Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
There is no possible good reason to deny polygamists the right to marry if the constitution requires that States recognize homosexuality as a protected right to the purpose of marriage.

Next in line after the polygamists are incest marriages.

Marriage is not about children any more. So why shouldn't a brother and sister or two brothers or two sisters get married?

The fact that some people find the idea disgusting is irrelevant. I find the idea of two men screwing each other in the butt equally disgusting.

52 posted on 07/01/2015 12:39:59 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba_Leroy

Well according to the activist judges, two of which should have recused themselves and one who lied and committed perjury to get the nomination under the 14th amendment and the equal protection clause they should be married.


55 posted on 07/01/2015 12:45:36 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: Bubba_Leroy

Don’t forget that wonderful activity, “fisting.” I wonder what age is typical for a homo to start wearing adult diapers....


62 posted on 07/01/2015 12:53:52 PM PDT by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson