1 posted on
09/07/2015 10:45:29 AM PDT by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
2 posted on
09/07/2015 10:46:12 AM PDT by
TBP
(Obama lies, Granny dies.)
To: jazusamo
It looks like the Supreme Court majority was so devoid of any analytic thought, they couldn’t even foresee the chaos of the ruling in the many states that had laws stipulating marriage as being between a man and a woman. Whatever reason, Justice Kennedy’s need to be the homosexual folk hero excluded doing his job properly.
3 posted on
09/07/2015 10:51:00 AM PDT by
gusopol3
To: jazusamo
Remember the definition of federal tyranny:
FEDERAL TYRANNY IS ANY FEDERAL COURT DECISION, LAW, OR ACT THAT IS NOT AUTHORIZED BY THE CONSTITUTION.
Unconstitutional federal Court decisions, laws, and acts are by definition unconstitutional and should be resisted and nullified at every level.
The Supreme Court is trumped by the Constitution as written as originally understood and intended.
4 posted on
09/07/2015 10:57:50 AM PDT by
Jim W N
To: jazusamo
If we had an opposition party, of if the Republican Congress has any male hormones, she could be out of jail by tomorrow evening.
5 posted on
09/07/2015 10:59:10 AM PDT by
odawg
To: jazusamo
Kentucky Constitutional Amendment 1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kentucky_Constitutional_Amendment_1
Kentucky Constitutional Amendment 1[1] of 2004, is an amendment to the Kentucky Constitution that makes it unconstitutional for the state to recognize or perform same-sex marriages or civil unions. The referendum was approved by 75% of the voters.[2]
The text of the amendment states:
“Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Kentucky. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized.”[3]
6 posted on
09/07/2015 11:05:52 AM PDT by
Jack Hydrazine
(Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
To: jazusamo
When gay activist Elena Kagan was nominated for the Supreme Court a few years ago, I reminded my senator, Claire McCaskill, that Kagan had never been a judge before, but was well known as a gay activist. McCaskill replied that Kagan was “well qualified” for the court. I hope when McCaskill is up for re-election, her opponent will remind voters of that remark, but more importantly, judges are strictly required to be neutral in hearing cases. Kagan’s vote, like Anthony Kennedy's, is therefore null and void. I know that some pro-family legal experts are literally making a federal case of her and Kennedy's failure to recuse themselves, and the issue is NOT resolved.
To: jazusamo
Patent Leather Jackboots are still jackboots.
10 posted on
09/07/2015 11:12:55 AM PDT by
Lexington Green
(Hillary belongs in the Big House - not the White House)
Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!
11 posted on
09/07/2015 11:15:37 AM PDT by
jazusamo
(0bama to go 'full-Mussolini' after elections: Mark Levin....and the turkey has.)
To: jazusamo
20 posted on
09/07/2015 12:32:12 PM PDT by
Guenevere
(If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
To: jazusamo
don’t tell me that this is Jim Bunning’s son. if so johnnie calison needs to go out and punch his face in.
25 posted on
09/07/2015 1:50:48 PM PDT by
kvanbrunt2
(civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
To: jazusamo
Someone should lock up Judge Bunning with no food, water, or Playgirl magazines until he frees the clerk.
29 posted on
09/07/2015 11:22:01 PM PDT by
Impy
(They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson