Then I realized it was the NYT so they meant me.
LOL, no, they blame the evil gun.
“Whereas if it’s a Muslim, the assumption is that they must have done it because of their religion.”
Uh, yeah.....it is.
Another NYSlimes piece on:
Muslims----Good but misunderstood
Those critical of muslims----Bad and extremists, and much more dangerous.
The Storm Roofer was a TEA Party member?
Oh yea, homegrown radicals are more dangerous than those 19 Saudis.
The lengths to which the mainstream media will go to insulate and protect Muslims is unreal.
He actually means since Sept. 12, 2001.
If you include Sept 11th the number goes up by all of those killed on Sept. 11th.
This guys is also not considering all of those who have or will die of cancer as a result of 9/11. 911 death toll rises as cancer cases oar
This article is pure bovine excrement.
Here’s my takeaway, Muslims comprise less than 1% of the U.S. population yet have committed over 50% of the terrorist killings. Thanks for sharing NYT. As Johnny Carson used to say, “I did not know that”.
This article is a pebble in the pond intended to generate ripples to support this new meme of the threat of domestic terrorism. This dreck is issued by New America Foundation, a Washington, DC think tank whose board features no less a luminary than Jonathon Soros. Executing a core dump in 3...2...1.
Then I realized it was the NYT so they meant me.
Who's the most dangerous homegrown radical? The White House is FULL of them!
Did the New York Times leave out the three thousand Americans killed on 9/11?
So the 3,000 Americans killed by Muslims don't count because the New York Times STARTS counting AFTER 9/11... TOTALLY DISHONEST.
How many Americans were killed by black terrorists (black gang members)?
I'll bet that number is higher that 48... Higher than 48 in the last month.
By their criminal actions of allowing violent convicts to get out of prison, lax sentencing, and discouraging of defenseless people to acquire firearms, liberal policies have caused the deaths of thousands of innocent Americans since the sixties. They’ve got the blood of tens of thousands of innocent people on their hands.
Just about anything can be “proven” depending on what is trying to be proven. Does this include the various attacks like the white woman beheaded in Oklahoma by a black muslim convert?
There is no way this is true /preaching to the choir
Because the FBI is focused on Jihadists—a much greater threat than right-wing radicals—they have been able to stop potential attacks by Muslim radicals before they occur.
Here’s some of them:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsuccessful_terrorist_plots_in_the_United_States_post-9/11
so at least they are admitting that half of them were by 1% of the population.
| June to Date Shot & Killed: 36 Shot & Wounded: 199 Total Shot: 235 Total Homicides: 39 |
Week in Progress (6/21 – 6/27) Shot & Killed: 5 Shot & Wounded: 41 Total Shot: 46 Total Homicides: 5 |
Year To Date Shot & Killed: 182 Shot & Wounded: 1044 Total Shot: 1226 Total Homicides: 211 |
Even the liberals on Reddit have completely dismantled this article in their news subreddit.
This is complete bullcrap.
So what’s the RATE of murder and mayhem per sub-group?
I’ll stay away from young middle eastern males, thanks.