Replies

I have been dealing with disinformation people on this and other forums for decades. Each of you think you’re just too smart for the rest of us. You each out yourselves through your arguments, and prove that you’re not smart enough to engage the rest of us.

I addressed a number of reasons why I think our elected leaders don’t care about our sovereignty or continuation of our nation down the road. You objected.

You selected a point to use as a wedge issue. It was one of multi-national organizations.

You decided that you could make points by stating you worked for a multi-national company.

That wasn’t the issue. Reasoned non-destructive commerce has never been the issue for any of us. So your mention of your employment fell under one or both of the following categories.

1. It didn’t belong in this conversation because it had no bearing on it
2. It was raised under a false flag to try to confuse people on the subject.

I already mentioned that if your company did not displace U. S. workers, it had no bearing on this issue. Mentioning it would only serve to attempt to influence folks to think I objected to all multi-national companies, thus making me look unreasoned.

FAIL!

Then you addressed the issue of displacement of your workers here in the U. S. That may or may not mean what you attempted to make it seem it did.

You stated that everyone has been at your company for over a decade, and that they have even added workers.

What you didn’t address is what type of a company it is.

Is it a company that off-shores work? You didn’t say did you.

Your parent organization here in the U. S. could easily have facilitated work off-shore since the late 1990s, and still be doing it.

What this would mean, is that your parent office here in the U. S. could actually have added employees, but at the same time could have facilitated the loss of tens of thousands of jobs outside your office to foreign nationals.

You didn’t bother to address the possibility of that did you.

So we’re left with three factors to contemplate.

One, you should not have mentioned your participation in a multi-national company in the first place if it didn’t off-shore work.

Two, you should have come clean about displacement of American jobs if it was taking place.

Three, you should have admitted that if two wasn’t a factor, that you were simply gaming the conversation by even mentioning your multi-national company in the first place for propaganda value.