[robowombat]

What good is closing the border if we get jihadis parachuted in with US government blessings.

[boycott]

Why don’t these 65,000 Syrians go back and fight for their nation?

[LambSlave]

Zero is a nice round number.

[refermech]

Not a single muslim should be admitted.

[x1stcav]

Eight Syrians is too many.

Muslims! Stay home.

[RginTN]

These refugees would fit in better in Saudi Arabia, Qutar and other arab countries where there is no IS conflict

[Twotone]

How many is Saudi Arabia taking?

[BenLurkin]

The civilized world has a moral duty to turn back barbarian migrations.

These are not refugees — they are invaders.

[Lera]

“The International Rescue Committee (IRC) headed by a Brit—David Miliband the former British Foreign Secretary—restates its demand that Obama admit 65,000 mostly Muslim Syrians to the US ASAP. “

HELL NO

[GeronL]

How much does that guy get paid by Obama to do this

[Menehune56]

We don’t want them. We will refuse to take them.

[GenXteacher]

Even one piece of trash that thinks Mohammed was a prophet is too many.

[Mr Apple]

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) headed by a Brit—David Miliband the former British Foreign Secretary—restates its demand that Obama admit 65,000 mostly Muslim Syrians to the US ASAP.

From one insane news thread to another today
***k*** David Miliband.
Robe wearing Mullah Obama go back to Muslimville!

[faithhopecharity]

Let the Islamics resettle in other Islamic countries.
They got 57 of them already (and very soon, Europe too)

[R_Kangel]

..... There are now enough foreign Trojan horse operations allowed and installed in the United States to take her down before we even know what’s happening .... courtesy of the foreign controlled Obama Administration and the traitorous GOPe who should know better. .

[utax]

70% of UN “refugees” are coming to the US.

[Fungi]

My heart weeps and I pray for these people, desperate people in need. Tell me why Jordon, Saudi Arabia, the UEA, Dubai, Morocco, and other middle eastern states don't take these people in. Why do not the the countries closet to ISIS make an assault on this evil enterprise? Why does the US have to accept these refugees and ergo bring the problem to our shores? For the same reason that “Palestinian refugee” camps spread across the middle east in Arab countries have had the same problem for generations. The problem is the “religion” of Islam.
The sooner these countries get over this idol worship of a false god based in a black rock in Mecca, the sooner the problem will go away. Unfortunately it will not happen. Saudi Arabia has enough land to make a new country. Call it "Refugee Land," and with all the resources of the country, it could work. But it will not as the House of Saud is already bribing their population to keep them from rebelling. Again the problem is a false religion based on an epileptic, rapist, murderer, and child molester. "

[familyop]

"The International Rescue Committee (IRC) headed by a Brit—David Miliband the former British Foreign Secretary—restates its demand that Obama admit 65,000 mostly Muslim Syrians to the US ASAP."

Lawrence of Arabia again commands the U.S.A. to take them. Give them all jobs in the City, in London, let them live in the upscale countryside.

[Dogbert41]

These are the people, the very people, that orchestrated Arab Spring and F*cked up the entire regions from North Africa to Pakistan.

Not only HELL NO, but carve a cross on their heads and dumb them in the Euphrates. (Clintons, Soros, Powers, etc..)

Just galls me these anti-Christ freaks can walk free with all the blood on their hands.

[virgil]

One more thing that will be rammed down our throats. We won’t have anything to say about it.