, has the most emotion-based support.
NRO must have a quota for irrational anti-Trump articles.
Well said. How ya been, Dave?
Trump has absolutely no experience defeating opposition.
Trump’s experience is making deals with people that want to get the same results as he does but how they get those results is different.
People that don’t want to sell their land for his deals, Trump has no problem bringing people into the deal that can have the govt take the land for his deals.
That alone is all I need to know about Trump to know putting him into the WH is not only stupid it’s dangerous.
There is absolutely nothing about the democrat agenda that I want to see advanced by making deals with them.
I want to see the democrat agenda undone.
Ups and downs. But nothing to complain about now. You?
“maniacal ravings of the more rabid Trump supporters”
Gee, I’d like to see some of that maniacal raving. Got a link?
“Not possible with Trump sucking all of the oxygen out of the room.”
Looks to me like the stronger, more popular candidate is getting more coverage than the weaker, less popular candidates.
And this is wrongful because...?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.