To: Hojczyk
So what was held over the heads of the Congress to change the law from being two thirds to pass instead of two thirds to prevent?
Something disturbing happened here.
3 posted on
09/02/2015 8:59:37 AM PDT by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women)
To: A CA Guy
the GOPE wanted to ensure it passed and did not want the constitutional protections to hinder their personal power.
5 posted on
09/02/2015 9:00:56 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: A CA Guy
It’s the Chicago way. Bribery or coercion. Both work.
To: A CA Guy
Yes, extremely disturbing.
7 posted on
09/02/2015 9:01:55 AM PDT by
ColdOne
(I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 HillaryForPrison2016)
To: A CA Guy
So what was held over the heads of the Congress to change the law from being two thirds to pass instead of two thirds to prevent? Something disturbing happened here.
Yes!!!
Question should be asked over and over again until the answer is revealed.
Why would a Republican-controlled Senate give up some of its constitutional power to this out-of-control president?
Nobody appears to be asking. Nobody!
35 posted on
09/02/2015 9:44:30 AM PDT by
JohnG45
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson