Planned Parenthood Goes on Offense as Another Sickening Video Emerges

RUSH: Planned Parenthood. Ma Richards' daughter Cecile Richards, president now of Planned Parenthood, says that all of these videos that have been secretly made and released are "extremist videos" and they're "nothing short of an attack on women." "Planned Parenthood has been a trusted nonprofit provider of women’s health care for nearly a century," and that's the biggest misnomer about Planned Parenthood that it's about healthcare.

This is one of the greatest illustrations of the butchery, if you will, of our culture and the literal attack on words to call what happens in a Planned Parenthood clinic "health"? Whether you preface it by saying women's health or whatever, there's nothing healthy going on in here. "Planned Parenthood has been a trusted nonprofit provider of women’s health care for nearly a century, and each year, 2.7 million people come to our health centers for high-quality, nonjudgmental, compassionate care.

"Since our very beginning, our health centers, providers and patients have come under outrageous attacks, political and otherwise. These attacks are not about us. They are about the ability of women across the country to access health care." See? Abortion has become health care. Abortion. Pregnancy, it's an illness, and Planned Parenthood is there and anybody getting in the way is conducting a "war on women" as an extremist. "[O]ur health centers ... are about the ability of women across the country to access health care. Period. The most recent attacks in this decades-long campaign represent a new low."

So, right, if videos revealing the butchery and organ harvesting at Planned Parenthood are attacks on women, then I don't know what anything means anymore. Planned Parenthood, of course, went out and hired a damage-control PR firm to change the narrative. This article I just read excerpts from was written for Ma Richards daughter by her PR team, and it's deflective damage control.

The next story, Fox News: "Court Bars Anti-Abortion Group From Releasing New Videos of California Company Officials -- A temporary restraining order has been issued preventing an anti-abortion group from releasing any video of leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers." This would be StemExpress. "The group is the same one that previously released three covertly shot videos of a Planned Parenthood leader discussing the sale of aborted fetuses for research.

"The Los Angeles Superior Court order issued Tuesday prohibits the Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video of three high-ranking StemExpress officials taken at a restaurant in May. It appears to be the first legal action prohibiting the release of a video from the organization." So what the organization has done, is they have sent videos to the state of Texas attorney general. I'm convinced this is one of the ways they're trying to fight various biased judges and courts who are going to find in favor of Planned Parenthood and StemExpress.

By the way, little departure here, just to kind of make that point in a different way. In reading about the legal proceedings that are about to happen here in the Tom Brady case... You ought to read the Sports Drive-Bys, writing about this, talking about, "Well, we hope Brady ends up in this court because the judge there has been appointed by Clinton, and that means the judge is going to be more favorable to unions."

And then another story will say, "It really would be hopeful and helpful if the Brady team could get their case heard by judge David Doty in Minnesota because Doty has a history of finding against the NFL. And then we hope he ends up with a good labor judge appointed by a Democrat president in New York if it ends up there." I'm left to ask myself, "Do you mean it matters the political leanings of the judge? I thought it was the law that everybody was concerned with when you got to court." I know. I'm being purposely naive here to illustrate a point. I know. I know. Everybody judge shops and court shops. But it just illustrates that the law is secondary to the personal political policy preferences of the judges.

RUSH: I don't think that ban on the videos of Planned Parenthood in California is too effective, because another video has been released, and we have the audio. A couple of sound bites of the audio, coming up here in just a second. A fourth video was released today. But it doesn't seem to involve any StemExpress people. They're the ones who got the temporary restraining order from the court out in California. But, folks, this is getting, literally... It started sick and depraved, and now we have "Planned Parenthood Plots Sale of Legally Alive Fetuses."

I don't know what the website for this is. Oh, Cybercast News Service. Just pathetic. And there's this. This has got some people... I got some e-mails about this last night, people asking me to explain something to them. This is a story from TheHill.com and the headline, "63% Oppose Defunding Planned Parenthood." The people that had heard this and were asked about it said (paraphrasing), "Rush, I don't understand this. I don't understand it.

"Because every piece of polling data I've seen shows people just outraged and shocked over what's happening at Planned Parenthood. The harvesting of baby organs for sale. I mean, there isn't any poll that shows majority support for that. Tell me, Rush, how can 63% oppose defunding Planned Parenthood."

Folks, I don't think it's hard to explain this. Remember, now, who are we talking about? Who gets polled? Low-information voters. A cross-section of the American people. What do you think most people think Planned Parenthood is? Do you think most people realize that it's a series of abortion clinics?" I would submit to you that most people look at Planned Parenthood and they see Planned Parenthood.

I would venture to say that a lot of people look at it and think that it is a place you go where you want to talk to experts about how to plan your family, and they will advise you how many kids to have, what it's going to cost you. That's what I think most people think Planned Parenthood is. It says "Planned Parenthood" over the door, doesn't it? It doesn't say, "We do abortions here and harvest the organs for sale!" It says "Planned Parenthood."

You couple that with all the news that has been out for decades about how Planned Parenthood is all about "women's health," and what do you think most people think it is? A place to go plan your family when you need some help. They probably think it's a great service! "What's wrong with planning your family? Most people should do that," a lot of people think. I think there's a disconnect. It's about words, and more than words it's about how long the words have been in the popular vernacular.

The left does this on purpose. They never title organizations they establish truthfully and honestly, just like Obama never told anybody the truth about what Obamacare was going to be. What did he say it was going to be? "You like your doctor? Keep your doctor! You like your insurance plan? Keep your plan! Your premium is going to come down $2,500 a month. We're going to give everybody health care! We're going to have everybody insured and we're going to reduce the deficit. Yea, yea!"

The Republicans come along and want to oppose that? "You mean people! Why are you against everybody having health care," they asked the Republicans. "Why are you against premiums coming down? Why? Why? Why are you so mean?" "Well, the president is lying." "Well, no! The president said what he said," and then they roll it out and the website doesn't work, and it's all falling apart now. But it's already been established that the intentions are really cool.

Planned Parenthood has been around for decades, folks, and the news about what happens in there, graphically, is literally less than two weeks old. I don't care what it is, there's no two-week-old news story that's going to counter decades of public perception of Planned Parenthood being a wholesome organization that helps people plan their families. For example, tell them how many kids they should have before they can't afford anymore, and how to plan for it and how to pay for it.

Most people think it is. It's been a very, very brilliant deceptive trick foisted on the culture. If people actually knew who Margaret Sanger was and what the real reason for Planned Parenthood was -- if you told them two-thirds of these Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are in black neighborhoods -- well, then you might understand. But nobody has done that with any consistency for long enough to counter the decades-old impression of what Planned Parenthood -- "Who could oppose that?" -- is.

I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.

You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died.

(http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)

But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,

and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)

What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing

of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans. Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.

Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.

I hear that by now, somewhere around 57 MILLION of them have perished.

Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and

retirement?

Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens. Perhaps they'll come to their senses

before they are ALL dead!

Somebody needs to expose Boehner’s Chief Policy Advisor who is connected to this evil mess. Charlotte Spears Ivanic, who in her role as Chief Policy Advisor to Boehner, also advises him on health policy, is sister to the StemExpress owner, Cate Spears Dyer.

Linkedin profile of Cate Dyer, CEO of Stemexpress—company that purchases fetal organs from PP:

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/cate-dyer/27/592/857

Here is the money question who are the ones profiting from the sale of the baby parts?

Not PPH, they sell to Stem Express for cheap, something like $30-$40 per part. Stem Express, whose founder/CEO’s sister works for Boenher, sells those parts for $3,000.00 - $4,000.00 each.

Nice profit.

So my question is who are the owners/stockholders of Stem Express? Are they members of the US Congress? Or the execs of PPH, just who are they?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.