1 posted on
06/18/2015 5:24:10 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
The answer to all of those questions except the last (”What do we do about it?”) is “It would be treason.”
To: Kaslin; P-Marlowe
Good for Judge Napolitano.
All things that I’ve wondered, and some of them I’ve believed since early in the Benghazi event.
3 posted on
06/18/2015 5:30:15 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray for their victory or quit saying you support our troops)
To: Kaslin
One of the few willing to lay it all out. Judge Napolitano is putting himself out there if the grip of tyranny grows much tighter in the US.
4 posted on
06/18/2015 5:32:01 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: Kaslin
Maybe the good Judge could just blame Pam Gellar.
To: Kaslin
What if?
Nothing, that’s what if.
6 posted on
06/18/2015 5:43:10 AM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
To: Kaslin
What if it all happened before, but it was a Republican administration? What if a Democrat Congress prevented a Republican President from supplying arms to rebels in Nicaragua? What if the Republican administration attempted to bypass Congress by selling arms to rebels in Iran and used those proceeds to supply the rebels in Nicaragua?
What if the Democrats found out and held open hearings? What it the National Security Advisor, Deputy National Security Advisor, Assistant Secretary of State, and others were convicted because of this?
What if the Secretary of Defense was indicted on perjury and obstruction charges, timed to influence the upcoming Presidential election?
What if the wife of the Democrat President who won that election is behind the plot to arm the terrorists today?
-PJ
9 posted on
06/18/2015 5:54:48 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: Kaslin
Nice article Judge N. But I do have a problem with this near the end:
"... What if the stated purpose of the committee -- to seek the truth about Benghazi -- is not the true purpose? What if the real purpose of that committee is to suppress the truth so that the president and Clinton and the other conspirators do not get indicted? What if the truth is the last thing the conspirators want to see come out? ..."
If hiding the truth is the goal then the absolute worst choice for committee chairman would be Trey Gowdy. He is an ex-prosecutor and, IMHO, as straight arrow as they come.
There have been previous Benghazi committees where the Judge is correct but not the current one. Gowdy is slow and methodical but he is turning over rocks and we are finding things out. Give him some time.
To: Kaslin
You ask so many questions,
what answers should I choose?
Is this plain old heebie-jeebies
or just
Existential Blues?
14 posted on
06/18/2015 6:40:48 AM PDT by
null and void
(I wish we lived in less interesting times, but at least we have front-row seats.)
To: Kaslin
God bless you, judge.
Watch your six.
15 posted on
06/18/2015 6:45:20 AM PDT by
OKSooner
(Chamberlain at least loved his country, please don't insult his memory by comparing him to 0.)
To: Kaslin; COUNTrecount; Nowhere Man; FightThePower!; C. Edmund Wright; jacob allen; Travis McGee; ...
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son
The biggest killer of mankind
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...
17 posted on
06/18/2015 6:50:11 AM PDT by
null and void
(I wish we lived in less interesting times, but at least we have front-row seats.)
To: Kaslin
Kinda puts HPSCI Chairman Mike Rodger’s (R-MI) “abrupt” retirement in perspective....
18 posted on
06/18/2015 6:54:10 AM PDT by
paddles
("The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." Tacitus)
To: Kaslin
19 posted on
06/18/2015 6:57:48 AM PDT by
Bloody Sam Roberts
("It is never untimely to yank the rope of freedom's bell." - - Frank Capra)
To: Kaslin; Liz; null and void; Old Sarge; EnigmaticAnomaly; Califreak; kalee; TWhiteBear; freeangel; ..
What If They Are Hiding the Truth?
Townhall.com ^ | June 18, 2015 | Judge Andrew Napolitano
Check out article and comments, esp # 11 by Liz.
Thanks, Nully.
20 posted on
06/18/2015 7:00:38 AM PDT by
LucyT
To: Kaslin
To: Kaslin
So who will do anything about this situation/ Clearly the Clinton Foundation is a SlushFund. Why is no one investigating. Why have the Clinton’s not been charged. A nation of cowards.
26 posted on
06/18/2015 7:19:14 AM PDT by
DrDude
(Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
To: Kaslin
What if Hillary’s server and emails were recovered?
33 posted on
06/18/2015 9:44:26 AM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(War IS the answer! Peace activists never liberated anything or anyone....)
To: Kaslin
What if we have a usurper at the helm?
36 posted on
06/18/2015 11:34:36 AM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: Kaslin
38 posted on
06/18/2015 4:39:49 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
To: Kaslin
41 posted on
06/19/2015 10:50:53 PM PDT by
Tunehead54
(Nothing funny here ;-)
To: Kaslin
Just strike every “what if” and change the question marks to periods.
45 posted on
06/21/2015 7:04:03 PM PDT by
Ray76
(Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson