Posted on 06/25/2015 5:00:07 AM PDT by Michael van der Galien
As our own Rick Moran reported yesterday, liberal media have used a new study by the New America Foundation to pretend that white Americans pose a bigger threat to national security than Muslim radicals. Rick explains that this conclusion can’t be drawn from the report at all: it’s only possible to say so when one ignores the failed terrorist attacks by Islamic extremists. If those are included, Islamists are far more dangerous than “white Americans.”
However, that didn’t stop Mediaite from publishing an article blasting white Americans (as I wrote two days ago, white self-hate is now officially politically correct). The same can be said for the New York Times with its recent headline: “Right-wing extremists more deadly than Muslim radicals in U.S.”
Like Rick, Islamic reformer M. Zuhdi Jasser — who has decided his life to fighting radical Islam — is having none of it. He writes on Facebook:
"When the New York Times becomes indistinguishable from Qatari government Islamist media at Al Jazeera:
“Right-wing extremists more deadly than Muslim radicals in U.S.”
"(All the Islamism that’s fit to print)
"The idiocy of this story and its data will be verified by its reproduction in every Islamist venue around the planet… all the while ISIS and the global jihad spread at home and abroad exponentially."
Of course it’s also rather ironic that the liberal media only started counting after 9/11. If those attacks are included, it isn’t even close. But hey, why would you include the single biggest terrorist attack in U.S. history when trying to determine what kind of extremists are more deadly than others?
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Not to mention that those lefties undercounted. Even if you leave 911 out, Muzzies win the body count. Also, let’s look at the murder rate: “Rightwingers” vs all Muslims. Muslims are only 1% of the population. While we’re at it, since we’re using skin color, let’s look at deaths by blacks and Hispanics.
The “M” in Zudhi Jasser’s name stands for “Mohammed”. He keeps it under wraps, sort of like Barack H. (Hussein) Obama.
He reads the same Koran as ISIS. Just sayin’.
Agreed. At the end of the day, he still worships an evil, murdering child-rapist...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.