Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran: U.S. Banned from Knowing Details of Iran Nuclear Inspection Agreement
Free Beacon ^ | Adam Kredo

Posted on 08/03/2015 5:11:58 PM PDT by Whenifhow

Iran’s ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said the nuclear inspection organization is barred from revealing to the United States any details of deals it has inked with Tehran to inspect its contested nuclear program going forward, according to regional reports.

Recent disclosures by Iran indicate that the recently inked nuclear accord includes a series of side deals on critical inspections regimes that are neither public nor subject to review by the United States.

Reza Najafi, Iran’s ambassador and permanent envoy to the IAEA, stated over the weekend that no country is permitted to know the details of future inspections conducted by the IAEA. In addition, no U.S. inspectors will be permitted to enter Iran’s nuclear sites.

“The provisions of a deal to which the IAEA and a second country are parties are confidential and should not be divulged to any third country, and as Mr. Kerry discussed it in the Congress, even the U.S. government had not been informed about the deal between IAEA and Iran,” Najafi was quotedas saying by Iran’s Mehr News Agency.

snip

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kansas) and at least 35 other lawmakers are circulating a letter to Obama to provide Congress the text of these agreements as is required under U.S. law.

snip

Secretary of State John Kerry has personally “stated he has not seen these agreements and the Administration failed to submit these agreements as part of the JPCOA,” the email states.

Under the terms of a bill meant to give Congress a final say over the deal, the Obama administration is required to provide text of all agreements, the lawmakers write to Obama.

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: chuckschumer; deal; eliotengel; fatah; finalirandeal; gaza; hamas; iran; iraniannukes; iransidedeals; israel; kerry; lebanon; newyork; nuke; steveisrael; upchuckschumer; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: ArmstedFragg

This was designed so that the US would be complicit to terrorism.


21 posted on 08/03/2015 6:33:14 PM PDT by ully2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ully2
This was designed so that the US would be complicit to terrorism.

But still have culpable deniability.

22 posted on 08/03/2015 6:35:15 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

ping


23 posted on 08/03/2015 6:46:38 PM PDT by GOPJ (It takes a village of aborted dead babies to buy a Lamborghini - freeperblackdog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

The Deal? You have to get nuked to find out what’s in it. - Hanoi Boi.


24 posted on 08/03/2015 7:53:13 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (The trouble with America is that it's full of Americans. - King Obonzo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

Israel won’t fall, don’t concern yourself with that. Concern yourself with fixing the country.


25 posted on 08/03/2015 9:44:16 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

So we lost the war and surrendered ?


26 posted on 08/03/2015 11:25:30 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I think they want to go down in history as having made the first Black American president look like a fool.
********************
They shouldn’t have wasted any effort. Obama has accomplished that all by himself.


27 posted on 08/04/2015 12:34:07 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
TREASONOUS RAINBOW HUT OCCUPANT needs to be IMPEACHED and yet we have NO opposition party left in America.


28 posted on 08/04/2015 7:39:13 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
When they should say “No!” Congress grovels before Obama.

The Crying Cheeto



ALL HAIL THE KING OF THE WHIGS




29 posted on 08/04/2015 7:44:51 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Obama has already done his job for them. Sanctions are off, Congress is largely irrelevant, why not make Obama and by extension the US look the fool.


30 posted on 08/04/2015 12:49:58 PM PDT by SJackson (C Matthews: should NY State recognize gay marriage? Sen Clinton: "No!" The crowd booed, 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Why not make Obama look the fool?

Well, it may stiffen the spine of Congress (unlikely).

It may make the election of Hillary, Biden, or Kerry less likely, and the election of someone like Trump or Cruz more likely.

It’s like counting your chips while sitting at the table. It might be fun to rub it in, but it can be counter productive later.


31 posted on 08/04/2015 12:58:42 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Not suggesting it’s a smart move on Iran’s part. There are things the US could do, and Obama’s only around for another year and a half. Could clearly be counter productive with a Republican President. I think they’re enjoying their victory. And who knows what their plans are for the next 18 months. They could well have a bomb by inauguration day, there’s no one to stop them. Which could have all kinds of ramifications. It’s probably a mistake to view them as rational actors, who I agree would bank their victory and quietly make the most of it the next few years. With some nice words for Obama, costs nothing. Clearly that’s not their plan, in many ways their incitement goes on unchanged. Rational in a western context, if you’re a twelver like most of the Mullahs you’re operating under a different set of rules.


32 posted on 08/04/2015 1:05:30 PM PDT by SJackson (C Matthews: should NY State recognize gay marriage? Sen Clinton: "No!" The crowd booed, 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If you’re a twelver...

Anything to make the Mahdi come up out of that well.

The thing is, you’d think that Obama would have enough advisers with familiarity with these goons to tell him if they are crazy or crazy like foxes. And what about the rest of the signatories? I know profit drives them, but an irrational actor with a bomb is a problem for them too. Consider the fallout if things so awry.


33 posted on 08/04/2015 1:08:33 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Thanks GOPJ.

34 posted on 08/04/2015 1:11:36 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

You’d think the Euros would have some concerns, but they’re not looking past the next deal. Iran’s not a threat to China, probably afraid of Putin. A life or death conflict between Iran and Israel/Sunnis with the real potential to go nuclear, Europe will pine for the days when their only economic concern was Greece. And then there’s their local Muslim populations.


35 posted on 08/04/2015 1:16:23 PM PDT by SJackson (C Matthews: should NY State recognize gay marriage? Sen Clinton: "No!" The crowd booed, 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Exactly.

PS/Off topic: Thanks for maintaining your ping list


36 posted on 08/04/2015 1:23:31 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

It’s hard, mostly cause I find little time to comment.


37 posted on 08/04/2015 6:14:47 PM PDT by SJackson (C Matthews: should NY State recognize gay marriage? Sen Clinton: "No!" The crowd booed, 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

38 posted on 08/05/2015 5:02:41 AM PDT by SJackson (C Matthews: should NY State recognize gay marriage? Sen Clinton: "No!" The crowd booed, 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Because they are a terrorist state and Obama/Democrats want Israel nuked
and wiped off the planet. I expect Israel to act very soon.
39 posted on 08/05/2015 5:06:34 AM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I enjoy reading your comments.


40 posted on 08/05/2015 11:58:00 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson