Interesting how the Enemy Media leaves out all of the above FACTS, ain’t it?
*SPIT*
So, SO tired of all this agenda-driven cr@p.
Why has she been denied bail?
There is no rational reason for it — other than a perverse agenda by the people who put her there.
Kim certainly won’t get any sympathy or calls to action to help her from Trump (or even verbal support from him) like she has gotten from Cruz.
I’m completely disgusted by this. There is absolutely no doubt that the left is seeking to neutralize Christian beliefs, and turn all Christians into compliant, subservient sheep.
This woman was jailed without a trial. She is no danger to anyone. Selective enforcement renders a law invalid. We live in a fascist dictatorship.
I’m completely behind Kim on this, so don’t get me wrong when I ask this question. If she is, indeed, a Democrat, did she vote either time for Obama? It would be severely ironic if she did.
Kim Davis reminds me of the Book of Acts, more specifically, when Simon Peter and John were imprisoned for being faithful to Jesus.
They were not just at peace with their imprisonment, but they were actually joyful that they were able honor Jesus through being persecuted.
Although I am upset that Kim is in prison, at the same time, I am not worried about her because I sense she is glad to be able to serve Jesus in this way.
My prayers and thoughts are with Kim.
You’d never know one word of this from our mainstream media, would you?
Marriage is a church institution.
If I hear one more tv pundit say “I support same-sex “marriage” I’m going to throw up. Don’t these idiots read the bible??? Don’t they realize they are following Bible prophecy to the letter? The perverts are winning all these little battles, but they lose the war. I know how this ends, I read the end of the Book. We have to keep fighting....but it’s going to get worse....before it gets better....
Everyone seems to forget that Kim Davis is a Democratic Party member and elected official.
Time after time, Obama didn’t not enforce laws he didn’t like. How can this lady be punished for the same thing that Obama has done many times?
And the police wonder why we hate them. (Who arrested her? Who is keeping her behind bars? It sure as hell isn't the judge!) Were the police only following orders? How did that excuse work for some others?
Thank you, Liberty Counsel
In a nutshell, what is happening is that she asked that her name be removed from the marriage licenses being issued. She does not want her name to be associated with this perversion. Essentially, the court is imprisoning her to force her to issue these licenses with her name on them. No other options allowed.
The picture of her walking with her hands in cuffs and legs shackled in chains was very touching. They want to humiliate her. I know is was probably embarrassed to show the cuffs, but she probably should have walked with the cuffs and the leg irons exposed for the whole world to see in this case. THEY ARE A BADGE OF HONOR!!!
Back in 1776, Continental President Rutledge ordered the King’s appointed governor of South Carolina to leave the state or die. He fled to an armed British slope sitting in Charleston Harbor. Rutledge appointed Col. Moultrie to set up a defense on Sullivan Island against the British armada. Long story short, the British Navy got its butt kicked.
It’s way past time for conservatives today to spend their fortunes, honor and time to kick ass against the criminal fascist syndicate occupying Washington.
Why arent all the civil servants/public officials who deliberately disobey federal laws by having sanctuary cities in jail too?
Because—Rules are only for conservatives and Christians, liberals can do anything they want.
This is just the beginning. Like Fort Sumter.
Christians, put on your battle armor!
I hope that we have finally reached the turning point and that the pendulum will start to swing the other way.
May God bless you for standing up to support this victim of demonic persecution and and judicial tyranny. I think too many conservatives do not see where this is heading.
“Our form of government will not survive unless we, as a society, agree to respect the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions, regardless of our personal opinions,” Bunning wrote last month in his decision ordering Davis to begin issuing marriage licenses. “Davis is certainly free to disagree with the court’s opinion, as many Americans likely do, but that does not excuse her from complying with it. To hold otherwise would set a dangerous precedent.”