Skip to comments.
Breaking: Trump Likely to be Banned from Future Republican Debates
The Political Insider ^
| August 21, 2015
| TPI Staff Writer
Posted on 08/21/2015 5:46:59 PM PDT by Din Maker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-146 next last
To: Din Maker
absolute BS article; not a single fact to support their three paragraph BS assertion.
61
posted on
08/21/2015 6:18:59 PM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: Leaning Right
“They have no courage, for good or for evil.”
Ask McDaniel in Mississippi about that.
62
posted on
08/21/2015 6:19:14 PM PDT
by
Luke21
(Go Ted go.)
To: Din Maker
I remember back in High School Civics classes learning how our Nation had a more open elective process then say the Soviet Union. There they put up one name and the voter went to the polls and said Yes.
Then they gave us Gerald Ford, Bob Dole, John McCain, Mitt Romney, so when the process was telling us that Jeb Bush was a given, why shouldn’t we shout for joy that Donald Trump is thumbing his nose at the establishment process.
Really, John McCain was the best you could do that year. No way, Jose!
63
posted on
08/21/2015 6:19:18 PM PDT
by
Dustoff45
(A good woman brings out the best in a good man! A better woman might be just what this nation needs)
To: HerrBlucher
This is really getting funny. The GOPe deserves every bit of scorn and ridicule that is come its way. No kidding.
64
posted on
08/21/2015 6:19:38 PM PDT
by
ought-six
(Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: Din Maker
F* the debates.
Trump doesn’t need them.
65
posted on
08/21/2015 6:20:15 PM PDT
by
samtheman
(2014: Voters elect Repubs to congress... 2015: Repubs defund NOTHING... 2016: Trump/Cruz)
To: Din Maker
A middle finger salute to the GOP chair, Rove & the cast of clowns in the establishment GOP if Trump is ignored. We won’t forget in Nov of ‘16.
To: Din Maker
67
posted on
08/21/2015 6:22:16 PM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(You walk into the room like a camel and then you frown)
To: upsdriver
68
posted on
08/21/2015 6:24:21 PM PDT
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: The Antiyuppie
69
posted on
08/21/2015 6:25:21 PM PDT
by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: COBOL2Java
Been saying that for YEARS.
The only thing the RNC wants is controllable pussies who can be told what to do by the C of C and their big donors.
70
posted on
08/21/2015 6:26:42 PM PDT
by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
To: All
Trump will just hold Town Hall style events opposite of the GOP debates.
Who do you think the media will cover based on the 40,000 we saw turn out tonight to hear and see Trump?
I don’t think even Ted Cruz could get that kind of turnout in TX
71
posted on
08/21/2015 6:27:50 PM PDT
by
Rodney Dangerfield
(I stopped drinking the Trump Kool-Aid July 25th and will support Ted Cruz for POTUS)
To: Rodney Dangerfield
Speaking of Cruz, I wonder how many Republicans will boycott the debates if Trump is banned?
72
posted on
08/21/2015 6:29:10 PM PDT
by
Rodney Dangerfield
(I stopped drinking the Trump Kool-Aid July 25th and will support Ted Cruz for POTUS)
To: Bringbackthedraft
Normally people would call what the RNC is doing a “circle jerk”, I usually refer to it as a circular firing squad.
73
posted on
08/21/2015 6:30:41 PM PDT
by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
To: cuban leaf
“This will cost them and the Donald just may win as an independent.”
Even if he didn’t debate, he could win the primaries in the states and become the GOP candidate that way, couldn’t he? Of course, the RNC could get very nasty and go to each state and use thuggery to keep Trump’s name off the ballots. And, even if he did win enough states’ primaries, could the RNC pull something at the convention and nominate someone else by another means?
To: Din Maker
What a mistake that would be.
To: Din Maker
Not if enough people stand up and demand differently!
76
posted on
08/21/2015 6:32:55 PM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
To: rikkir
Yes, and there will be so many more!
77
posted on
08/21/2015 6:33:45 PM PDT
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
To: cornfedcowboy
WHY? We all knew that they would throw him out as soon as they could for their pre-selected candidate, GIBBERING JEB.
So that question should never even been asked, it was asked for just this purpose.
78
posted on
08/21/2015 6:33:55 PM PDT
by
5th MEB
(Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
To: Din Maker
He should have his own debate/infomercial while those debates are on!
79
posted on
08/21/2015 6:36:36 PM PDT
by
hsmomx3
(GO STEELERS!!!!!!)
To: Din Maker
Yes, to them party loyalty is more important than loyalty to the country.
80
posted on
08/21/2015 6:38:02 PM PDT
by
Aria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-146 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
![](http://i.imgur.com/zAHSvTH.jpg"; "”source:")