Russia has information that the US knows the position of the IG (ISIS), but not to bomb them

Parliamentary News ^ | 09/13/15

[444Flyer]

Hey Pootie Poot. Tell us something we don’t know.

[ETL]

Obama and Putin share the same basic “new international order” vision: weak US, strong Russia and China.

[Enlightened1]

So you really think the Administration is serious with ISIS?

Did you think the Iran deal was good too?

[the_daug]

“Seems it doesn’t take very much to fool some of us.”

You mean like Debka WND.

This all started in the “Arab Spring” uprisings. If the US under King Amabo an even Bush too want to topple governments they better be prepared. Islam abhors democracy there is only submission.

[ETL]

Did you think the Iran deal was good too?

Your boy Putin LOVES the deal!
=====================================

Aug 2015...

______________________________________________________

Trump: Iran Deal Requires U.S. Protecting Iran in Event of Israeli Strike

by Jacob Kornbluh
Sept 2, 2015

In a phone interview with CNN Tuesday evening, Trump claimed that there’s “something in the Iran deal” that “people don’t understand” saying if someone attacks Iran, “we have to come to their defense.”

“Does that include Israel?” Trump asked. “And most people say yes, they don’t have an exclusion for Israel. So if Israel attacks Iran, according to that deal, I believe, the way it reads, unless they have a codicil or they have something to it, that we have to fight with Iran against Israel.” ..."

Trump was most probably referring to language highlighted by the opponents of the deal. On page 142, the deal includes a clause that states, “Co-operation through training and workshops to strengthen Iran’s ability to protect against, and respond to nuclear security threats, including sabotage, as well as to enable effective and sustainable nuclear security and physical protection systems.”

Washington-based Center for Security Policy asserted that Annex III appears “to commit the United States and other world powers to the defense of Iran’s nuclear program.”

http://jpupdates.com/2015/09/02/trump-iran-deal-requires-u-s-protecting-iran-in-event-of-israeli-strike/

[NonValueAdded]

Of course we do! JSTARS has been active in the area and we likely have a comprehensive up-to-the-minute map down to small-unit locations. Shades of LBJ.

[BeadCounter]

60 country coalition so that means 59 other countries go along.

[ETL]

Hey Pootie Poot. Tell us something we don’t know.

Yeah, Pootie, explain this...

We just got the clearest sign yet that Russia doesn't really care about fighting ISIS in Syria
Business Insider ^ | 12 Sep 15 | Natasha Bertrand

Moscow will reportedly provide Russian troops in Syria with an advanced antiaircraft missile system as part of its military support for Syrian president Bashar Assad.

"This system is the advanced version used by Russia, and it's meant to be operated by Russians in Syria," a Western diplomat who is regularly briefed on US, Israeli, and other intelligence assessments told Reuters.

And as The Daily Beast's Michael Weiss points out, any antiaircraft missiles deployed by Russian troops in Syria won't be directed at ISIS, since ISIS has no air force.

In fact, none of the rebels do — only government forces have access to aircraft.

Russia has substantially increased its military presence in Syria over the past two weeks under the guise of helping the embattled Assad fight ISIS and other extremists. ..."

(Excerpt) Read more at Business Insider ...

[ETL]

Looks like Putin and Obama have something in common, siding with ISIS.

Obama and Putin pretty much share the same new world order vision: weaker US, stronger Russia. So I wouldn't put anything past him. Russia is simply seeking to expand their power and influence in the Middle East with an Russia-Syria-Iran axis. In the meantime, they are building a massive military base on the Russia-Ukraine border.

[Red Badger]

They didn’t flee Assad when he was solely in power, so they ain’t fleeing him, it’s ISIS.............................

[ETL]

...as well as a “major seaport” with the ChiComs.

[ETL]

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
______________________________________________________________

"Joint war games are a logical outcome of the Sino-Russian Friendship and Cooperation Treaty signed in 2001, and reflect the shared worldview and growing economic ties between the two Eastern Hemisphere giants."

http://www.heritage.org/research/commentary/2005/09/war-games-russia-china-grow-alliance

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,170287,00.html
______________________________________________________________

Sept 11, 2014

China and Russia to build major seaport: report

China and Russia will build one of the largest ports in north-east Asia on Russia’s Sea of Japan coast, reports say, in a further sign of the powerhouses’ growing alliance.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-09-11/china-and-russia-to-build-major-seaport-report/5738036
______________________________________________________________

Obama: "We Welcome China's Rise"
CBS News ^ | January 19, 2011 | Stephanie Condon

[Enlightened1]

He ain’t my boy Troll.

You really think Obama is fighting ISIS????

ROTFLMAO!

Like I said only Kool-Aid drinkers believe the Administration is serious about ISIS.

[the_daug]

Since King Amabo and Putin don’t talk they want to discourage accidental air incursions where personnel are operating.

[ETL]

He [Putin] ain’t my boy

All you ever seem to do is post things that support him and his actions.

[Krosan]

These questions are not relevant. We were talking about RT.com being banned on FR and for a reason. Your Russian language site is even more blatant Russian state propaganda.

[Enlightened1]

Oh so are we really attacking ISIS, who is now being allowed to come into Europe and the United States for welfare, free housing and healthcare, is not relevant?????????????

It’s very relevant question. It’s very hot topic and you are defending the Administration of toppling the Syrian government?

If that happens, then guess who will be running Syria????

ISIS

[DannyTN]

Are we trying to use ISIS to take out Syria’s assad? And if so, to what end. ISIS would be worse than Assad. Eventually you have to destroy the beast that’s left.

[Enlightened1]

Exactly!

Not to mention ISIS is butchering Christians, raping women and children, and beheading everyone they get their hands on.

[tcrlaf]

Blah..
Blah..
Blah...