Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justiceseeker93

“As the Princeton professor quoted in the posted article said, the Dred Scott decision was abhorrent for American society as a whole, but it was completely turned on its head less than a decade later because enough decent people would not let it stand.”

The problem now is there’s less “Americans” and more “world citizens” who are here to suck off the whore host body this country’s been bastardized into, mostly by judicial activism and liberal social engineering.

As long as they get their checks, cell phones and cable TV, they won’t do anything to upset “their stuff”.


53 posted on 07/05/2015 4:59:36 AM PDT by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: GOPsterinMA

Bump.


54 posted on 07/05/2015 5:22:51 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: GOPsterinMA
The problem now is there’s less “Americans” and more “world citizens” who are here to suck off the whore host body this country’s been bastardized into, mostly by judicial activism and liberal social engineering.

I agree that the importation of "world citizens" to suck off the host body is a big problem, but I don't see these "world citizens" as necessarily an impediment to Americans fighting against "gay marriage." Why would a recently arrived immigrant be a defender of "gay marriage", unless perhaps he himself is a homosexual and wishes to take advantage of this newly found "right"? "Gay marriage" isn't a part of the experience of the vast majority recent immigrants or invaders.

56 posted on 07/05/2015 6:09:52 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson