Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graffiti artists suing 5Pointz owner for whitewashing their work from building
NY Daily News ^ | June 12, 2015 | Ginger Adams Otis

Posted on 06/17/2015 9:50:15 AM PDT by Zakeet

Nine graffiti artists who spray painted creations across the world-renowned 5Pointz building filed a lawsuit Friday in Brooklyn federal court, seeking unspecified damages from the owner who whitewashed away their artwork.

[Snip]

The aerosol artists say they are owed substantial cash damages because Wolkoff painted over their al fresco works.

[Snip]

The iconic buildings had more than 350 works of visual art on the walls — inside and out — when Wolkoff destroyed them, the lawsuit said.

The colorful, eye-catching creations were torn down for good last summer.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 5pointz; akadeblasio; bronx; brooklyn; donaldchump; donaldhump; donaldtrump; election2016; georgepataki; graffiti; lawsuits; manhattan; mikebloomberg; newyork; newyorkcity; nypd; peterking; propertyrights; queens; richmond
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last
To: IYAS9YAS

“(2) With respect to works of visual art created before the effective date set forth in section 610(a) of the Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990, but title to which has not, as of such effective date, been transferred from the author, the rights conferred by subsection (a) shall be coextensive with, and shall expire at the same time as, the rights conferred by section 106. “

Dig deeper ...


101 posted on 06/17/2015 12:06:14 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Vandalism is a crime. Unless the owner asked them to paint it and even then it is his property and he can do as he sees fit. If I owned a Picasso and decide to paint over it that is my business not your nor the world’s.

Yup. And for most of Picasso's works, that would be no great loss for the world IMO.

102 posted on 06/17/2015 12:16:31 PM PDT by zeugma (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3294350/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Dig deeper ...

Don't need to, unless they can prove that no artist ever covered up another artist's work, they lose.

103 posted on 06/17/2015 12:21:11 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson