[MaxMax]

Stewart has nothing to lose by being a complete ass or prick
with his sarcastic smirk. He was born into the 1% and could care
less about anybody he could destroy. This is what they want,
they want his smirk and sarcasm.

Can we get Mark Levin for their debate then? I actually don't think
they'll have a debate so they want to ruin ours to pass the time.

[rockrr]

I don’t care what they do as long as they keep him away from normal people.

[OldSmaj]

Yeah, well a bunch of birkenstock wearing dim witted idiots would settle for a damned comedy fiasco, but serious folks prefer a more dignified conduct for a debate.

Suck a lemon, Stewart.

[vmivol00]

Idiocracy....the most prophetic movie of our time.

[Snickering Hound]

No problem if Mark Levin does the other.

[grey_whiskers]

If he tries snarking at Carson or Cruz, (hmm, or Carly), he's toast.

If he tries it with Trump, one of Trump's bodyguards will jump up on the stage and Taser him unconscious, right on the spot. /sarc> Actually, I know a sure-fire way for Trump to shut Stewart's ass up, even more effectively than Megyn "Warrior Princess" Kelly, but I don't want to give Stewart any warning or chance to prepare.

[Mr. N. Wolfe]

These debates are all about the networks and the moderators and neither of them care about the candidates or the voters.

[GOPJ]

We should ask Rush Limbaugh and Hannity to do our debates...

[oldbrowser]

Maybe Rush is available.

[justa-hairyape]

How about replacing these stupid hosts with serious questions submitted and read by the American people. We are the ones having to live in this mess of a world the political elites have created. They all live behind walls and gated communities. Also, maybe the candidates can ask each other questions. Much better than Jebba the Hut whoring out some Fox bimbo.

[Nachum]

[Vinnie]

If he’s moderator the repubs should refuse to attend.
Simply, ‘Thanks but no thanks’