Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catsrus

Understood and agree from the aesthetics point of view. But to be ‘staged?’ Frankly, I’d fire the image maker that approved that shot. It is pathetic.


20 posted on 08/22/2015 7:50:42 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Gaffer

I would too. Their clothes match the scenery so well, I could barely make them out from the background. It is eerie!


33 posted on 08/22/2015 7:57:55 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Gaffer

Staged? Of course it is. Go to the Daily Mail site snd look at the aerial photos. There is no public access to the private beach. Just as with the dancing in swimsuits staged photos, the photographer was positioned far enough away for the pretend paparazzi shoot.

Do you really believe the Clinton’s SS protective detail allows strangers within the distance shown? It’s like a carnival shooting gallery, two old slow people on a long narrow wooden walkway with no cover. Ducks moving back and forth for the rubes.


86 posted on 08/22/2015 8:54:30 AM PDT by Covenantor ("Men are ruled-...by liars who refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern." Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson