...will reveal the true nature of almost all GOPe House and Senate members as
Posted on 09/11/2015 2:06:48 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
A senior Senate Republican leadership source reached out to discuss the case I laid out this morning (linked an excerpted by Allahpundit here) concerning a possible path to breaking Democrats’ Iran deal filibuster. He said Majority Leader McConnell will schedule another cloture vote early next week, likely on Tuesday. If and when that fails (assuming none of the 42 filibustering Democrats relent), GOP leadership is considering a number of options, including forcing votes on one or more highly-charged amendments related to the Iran deal. This maneuver would respond to Democrats’ politicized posturing in kind, contriving scenarios in which filibuster-sustaining votes would be politically painful to cast, and could be used in future attack ads. The aide declined to provide details on the substance of these potential amendments.
As for whether upper chamber Republicans are girding for a bruising fight in which all Senate business is ground to a halt until Democrats cease their obstruction of an up-or-down Iran vote, the source demurred. Leadership is keen on moving other items to the floor in the coming weeks, including a ban on late-term abortions, as well as a government funding bill. With the clock ticking toward a potential partial government shutdown, the time frame for a protracted battle over what ultimately amounts to a symbolic vote is limited, he said. McConnell has stated repeatedly that Congressional Republicans will not allow another government shutdown, a move critics have blasted as preemptive disarmament. The aide also said that a key difference between the sex trafficking filibuster brawl Republicans won this spring and the current scenario is that Democratic members actually wanted to pass the trafficking legislation, whereas they’ve lined up against the Iran deal disapproval resolution.
Point taken, but I’d argue that obstructing an Iran vote is uniquely precarious for Democrats. The Senate voted 98-1 to demand a say over the deal, with yes votes coming from all 42 Senators who’ve now joined a filibuster to prevent their own legislative body from having that say. As I’ve detailed in my original post, the American people have turned sharply against the nuclear agreement, and a supermajority of voters believes Congress must approve of the deal before it’s implemented. The House just voted against the deal by a 107-vote margin, with more than two dozen Democrats joining the opposition. It’s true President Obama’s power grab has guaranteed that his unilateral accord will go into effect without Congress’ approval. But Senate Democrats have cynically decided to strip themselves of a vote on the matter altogether — all to spare Obama the procedural humiliation of overruling the legislative branch’s bipartisan rejection of his reckless policy. Democrats should be made to defend this unpopular stance, publicly and often. Their arguments are weak, and the public isn’t inclined to buy their feeble talking points. Such a reckoning won’t occur unless Republicans really force the issue, which unfortunately requires manufacturing some political theater to cut through the noise. Speeches, statements, and press availabilities won’t suffice.
If GOP leadership is unwilling to exploit their control over the legislative agenda — afforded to them by voters in 2014 — in order to fight on an issue of enormous geopolitical and national security consequence, and on which they enjoy a substantial public opinion advantage, what is the point of having a majority? (For what it’s worth, I pose this cynical question as a supporter of the Corker/Cardin bill, which every Republican Senator but Tom Cotton voted for). I’ll leave you with Marco Rubio’s take on Fox News earlier today. Spot on:
“We should be creative about doing everything possible — if there was ever an issue on which we would stop everything to focus on something like a laser, it would be this. And instead, I get the sense that it’s like, ‘let’s have a couple votes then let’s move on to the next issue. This thing is done with.'”
Are Republican leaders interested in pursuing creative solutions here? A more instructive question, perhaps: How would Democratic leadership play their cards if the roles were reversed? Oh, and here’s the White House’s cavalier, childish attitude toward all of this. Laugh it up:
White House mocks Republicans again for scheming to prevent Iran deal, says it probably seemed like a good idea after a couple of margaritas
— Francesca Chambers (@fran_chambers) September 11, 2015
Editor’s note: A version of this item is cross-posted at Townhall.com
Senator McConnell will say it’s not feasible.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...............No.
They don’t have any balls so they certainly don’t know how to play hard ball.
Oh hell no! Peaceful be thy dreams.
And...laugh at Hillary now, because you’ll be arrested for it later, if you get my drift.
No they will not. McConnell seems to be in Obama’s pocket.
The senate repubs will only play with each other. They are feckless, flaccid traitors to their electorate. Anything they do or say is kabuki theater.
Dems like Baraq, Pelosi, and Reid were trained by the Mob.
And Republicans like Boehner and McConnell were trained by country clubs.
It does make a difference....
They, intellectually shortchanged as they are, can always find a way, by hook or by crook, to frustrate "procedure and decorum," and they know how to defeat the enemy.
Legal, illegal, Constitutional Unconstitutional, doesn't matter.
Losers are losers. There are no points for proper procedure and decorum. Winners make the rules.
Losers just fade away.
But never, it seems, soon enough.
Why is there still a filibuster? Just kill it. Reid already killed it to saddle America with two dozen far-left lifetime judge confirmations. Why not Iran?
...will reveal the true nature of almost all GOPe House and Senate members as
McConnell is out looking for his gonads with both hands and a mirror and finding NADA. Boehner is likewise looking for his and finding NADA. They’re not worthy of licking the bottoms of our troops boots, IMO.
No.
How can you play hardball with no balls ?
No.
The big lie without congressional approval. Congress pre-approved this deal so they could later say they were against it but can't stop it.
There is no rational reason that can be imagined that can explain this tyranny.
Republican Hardball:
Its the bottom of the ninth, bases loaded, down by 3, winning run at the plate. Here comes ol’ Mitchy McConnell up to the plate.
Look! He is letting the pitcher throw strikes and he is not even swinging. He is just standing there leaning on the bat. Oh my God! He is throwing the game!
Post game interview:
Mitch:Well, I knew the chances of me hitting a grand slam were pretty low and if I did hit it, someone would probably catch it and you know there is always next year.
Good ol’ Mitch, always thinking of the team.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.