Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran buys 100 Russian refueling aircraft for its air force to reach any point in the Mid East
Debka ^ | July 22, 2015

Posted on 07/22/2015 9:00:06 AM PDT by rickmichaels

In defiance of the international arms embargo, Iran last week placed an order with Moscow for a huge fleet of 100 Russian IL78 MKI tanker aircraft (NATO: Midas) for refueling its air force in mid-flight, thereby extending its range to 7,300 km. This is reported exclusively by DEBKAfile from its military and intelligence sources. The transaction runs contrary to the terms of the nuclear accord the six world powers and Iran signed in Vienna earlier this month.

These tanker planes can simultaneously refuel six to eight warplanes. Their acquisition brings Israel, 1.200km away – as well the rest of the Middle East - within easy range of Iranian aerial bombardment. It also puts Iran’s air force ahead of Israel’s in terms of the quantity and range of its refueling capacity.

Whereas opponents of the Vienna deal have warned that Tehran will spend the billions of dollars released by sanctions relief as a bonanza for fueling its campaigns of terror in the region, it turns out that Iran’s first post-accord purchase is a heavy investment in the rearmament and upgrade of its armed forces’ aggressive capabilities.

The Israeli air force is familiar with the Russian airborne tanker from its use by the Indian air force with which Israel has close ties of cooperation. Its military engineers have also upgraded the Russian fuel tankers in service with the Uzbekistan air force.

Tuesday, July 21, DEBKAfile uncovered some of the tactics and escape clauses Iran has had built into its nuclear accord with the world powers for circumventing its provisions and commitments. The purchase of Russian refueling craft is a concrete example of this kind of evasion. Because the accord confirms the arms embargo in force until 2020, both Moscow and Tehran can maintain that the Russian aircraft industry will not be able to produce 100 new planes before the five years are up, and so the transaction is not a violation.

The huge Iranian-Russian military transaction therefore stands as the first palpable test of the Vienna accord, depending on whether US President Barack Obama or his Secretary of State John Kerry decides to make an issue of it. If they just let it go, it will set a precedent for the arms embargo clause of the nuclear accord to start unraveling.

Also Tuesday, Kerry gave an interview to the Al Arabia TV to prepare the way for his mission to the Gulf region on Aug. 3, which is to ease its rulers’ extreme unease over the ramifications of the nuclear accord. He asserted strongly to the interviewer: “I am not going to go through in great detail all the ways in which this agreement, in fact, makes the Gulf States and the region safer.”

The Secretary of State can expect some really hard questions during his trip on exactly how the Vienna accord makes the region safer, when Iran’s first act after signing is to arm itself with a fleet of Russian in-flight fuel tankers to expand and strengthen its range and power for aerial aggression.


TOPICS: Germany; Israel; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: crimea; debka; debkafile; donetsk; europeanunion; finalirandeal; france; iran; iranrenigs; iransanctions; israel; kerryfool; lebanon; nato; obamairan; putinsbuttboys; refuelingplanes; russia; tankerplanes; ukraine; unitedkingdom; vladtheimploder; waronterror; worldwariii; worldwarthree; wwiii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 07/22/2015 9:00:06 AM PDT by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

This must be one of the side-deals we’re starting to hear about.

The Russians will do almost anything for short term money, followed closely by the French and the Germans, in no particular order.


2 posted on 07/22/2015 9:02:14 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

And any point in Europe.

If Europe isn’t worried, they should be.


3 posted on 07/22/2015 9:08:33 AM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Well this is DEBKA, do we have another independent source?


4 posted on 07/22/2015 9:16:44 AM PDT by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Arming Iran is like giving a loaded gun to a monkey.


5 posted on 07/22/2015 9:16:59 AM PDT by x_plus_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

100 targets.


6 posted on 07/22/2015 9:18:05 AM PDT by Reno89519 (American Lives Matter! US Citizen, Veteran, Conservative, Republican. I vote. Trump 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels
These tanker planes can simultaneously refuel six to eight warplanes.

That's not worded very well...

7 posted on 07/22/2015 9:18:25 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
Il-78MKI

Customized variant of the Il-78ME for the Indian Air Force. These Uzbekistan-built planes are fitted with Israeli fuel transfer systems and can refuel 6-8 Sukhoi Su-30MKIs in one mission.

D'oh!

8 posted on 07/22/2015 9:21:50 AM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Sounds like iran is gearing up for a battle, or a war.

In the mean time, our SoS and CiC have a piece of paper saying that the iranians will play nice.

Where have I seen this scenario play out before?


9 posted on 07/22/2015 9:23:29 AM PDT by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

From what I’m reading in the article, this is not a violation of the arms embargo.


10 posted on 07/22/2015 9:24:33 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

100 Russian Tankers.
100 Iranian Pilots.

The ground just resigned!


11 posted on 07/22/2015 9:24:34 AM PDT by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Pfffftttt! What Air Force?


12 posted on 07/22/2015 9:26:22 AM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

I can’t imagine what payload the Iranians would have in mind to be worth carrying such a long way....


13 posted on 07/22/2015 9:27:43 AM PDT by henkster (Where'd my tagline go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Neville Chamberlain was a mere amateur appeaser, compared to Obola.
We are giving / releasing $150,000,000,000 to Iran, so they can arm themselves with the best weapons technology.
You’d think with such a favorable development they’d be a bit more gracious, and wouldn’t continue all of the “Death to America” threats.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/07/obamas_deal_150_billion_to_iran_to_destroy_israel_with_conventional_arms.html

We’re Effed


14 posted on 07/22/2015 9:28:16 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels
...when Iran’s first act after signing is to arm itself with a fleet of Russian in-flight fuel tankers to expand and strengthen its range and power for aerial aggression.

This scumbag basta*d kerry isn't going to answer this. He will mumble some kind of incoherent logic and dance around any questions.

15 posted on 07/22/2015 9:30:46 AM PDT by Mr Apple (http://www.angelfire.com/md2/Ldotvets/Bubba_47.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

100 targets.

*****************************************

I was thinking - they have to park them somewhere.


16 posted on 07/22/2015 9:30:49 AM PDT by Qiviut (Stand up for Jesus, ye soldiers of the cross; lift high his royal banner, it must not suffer loss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rickmichaels

Reports by Debka are spotty....just sayin’.


17 posted on 07/22/2015 9:31:52 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: factoryrat

There is a HUGE difference in the agreements then and now.
First, in 1938 there was world wide hope that that paper really meant “Peace in our Time.” Only a few, such as W. Churchill protested and knew what the future would bring.
Today, in 2015, there is world wide knowledge that todays “paper” meant “Catastrophe in our Time.” The CIC and the SOC believe in their paper, while most fearfully see what the future will bring.


18 posted on 07/22/2015 9:32:22 AM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf (N.Y.Times: We print the news as it fits our views)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Yet some folks call Putin the great defender of Christianity.


19 posted on 07/22/2015 9:32:25 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

I know. Just take it for what it is.


20 posted on 07/22/2015 9:36:03 AM PDT by rickmichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson