If marriage isn’t between one man and one woman, it is
ANYTHING
and
NOTHING
Of course opens the door to legal polygamy.
We all saw that coming.
What a clever man he is. I wish I’d gone to Harvard, and then I’d be able to think up things like that in my very own head.
The floodgates are open.
I want to see someone push for polygamy. They need to push as hard as they can and start the backlash.
The flood gates are open now.
“John Roberts: I cant help but think this decision opens the door to legal polygamy”
YA THINK???
HomoNazis forcing themselves on America like it was a nine year old boy.
When words mean nothing...they just mean nothing. Please swear allegiance to our new rulers, 5 unelected lawyers.
I just don’t see how you can’t allow me to have four wives. To make me happy....it’s obvious that you just need to issue the other licenses and let me do something stupid.
I also don’t see how you can even allow a age limit. If I wanted to marry a 12-year gal from Waco....you’d have to allow that right.
I bring this up....there’s a French law dating back to the late 1700s that says if you were engaged to someone and they die before the marriage ceremony, then with the permission of parents and local judge....you will be married in proxy to the dead guy or gal. As of the 1980s...it’d only been used a couple of times and I think it’s been used once in the past five years. Marriage to a dead guy....but legal.
WONDERFUL!
I want to marry my recliner and refrigerator.
If you lived under rule of law it would, but in a non-constitutional oligarchy, socialists hate Mormons so no polygamy.
Unlike some forms of marital relationships, a marriage of two members of the same sex is a partnership of equals
SO.... Roberts is saying that a MAN and WOMAN are not EQUALS ?
Roberts is doing nothing but giving a hint of things to come, he already knows it or he is giving someone the idea. Also, as I said on another thread, can marrying children be far behind?
Well, DUH, John. And how about 3 men, 2 women and a dog?
I demand to marry a humu humu nuku nuku apua a, a barn owl and a cantaloupe.
That could be interpreted that ONLY two men are equal, but the Gaystopo was arguing that a man and a man were the EQUAL of a man and a woman. Thus, by their original logic (sic), every marriage is a marriage of EQUALS. It's not a leap to say a polygamous marriagae is a marriage of EQUALS.
Moreover, the Supremes decided in 1890 they could define marriage as between ONE man and ONE woman. Today's warped decision changed that definition. If a definition can be changed ONCE, it can be changed TWICE, or THREE times, etc...
Your property will become someone else's right. Your time on this planet is some one else's right.
If you oppose polygamy then you are Islamophobic and hate Muslims.
Can’t have that.
So to be tolerant of diverse cultures we MUST legalize polygamy as soon as possible.
I mean the SCOTUS should legalize it.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Roberts is into this kinky stuff himself. He probably gets down with the knights of Malta when he goes there on vacations.