Posted on 06/16/2015 1:06:54 PM PDT by LibWhacker
By June 16, 2014 (NASA) (Source: NASA)
In the remote and forested terrain of Juina in western Brazil, an ugly rock with an uglier name surfaced months ago inside a diamond mine. It was a tiny green crystal, all scars and bumps. It literally look[ed] like [it had] been to hell and back, one scientist said in March. But despite the provenance, the ringwoodite stone wasnt scorched it was, in fact, sopping wet.
Providing an unparalleled glimpse into the our planets innards, the stone rode a violent volcanic eruption to the surface from 325 miles inside the Earths mantle. The eruption is analogous to dropping a Mentos mint into a bottle of soda, Graham Pearson, a geochemist at the University of Alberta, told LiveScience. Its a very energetic, gas-charged reaction that blasts its way to the Earths surface.
It was one of the first times anyone had seen the sponge-like ringwoodite in anything but a meteorite or a laboratory. Formed only in conditions of extreme pressure, it is composed of 1.5 percent water and appeared to confirm that the Earths insides are very, very wet. It translates into a very, very large mass of water, approaching the sort of mass of water thats present in all the worlds ocean, Pearson said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Wow, thanks Theoria.
Anyway, this tired old BS crops up once in a while, so much so it has its own keyword.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/ringwoodite/index
Nobody could speak as well as James Mason. Murdock on the "A-Team" did a good impersonation though.
No problem. I just hate the “no rain before the flood” argument because people cite to it with absolute moral certainty despite that there is no conclusive support one way or the other from the text. I agree with you that I actually don’t care theologically whether there was or was not, but I do care about being faithful to the text.
Rainbows post flood versus pre flood? Again, I think either reading can be justified from the text.
I hate that I can’t trust rainbows anymore.
Well, the Bible says in (NIV)Genesis 1, 6-8:
And God said, Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water. 7 So God made the vault and separated the water under the vault from the water above it. And it was so. 8 God called the vault sky. And there was evening, and there was morningthe second day.
“I hate that I cant trust rainbows anymore.”
LOL!
Nothing like walking down a city street and your toddler sees all the rainbows in the window and says “Daddy - can we go in there!?” only to find out its a gay bar.
How it would look if you combined all the oceans into one 860-mile-wide drop (with a volume of about 333m cubic miles) and were able to suspend it weightless over Kansas:
“To me, this is a confirmation of the Biblical flood.”
In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. (Gen 7:11)
...the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up...
And earlier in Genesis, we read,
But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground. (Gen 2:6)
Science is at last confirming what we already knew if we were to believe what is written in God’s Word...
Thanks, I’m going to take a look at some of those this weekend when I have a little more time.
LOL
California Water Cuts Leave City Days Away From Running Out Of Water
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3300919/posts
They will just need to dig a well a bit deeper then planned.....
” The oceans werent perhaps the product of icy comets as earlier research theorized, but were the result of geological and tectonic activity that drove water to the surface.”
More settled science out the window.
LOL, hillarious. I’m snaggin’ it.
It explains both where the water came from and where it went. It came from "the fountains of the great deep" AND from "the floodgates (networks) of the heavens."
Give every Californian a spoon and tell them to start digging.....................
Jacobsen is so full of guano! He is no scientist, he is an alarmist. I don’t believe Science today, it is agenda and money driven.
Scientists don’t use logical fallacies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.