Posted on 09/10/2015 7:47:03 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
One of the many things that goes unreported and not commented upon in the great Hillary Clinton email server evasion is: What has been the cost to the American taxpayer due to her decision to use a private email server during her time at the State Department and how much more will this cost the taxpayer before this is concluded (if ever)? Another question: while she has said it was "permitted" or "allowed" she has never said "WHO permitted this."
Why hasn't the news media raised this question, if even just among themselves? Why isn't congress raising this question as the 19 separate investigations and multitudinous FOIA requests are being pursued? Meanwhile, the State Department claims it cannot complete the work... needs to have all of this discovery consolidated under one judge... doesn't have the manpower (!!!) to produce the records... and needs to consolidate all of this under a "Transparency Czar" who just happens to be a max-contributor ($2700 this past April, I believe) to the Hillary 2016 campaign. You almost can't make this stuff up.
At the end of this process, Mrs. Billary should be handed the bill for all of this along with her sentence to the appropriate Big House. JMHO.
The cost of a wall?
I think it depends on what amount you put on an American life.
Cost? How about the cost in national security? I would gladly see the “spending” shifting to indicting her for the CRIMES she has committed. Obvious, tangible crimes.
Sounds like we are in for watching another Washington, DC two-step avoidance performance from the political class protecting itself.
Is ANYBODY home in Washington, DC ???
Probably not... it's just one big party to them.
while she has said it was “permitted” or “allowed” she has never said “WHO permitted this.”
This is Clinton speak. No one ever permitted a private server in her home. She didn’t say they did. She was referring to her having private email, not a private server.
I was recently permitted to run a stop sign because no one stopped me.
the true cost is in lives, intelligence, and military secrets.
most people don’t seem to understand... she had to take special steps to set up her own email server. she didn’t have to, as she would’ve been given a standard govt account on the first day in office.
she deliberately opened a security hole through which highly classified information was funneled and available for anyone to see... if they have the ip address (which was supplied for a fee... i’m sure)
Costs? Incalculabe. Criminals/socialists/totalitarians will cost us the republic. Witness history. Witness current events Witness Hillary Clinton.
When all is said and done we’ll probably have to spend hundreds of billions of dollars to repair Clintons crimes.
Since we will have NO idea what information our potential enemies have acquired.
She was Secretary of State. Certainly she received and sent classified information. Let's stipulate that it wasn't on her personal server. So where is it?
bttt
Killary's cell phone rang.
Hello?
"Mrs. Crinton?"
Yes
"Tank choo for the info."
click
Finally! A cartoonist who pulls no punches. Love the cankle.
Congress?!!!
This is joke. Right?
This is Clinton speak. No one ever permitted a private server in her home. She didnt say they did. She was referring to her having private email, not a private server.
*********************************************************************
That distinction should be made every time Hillary tries to obfuscate the issue.
Ambassador Stevens would like to say something about the cost of Hillary’s actions.
This is Clinton speak. No one ever permitted a private server in her home. She didnt say they did. She was referring to her having private email, not a private server.
++++
Actually I don’t think Hillary violated any rules or laws by having a private server in her home. It’s a free country, sort of.
It was the use of that server for government business that, at the minimum, violated State Department rules or policies. While the fact that she did so was widely known within the State Department it is, as you point out, doubtful anyone gave her permission to do so.
Her real problem follows from her sending, receiving an storing TOP SECRET SCI material on that server. That’s jail time for the common man.
SHE permitted it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.