That figure from the Gallup poll included all four groups - male homosexual ("gay"), female homosexual (lesbian), bisexual (which can be subdivided into female and male bisexuals), and transgender. Female bisexuals far outnumber true lesbians, as many so-called lesbians have had failed relationships with men. I would think that the inclusion of bisexuals in this mishmash greatly increases the reported percentage. The real percentage of true homosexuals in the general population is much lower than the 3.8% reported, and they are overwhelmingly males.
It's good to see some demonstrators out in front of the SCOTUS bullding to protest the decision.
All because the SCOTUS ruled doesn't mean that we can't change things around. As the Princeton professor quoted in the posted article said, the Dred Scott decision was abhorrent for American society as a whole, but it was completely turned on its head less than a decade later because enough decent people would not let it stand.
Exactly my point. Thank you for the post. People are wide awake and angry about this decision. This was necessary. Candidates have been forced to state an actual position and to think this won't be a major issue in the Presidential campaign is ridiculous.
The fight over homosexual "marriage" is not over. In point of fact, it's just beginning.
The Volestead act was overturned eventually too.
Let us hope Common Sense hasn’t been totally submerged by propaganda.
If they’re hawking that 3.8% figure, you know darn well it’s less. They’re not going to go with a number that is one person short of the absolute maximum they can claim.
To me this means they’ve padded the numbers to even get there.
Out of 100 people, I don’t think there are more than 2 that are homosexuals.
I don’t break down the different categories. To me these groups are all homosexuals if they’re into these types of activity.
I realize if they aren’t sexually attracted to people of the same sex, I’m technically wrong. My guiding point here is that I want none of these people around any kids I know.
They’re simply outside the scope of “normal people”. That’s good enough reason for me to categorize them in the same group. If they don’t like that, they can conform to normal lifestyles.
Thanks for the ping!
“As the Princeton professor quoted in the posted article said, the Dred Scott decision was abhorrent for American society as a whole, but it was completely turned on its head less than a decade later because enough decent people would not let it stand.”
The problem now is there’s less “Americans” and more “world citizens” who are here to suck off the whore host body this country’s been bastardized into, mostly by judicial activism and liberal social engineering.
As long as they get their checks, cell phones and cable TV, they won’t do anything to upset “their stuff”.