Posted on 07/21/2015 9:36:26 AM PDT by Ray76
In a second undercover video released on Tuesday by the Center for Medical Progress, a top Planned Parenthood official appears to entertain the idea of violating the protocol which prohibits abortion doctors from altering their methods in order to obtain fetal tissue and organs donated by patients.
In the video, which was filmed in February, Gatter says that she is willing to talk to the surgeon who performs abortions to see if hes willing to use different methods in order to keep tissue and organs intact.
Doing so would appear to violate both federal law and a consent form signed by patients.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Move along. Nothing to see.
It was a deceptively edited video. Yeah, that’s the canned response to use.
Like Ann Barnhardt said, this will just encourage some women to get pregnant so they can cash in on the body part market.
Government funded Mengeles.
Women are going to pay for their *Liberation* in ways they cannot imagine. I am a woman.
I am appauled at most modern woman these days. I sit in an undisclosed location in NY state.
They are the stupidest living things on earth.
Really deserve what they have coming.
In God’s Time.
I suppose that since sex between a man and a woman can occur in only one of the three ways. Consensual, Rape or incest. Therefore outside of the latter two the sex was consensual and both parties involved know it can result in a pregnancy. Knowing this then their decision is “murder” as a form of birth control in lieu any protection or birth control pill.
And knowing this the human chop shop has found a way to take the murdered child, remember that the baby has to be grown in order to harvest any organs, and make a profit from this murder. Nazi Germany would be so proud.
“Do we really have a moral dilemma? In 2014 Marion County Oregon ruled they would not allow burning fetal material in their incinerator. Yet since Roe vs. Wade 56,000,000 abortions generated roughly 3.5 million pounds of this medical waste. Now Planned Parenthood feverishly explains harvesting body parts for scientific experiments. But how is that different from embryonic stem cells research?
These issues spark debate in despite the Supreme Court decision allowing extraction of all fetuses not viable outside the womb. Therefore before viability, removing the fetus must be equivalent to removing any other harmful matter from the human body. When legality provides such moral certitude, then burning or recycling this material must be acceptable?
Scientific advances over the last forty years should not be a concern. Granted, in an office today one woman may excitedly present the framed ultrasound of the baby she and her husband have conceived and already named. Another woman looking on may have recently aborted a fetus more mature that the one depicted. However, doesnt the legal ruling provide the assurance needed to celebrate both events simultaneously?
I am sure some will raise the allusion to cremating millions of Jews during the Holocaust or the Japanese vivisection of prisoners. However, such misdirected passions should fall before the moral certainty provided to 300 million people by the deliberations of the Supreme Court. Surely our intellectual soundness has evolved sufficiently that ancient religions or philosophies should not intrude upon our society and its legal bulwarks?”
Company Stopped From Accepting Abortion Waste
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/fetal-tissue-power-oregon-homes-23449129?pt=tad2sct8p7?date20220628
Number of Abortions - Abortion Counters
http://www.numberofabortions.com/
Fetal Development (used to estimate abortion when average weight 1oz)
http://www.parents.com/pregnancy/stages/fetal-development/
Roe v. Wade
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade
Fetal viability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability
Planned Parenthood and the Statist Abyss
http://my.chicagotribune.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-84014437/
They discuss it? Dawg they have been doing it since Day 1, who do they think they are kidding?
At some point, I hope this makes anyone considering an abortion to pause for a moment. When they could just close their ears and not give much thought to what was being “ejected” from their body they were OK with it. But if they have to now consider that possibly the “being” in their womb is human enough to harvest its parts, just maybe this will make a difference. Question is how hardened are our hearts in the Western world.
Someone on the thread about the baby ISIS blew up countered with America’s obsession with abortion. At first I thought bringing that up was cold, but now I realize how true it is. We think it is disgusting and evil for ISIS to commit that atrocity, but how much better is the atrocity of harvesting unborn babies for parts? How can we even make any moral sense of what ISIS does if we are cold hearted enough to think what planned parenthood is doing, is OK.
I am afraid that the first thought of some who are considering an abortion will be, "How much do I get for the parts?"
Ugh. Possible.
Perhaps the ones that may be reachable will be the young girls who are desperate. Someone I know had an abortion half a lifetime ago, and she wishes someone would have lead her in another direction. Hopefully most won’t be that callous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.