Posted on 06/18/2015 12:55:54 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that an Arizona town violated a local church's free speech rights by preventing it from posting signs notifying the public of its worship services.
The court decided 9-0 in favor of Good News Community Church....
....."Speech discrimination is wrong regardless of whether the government intended to violate the First Amendment or not, and it doesn't matter if the government thinks its discrimination was well-intended," said attorney David Cortman of the Christian legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, which represented the church.
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.reuters.com ...
Racists would deny Black people products or services and they would be boycotted out of business.
Gays would demand wedding cakes from Christian bakers and their cries would be drowned out by the crickets.
Only if you want to argue a Freedom of Speech First Amendment defense. You could also frame it as a Freedom of Religion case and leave the speech qualification out entirely. Or you could argue for Free Association, or Involuntary Servitude, all of which sidestep the Free Speech issue.
The federal Public Accommodations Act does not protect homosexuals, and only a minority of states have Public Accommodations Laws that protect homosexuals. That is why there have only been a handful of cases involving bakers or florists and gay weddings.
I have seen cakes that would and do fall under the idea of art. Some are just mind boggling. Its almost a shame to cut them up and consume them...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
9th circus reversed again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.