Replies

Proverbs 4:16 For they sleep not, except they have done mischief; and their sleep is taken away, unless they cause some to fall. 17 For they eat the bread of wickedness, and drink the wine of violence. 18 But the path of the just is as the shining light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day.

Jesus said that one of the sure signs of His return would be legislated homosexuality, like the days of Sodom. The Word of God pulls the facade off the PC face of homosexuality. In 1 Cor 6:9, Homosexuals are called "offenders". In Genesis 19 & Judges 19 it shows the predatory nature of the activity. Leviticus calls Homosexuality an abomination to God. Indeed, even statistics expose that homosexuality is not about monogamy and relationship, for the average number of partners homosexuals females have is in the hundreds, and for men, the thousands!

Historically, the true nature of Sodomy is aggressive, militant, and predatory. Now that their delusion is mainstream, they are aggressively coming out. In the late 1970s, Sodomites were struck with AIDS (formerly Gay Man's Plague). Yet even with the specter of this dreaded disease, it has not stopped their behavior. They continue to reach for the doors of our schools, our businesses, our legal institutions, and our churches.

Hear the words of Jack Cashill's warning. Pray that God will raise up men and women to faithfully stand against this abomination and protect our children until the day Jesus Christ returns in Glory to judge the quick and the dead...

Luke 17:28 Likewise also as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded; 29 But the same day that Lot went out of Sodom it rained fire and brimstone from heaven, and destroyed them all. 30 Even thus shall it be in the day when the Son of man is revealed.

That’s EXACTLY what “gay marriage” is all about.

In the late 1970s, Sodomites were struck with AIDS (formerly Gay Man's Plague)

Yes. Even the clinical name was GRID: Gay Related Immune Deficiency.
<
When this hit, many of us thought that homosexuals would become less aggressive. We were wrong. The new battle cry was "AIDS is not my weakness; AIDS is my strength."

Jesus said that one of the sure signs of His return would be legislated homosexuality.

I'd like to find this for our bible study group. Can you please point to the bible reference(s) where Jesus says that.

I am not challenging that he said it, I have just not seen that and would like to share it. Thanks for your help.

True, also so true is that Christianity allows them to get away with it, the question is who is really at fault, a tiny percent of the population pummels the vast majority at every turn.

And the sodomites pounded on Lot’s door, demandingnhe release the male travelers so thatthe enrged crowd could “know” them.

Bake my damn cake and approve of my legal gay wedding, demand the homosexualists.

A dispute that began in 2013 when the ‘Sweet Cakes by Melissa’ bakery in Gresham, Oregon, refused to provide a wedding cake to a same-sex couple has come to an end after the state’s Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) ruled that owners Melissa and Aaron Klein must pay damages totaling $135,000 to complainants Laurel and Rachel Bowman-Cryer. A 2 July 2015 ruling [PDF] issued by the BOLI described the $135,000 as “damages, not fines or civil penalties”:

Under Oregon law, businesses cannot discriminate or refuse service based on sexual orientation, just as they cannot turn customers away because of race, sex, disability, age or religion.

The Oregon Equality Act of 2007 includes an exemption for religious organizations and schools, but does not allow private business owners to deny service and unlawfully discriminate against potential customers.

The BOLI press release reiterated that the damages awarded were neither punitive nor unusual for such claims:

The BOLI Final Order awards $60,000 in damages to Laurel Bowman-Cryer and $75,000 in damages to Rachel Bowman-Cryer for emotional suffering stemming directly from unlawful discrimination. The amounts are damages related to the harm suffered by the Complainants, not fines or civil penalties which are punitive in nature.

The Final Order notes that the non-economic damages are consistent with the agency’s previous orders, such as an earlier ruling against a Bend dentist In the Matter of Andrew W. Engle. In that case, BOLI awarded a Christian employee $325,000 in damages for physical, mental and emotion suffering due to religious discrimination and harassment.

After the press release was distributed, Melissa Klein published a Facebook status update reacting to the ruling and its provisions:

The final ruling has been made today. We have been charged with $135,000 in emotional damages, But also now Aaron has been charged with advertising. (Basically talking about not wanting to participate in a same-sex wedding) This effectively strips us of all our first amendment rights. According to the state of Oregon we neither have freedom of religion or freedom of speech. We will NOT give up this fight, and we will NOT be silenced. We stand for God’s truth, God’s word and freedom for ALL americans. We are here to obey God not man, and we will not conform to this world. If we were to lose everything it would be totally worth it for our Lord who gave his one and only son, Jesus, for us! God will win this fight!

In the ruling, Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian explicitly stated that Oregon laws prohibit refusal of service to protected classes for discriminatory reasons:

This case is not about a wedding cake or a marriage. It is about a business’s refusal to serve someone because of their sexual orientation. Under Oregon law, that is illegal.

Within Oregon’s public accommodations law is the basic principle of human decency that every person, regardless of their sexual orientation, has the freedom to fully participate in society. The ability to enter public places, to shop, to dine, to move about unfettered by bigotry.

The entire 60-page ruling can be read here [PDF], and portions of it pertain to whether the owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa communicated an intent to persist in violating Oregon’s public accommodations law:

The lengthy ruling described incidents wherein the Kleins’ promotion of their plight resulted in negative attention and threats to the Bowman-Cryers, including Klein’s publication of court documents to Facebook that included the couple’s home address. Contrary to many descriptions of the issue, no “gag order” was put in place that prohibits the Kleins from publicizing or talking about their case; however, the Kleins have been ordered to cease proclaiming or offering any public suggestion that they intended to refuse service to same-sex couples in the future

Thank you for referencing that article Jan_Sobieski. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

Christians need to take part of the blame for the government-related attacks on their faith imo.

More specifically, to the best of my knowledge, some Christians will argue that Jesus' teaching of Matthew 22:18-22, “Give to Caesar what is Caesar’s, ..." means that Christians aren’t supposed to get involved in government affairs. This is evidenced by so many “flag, motherhood, and apple pie" patriots who have evidently never been taught about the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers as they should have been.

On the other hand, Acts 22:25-19 shows that Paul sure as heck used his Roman citizenship protections to prevent himself from getting flogged by Roman soldiers.

Regarding Christian business owners who have been harassed and penalized by the state for refusing to provide certain services for gay marriages, I don’t see Christians likewise claiming Section 1 of the 14th Amendment which was written in part to specifically protect the abridgment of constitutionally enumerated protections, 1st Amendment religious freedom of religious expression in these cases, from state action.

14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Since the states have never amended the Constitution to expressly protect gay agenda issues like gay “marriage,” the states that are using constitutionally unprotected pro-gay policies to trump the constitutionally enumerated protection of religious expression have violated Section 1 of the 14th Amendment imo.

Again, since some (many?) Christians evidently don’t know their constitutional protections well enough, possibly as a consequence of the way some Christians are strictly interpreting church and state-related passages in the Bible, Christians are getting walked on by the states.

Marriage is modeled after Christ’s relationship to the Church.

The prince of this world has always coveted that relationship for himself.