Posted on 09/01/2015 5:22:31 PM PDT by markomalley
Another Muslim workplace lawsuit from CAIR in order to impose Islam on the workplace. This is what they do.
A Muslim flight attendant has filed a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), claiming she was suspended from her job for not serving alcohol.
Why would a devout Muslim want to be a flight attendant when half your job is serving alcohol?
This is just like the devout Muslim who sued soft porn retailer Abercrombie and Fitch because she wanted to wear the hijab.
The EEOC is suing Star Transport for rightfully terminating two Muslims who refused to do their job. If these Muslim truck drivers don’t want to deliver alcohol, then they shouldn’t have taken a job in which part of their duties would be to deliver alcohol. It’s that simple.
But no, Islamic supremacists chip, chip, chip away at the establishment clause, and in doing so, impose Islam on the secular marketplace. Muslim lawsuits against Hertz, Wal-Mart, Target, Disney and a host of other American businesses for special rights, special accommodation have been largely successful creating a special rights for a special class of people — which is an accordance with Islam (in which Muslims are superior to the kuffar). But it goes against every American tenet of individual rights and separation of mosque and state. Someone ought to remind the EEOC that their name is Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Equal as in no special rights for any particular class.
Read the chapter, “Mosqueing the Workplace” in my book, Stop the Islamization of America, to better understand this de facto imposition of sharia in America.
Every accommodation gives way to more demands. Everywhere American mores conflict with sharia, it is our mores that must give way.
“Muslim Civil Liberties Group Claims Airline Violated Flight Attendant’s Constitutional Rights,” Detroit.CBSlocal.com:
FARMINGTON HILLS (WWJ) – A Muslim flight attendant has filed a complaint with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEO) claiming she was suspended from her job for not serving alcohol — which is against her religious beliefs.
Lena Masri, an attorney for the Council of American Islamic Relations Michigan (CAIR), says Charee Stanley followed management’s directions, working out an arrangement with her coworkers to accommodate passenger requests for alcohol.
Actually, KY law hasn’t changed.
Here’s a clue. Employers have the right to make job changes. Employees can carry out the changes or ge fired. No job must be set in concrete and stay the same as when you hire in or employers would wait 40 years in some cases to name changes.
When a court issues case law the employer must carry it out and the employees follow suit.
Lot’s of work there. Thank you.
Hint: copy and save it to your “personal” or biography tab on FreeRepublic. Then it will be available to anybody clicking on your login_id here.
> She refused to carry out her duties AS SPECIFIED WHEN SHE TOOK THE JOB.
If she were really that serious about her religion she would never have taken the job
just like:
A preacher would never take a job working as a porn star
A fat slob would never take a job as a model
A bricklayer would never take a job being a manicurist
I think she’s a professional Taqiyyan lyin victim
Here’s another clue.
I was responding to a question on what the difference was. And there is a difference. I didn’t argue that jobs don’t change. I didn’t argue that employers can’t get rid of employees if they don’t change when the job changes.
I simply stated a fact.
Ask her to serve drinks at a gay couple’s ‘wedding’. That ought to make the Obamunists heads wobble.
I’ve heard that there are actual Middle Eastern airlines that keep the liquor locked up until the aircraft leaves Arab airspace, then the headscarves come off and the booze starts flowing. Meanwhile there’s a low-level jihad under way to get Americans to cater to all things muslim. Disgusting!!!
There is a second key difference. The clerk was ELECTED, not hired.
Isn’t it funny how muslims can get away with this kind of stuff....
....but a clerk in Kentucky can go to jail for not issuing a marriage license to gay people because it goes against her religion
...but a photographer can’t refuse a gay wedding, because it goes against his religion
...but a baker can’t refuse a gay wedding cake, because it goes against her religion
If businesses can be sued for violating a muslim’s refusal to do a certain aspect of the job, because it goes against their religion...
Why is it even possible for someone to hire/employ a contractor and then turn around and sue them for refusing to violate their religion?
An employer would be nuts to hire a Muslim unless forced to do so by an over-bearing Big Government mandate.
“In other words it wasn’t what she signed up for.
When the stewardess took the job, it was an expected part of the job from the start. It is what she signed up for and is now balking after the fact.”
Your statements are conclusions drawn without evidence. You don’t know what people “signed up for.” These are not facts. They are your subjective opinions.
Right...
Good point.
It was in the job description
She refused to carry out her duties as a airline stewardess. Fire her.
This is where we are in a pickle. We are happy about a Christian not doing her duties, but yet not support this woman? Something is going to have to be done in Congress to fix this potential mess.
let’s watch the Totalitarians try to MAKE her serve alcohol.
No they fired her. Rightfully so.
the motive mkes all the difference
Both switched to their new religion after they started the job. All I want is for a consensus on who can and who can’t get paid for doing nothing. I guess I am jealous because I don’t have that deal. We cannot have everyone saying that they refuse to work because they don’t agree with things. Can librarians stop working because pro-choice books are rented out? Can I have time off for holy days of obligation since Muslims are getting 6 breaks a day so they can pray to Mecca? There are so many examples of various jobs that are not going to allow for pure principles. It just won’t happen. Should we even accept a paycheck from someone who believes in abortion? It can get pretty sticky real fast.
Refusing to serve alcohol is a lot different than signing off on two homosexuals getting married if your beliefs identify it and all that goes with it as an abomination. Of course if you’re a leftist there are is no right or wrong except what you define it as and it becomes moral relativism. There are reasons for absolutes, truth and lies, good and evil, true false, etc...lines have to be drawn somewhere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.