Posted on 08/05/2015 8:53:28 AM PDT by rktman
Secretary of State John Kerry gave an interview to Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic in which he warned Congress that if it rejected the Iran deal, it would “screw” the Iranian regime, and the Ayatollahs would not come back to the table.
“[T]he United States Congress will prove the ayatollah’s suspicion, and there’s no way he’s ever coming back. He will not come back to negotiate. Out of dignity, out of a suspicion that you can’t trust America. America is not going to negotiate in good faith. It didn’t negotiate in good faith now, would be his point,” Kerry said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Heinz-Kerry has always protected Islamic terrorists.
Before 911.
Before Boston.
Always.
"I want the people to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain't bad."
And he fought for the rights of the of the downtrodden VC/NVA once upon a time too. “I fought against them(?) before I fought for them.”
Quisling. “Vietnam Vets Against The War” KGB stooge.
Won’t come back to the table.
Good.
We should be telling them to knock it off. Period.
Not finding ways to make ourselves more vulnerable by treaty.
We are an elected republic with three co-equal branches of government. If some raghead is that stupid to not know that, then yes, Kerry and Obama were negotiating in bad faith.
Maybe if the table has a big old roast pig wrapped in bacon? Oh, wait is that redundant? :>}
American liberals, like Obama, Hillary, Kerry, Schumer, Durbin, etc., seem to forget or not care which country they are supposed to represent and protect.
They work very hard to makes sure the USA always gets the worse end of any deal.
” ...elected republic with three co-equal branches of government.” Well, that’s what was intended but has been reduced to just one branch for efficiency sake. That being the offal office where the lyin’ king “do as he please.”
Kinda LOL! If anybody’s getting screwed on this deal, it’s the free world. Would you trust these assclowns?
So Iran repeatedly violates past negotiations and proved themselves untrustworthy.
And now they claim that the US will be viewed as untrustworthy if the president negotiates a deal that he doesn’t have the power to ratify himself, and Congress won’t approve it.
We don’t have a deal unless and until Congress approves it. And congress sent Iran a letter explaining that process months ago, for which Obama and the media rebuked Congress for overcommunicating.
So Iran repeatedly violates past negotiations and proved themselves untrustworthy.
And now they claim that the US will be viewed as untrustworthy if the president negotiates a deal that he doesn’t have the power to ratify himself, and Congress won’t approve it.
We don’t have a deal unless and until Congress approves it. And congress sent Iran a letter explaining that process months ago, for which Obama and the media rebuked Congress for overcommunicating.
Didn’t they get the letter from Tom Cotton?
He has a raghead son-in-law.
Nope. Not redundant. http://www.saloononcalhoun.com/images/pig_roast_in_bacon_blanket.jpg
Obama and Kerry should have had house and senate intelligence and foreign affairs committee staffers present at all negotiations in Iran. That's how our government works. I really don't care what the ayatollahs thought they were buying or selling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
