Posted on 06/29/2015 4:12:30 PM PDT by Kid Shelleen
--SNIP-- Scalias point is central to understanding the backwardness of this ruling. Obamacare was written with the language Scalia described for a very specific reason. The goal was to coerce states into creating their own exchanges by tying access to federal subsidies to the creation of state-specific Obamacare marketplaces.
Recall Jonathan Gruber, the MIT economist and architect of Obamacare, who became a household name when it was revealed that he mocked the stupidity of the American voter for believing Obamacare wouldnt ban their insurance plans or increase costs. He also stated in January 2012: I think whats important to remember politically about this, is if youre a state and you dont set up an Exchange, that means your citizens dont get their tax credits.
(Excerpt) Read more at rare.us ...
Psychotic, treasonous "Judge" Roberts:
"Words are what I want them to be. Now bow before us."
didn’t forget and did know all about Gruber. The court willfully defied law and has decided to complete it’s journey to lawlessness.
Was the Gruber video part of the record before the court? And was there any other evidence presented to the court that this was intentionally put in the law to coerce the states? I think this is precisely what happened but I would expect that something like this would be corroborated by more than Gruber.
Not oversight. Roberts was obviously ordered to rule that way, likely by the GOPe. The cowards never wanted to kill it - they want to exploit it.
Way to go Corrie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.