Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wall Street expert: Clinton Foundation a 'vast criminal conspiracy'
WND ^ | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 09/11/2015 3:28:47 AM PDT by HomerBohn

Edited on 09/11/2015 3:29:52 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: wastoute

Even more unnerving-—she’s still hanging on as a candidate.
This tells me the cunning Clintons have already connived the votes to elect her.

Probably did all the dirty work in the big electoral numbers states....like Obama did to fake his 2012 win.

The Clintons are beholden to thousands of entities...all waiting for payback w/ Hillary wielding the presidential pen.


21 posted on 09/11/2015 4:25:46 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Liz

What the hell does one do in Lebanon that makes a billion dollars?


22 posted on 09/11/2015 4:47:04 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Will the same folks whine when Trump says of Hillary, “Just look at that face...”


23 posted on 09/11/2015 4:49:00 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

Good question.....very few people know.....here or there.


24 posted on 09/11/2015 4:52:02 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

I have a dream of Hillary and bill Clinton being guarded by the secret service as they await punishment for a capital crime.


25 posted on 09/11/2015 4:55:17 AM PDT by PCPOET7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Do you ever feel like Nietsche? Wandering the planet looking for ONE principled man?


26 posted on 09/11/2015 4:56:25 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All
WRT the sell-off of strategic US uranium assets under Hillary's watch---
the NYT reported on uranium investors who also donated to the Clinton Foundation:

Canadian Frank Giustra--globe-trotting pal of Bill---donated $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more to the Clinton Foundation. Giustra built a company that later merged with Uranium One. Seems to have facilitated the uranium sell-off.

Canadian Ian Telfer--donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it.

Paul Reynolds--donated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company.

Frank Holmes---donated $250,000 to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011.

Canadian Neil Woodyer---Founded Endeavour Mining with Giustra--donated $50,000 to $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Adviser to Uranium One.

GMP Securities Ltd.---Donating portion of profits to the Clinton Foundation. Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One.

27 posted on 09/11/2015 5:03:14 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All

The muck now surfacing from the greedy Clintons is bad enough-—but what they’re hiding is the bigger problem.

ITEM—The NY Times reported the “Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership” collected about $33 million US tax dollars from Hillary’s State Dept between 2008 and 2013.....$25 million of which was passed back across the border to the US-based Clinton Foundation. Plus-—Giustra pledged $100 million to the Foundation after Clinton helped him clinch the mega-bucks uranium deal.

ITEM-—millions of dollars and 1,100 donors are shrouded in mystery in the Canadian Giustra/Clinton operation. The Clinton Foundation signed a “memorandum of understanding” with the Obama White House agreeing to reveal its contributors every year.

The agreement stipulates that the “Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative” (as the charity was then-known) is part of the Clinton Foundation and must follow “the same protocols.”

SURPRISE: It hasn’t.

Caught w/ his pants down, Giustra’s backtracking like crazy-—saying Canada’s federal privacy law “forbids” the Canadian-registered Clinton charity, from revealing its donors. A memo he provided news organs cites “fiduciary obligations” to its contributors and Canada’s Personal Information Privacy and Electronic Disclosure Act. “We are not allowed to disclose even to the Clinton Foundation the names of our donors,” Giustra says.

However, Canadian tax and privacy law experts were dubious of the Clinton/Giustra claims. A former director knowledgeable about tax policy at Canada’s Department of Finance, said he wasn’t aware of any tax laws that would prevent the Clinton charity from releasing its donors’ names. “There’s nothing that would preclude them from releasing donors’ names. It’s entirely up to them.”

more below


28 posted on 09/11/2015 5:06:54 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
He's a mining expert...he facilitated the takeover of US uranium assets.... he received tax dollars from Hillary's State Dept.

Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is one of the Clinton Foundation’s largest donors. Giustra's $100 million contributions go directly:

<><> (1) to the tax-exempt Clinton Foundation, and,

<><> (2) to the Canada-based "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership."

The "Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Partnership" in turn sends money to the Clinton Foundation...(according to Canadian tax records researched by "Clinton Cash" author Schweizer).

DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada);
Canadian tax records; compiled by Alberto Cuadra and
Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM

ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton- foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4-90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html

29 posted on 09/11/2015 5:07:58 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

you forget that she possesses the FBI files. She will never go to trial to be convicted. To eliminate the risk posed by the files, she must be eliminated, gone


30 posted on 09/11/2015 5:12:30 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ....carson is the kinder gentler trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

No problem....I know a few.


31 posted on 09/11/2015 5:12:41 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

This is correct. Mini-mafia.


32 posted on 09/11/2015 5:23:08 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Then you have been truly blessed.


33 posted on 09/11/2015 5:30:41 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

The email server was always about creating a defense, plausible deniability, for how terrorist and others were getting information.

Simply make the claim the terrorist and others got the information by hacking into her email.

You are seeing it right now with Benghazi and the claim the terrorist could have hacked into Hillary’s email and that is how they new Stevens was going to be in Benghazi on that particular day.

In 2009 Howard Dean let the cat out of the bag the dems had come up with an attempted assassination plot against Obama which they intended to blame on the racist right wing extremist.

Part of the preparations for that attempted assassination plot was prepping the public with stories of the incompetence of the Secret Service and claims Bush’s Secret Service was chock-a-block full of racist that would love to see Obama assassinated.

Hillary got the server put in before Obama took the oath while Bush was President.

Bush would have known about her server.

Hillary and the dems had themselves a nice little false flag set up they could blame on Bush and the racist right wing extremist.

Hillary and the dems cover story, Bush knew about Hillary’s server so Bush had provided the information to the racist right wing extremist who then hacked into Hillary’s email and that is how they knew where Obama was going to be on a particular day.

You might recall Hillary took a trip overseas, Kenya IIRC, and low and behold there was an assassination plot against Hillary.

How did the terrorist know where Hillary was going to be on a particular day so they could plan the attack?

The info came from the Kenyan govt or it came directly from Hillary’s State Dept.

I guess the terrorist hacked into Hillary’s email and that is how they knew where Hillary was going to be on a particular day.

Just like Stevens with Benghazi right?


34 posted on 09/11/2015 5:32:31 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
The email server was always about creating a defense, plausible deniability, for how terrorist and others were getting information.

I think it was more about facilitating communication and movement of information between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation.

With both organizations being housed on the same server, information could move from State Department emails to Clinton Foundation emails, with no external audit trail.

35 posted on 09/11/2015 5:37:18 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

If anything I think it’s they may find evidence of quid pro quo state department favors in exchange for donations to the foundation.


36 posted on 09/11/2015 5:39:04 AM PDT by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a fire"arm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man Standing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Any petty criminal knows to use multiple communication devices/phone numbers/email etc. to make it as hard as possible for anyone(law enforcement) to get information on them that can be used against them.

The Clinton’s aren’t petty criminals. They are a crime syndicate and have surrounded themselves with top notch criminals, so they know to use multiple devices to make it as hard as possible to get information that can be used against them. Go check out how many phone numbers Bill Clinton has. They’re not stupid.

Just like any other crime family, the Clinton crime family had multiple systems set up long before the this server was set up.


37 posted on 09/11/2015 6:02:30 AM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: HomerBohn

Just part of the big Democrat Party crime family.


38 posted on 09/11/2015 6:16:22 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMR 4350
Any petty criminal knows to use multiple communication devices/phone numbers/email etc. to make it as hard as possible for anyone(law enforcement) to get information on them that can be used against them.

This was a different strategy. It would have kept all the evidence of collusion and transfer of classified data between State Department employees and Clinton Foundation clients in one place, under Hillary's control. Multiple servers would have meant multiple audit trails and potential exposure of inappropriate communications. It served to protect Hillary, her campaign staff and Clinton Foundation clients, at the expense of compromising the security of State Department classified data.

39 posted on 09/11/2015 6:17:42 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wastoute

“She and Trump have so much in common. They both made money giving people what they wanted...”

I really fail to understand what your point is, other than you’re another Trump hater.


40 posted on 09/11/2015 6:30:52 AM PDT by nikos1121 ("There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." Thoreau)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson